💤 Inactive SecureServer.TV / Killstream.TV - ALL PAYPIGS DOXED BY RALPH on October 15th, 2021.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Why is watch.x22report.tv still up with all this shit going on? Does he just not care? It really does look like they just shit canned ralph.
View attachment 2664568
I was just going to post this.

Both these work:
https://www.secureserver.tv/x22-report/
https://x22report.tv/
1.PNG
And other SS customers work too:
https://coneofarc.tv/
https://jordansather.tv/
https://turleytalks.tv
https://www.themelkshow.tv/

The gunt is punted.
 
Last edited:
I very much enjoy the parallel between sstv's message to ralph and ralph's messages to Faith. Hey Ralph, remember how bad you wanted Faith to abort Xander when you sent her "I understand if you want to get an abortion," and how disappointed you felt when she said no. Well, that's how SS is feeling with their "We understand if you want to break your contract."
 
Ralph, may suspect this but him leaving means that when he starts asking paypigs to subscribe again, all those 1-year subs will start asking about refunds because why the fuck should the pay again? Which would obviously be very bad for the morbidly obese faggot.
I suppose Ralph is reading this. If he is worried about refunds, all he has to do is tell those who made 1 year subscriptions that they will enjoy exclusive access free of charge on his new platform (assuming he sees sense and finally ditches secureserver for something else) for the remainder of their subscription to Killstream.tv.

He has their names and emails. That shouldn't be too difficult to carry out.
 
I very much enjoy the parallel between sstv's message to ralph and ralph's messages to Faith. Hey Ralph, remember how bad you wanted Faith to abort Xander when you sent her "I understand if you want to get an abortion," and how disappointed you felt when she said no. Well, that's how SS is feeling with their "We understand if you want to break your contract."
I think he's flat out lying about that. I think they told him to find somewhere else to go in x days because their server guy has an itchy delete finger, also feel free to keep the domain because you've already paid for the year, and x days have passed. I know the popular view is that securepajeettv doesn't want public trouble from Ralph, but it's equally likely that they want him to tell everyone who will listen that he got kicked off so the hackers follow him to wherever he goes next and quit fucking with their network (and I hope the next stop is compound media, their paywall is notoriously porous and their loudmouth owner is notoriously thin skinned about trolls)

The closest that I can see Ralph's statement getting to reality is sstv telling him "we pulled it down. It's fucking up everyone else, and we don't know when or if it's going back up. If you need this service right now, you should look elsewhere. Here is our billing person's contact information to work that situation out"
 
I think he's flat out lying about that. I think they told him to find somewhere else to go in x days because their server guy has an itchy delete finger, also feel free to keep the domain because you've already paid for the year, and x days have passed. I know the popular view is that securepajeettv doesn't want public trouble from Ralph, but it's equally likely that they want him to tell everyone who will listen that he got kicked off so the hackers follow him to wherever he goes next and quit fucking with their network (and I hope the next stop is compound media, their paywall is notoriously porous and their loudmouth owner is notoriously thin skinned about trolls)

The closest that I can see Ralph's statement getting to reality is sstv telling him "we pulled it down. It's fucking up everyone else, and we don't know when or if it's going back up. If you need this service right now, you should look elsewhere. Here is our billing person's contact information to work that situation out"
Very compelling, but it makes this claim about 'offering him 1 month free' etc into a super weird lie, doesn't it? I guess it would be one way to say he's giving his paypigs the month free and spin it as a win? That would be ridiculous, though.


I dunno.... I think I'm presently convinced that if they're done with him, he doesn't know it yet.
 
Very compelling, but it makes this claim about 'offering him 1 month free' etc into a super weird lie, doesn't it? I guess it would be one way to say he's giving his paypigs the month free and spin it as a win? That would be ridiculous, though.


I dunno.... I think I'm presently convinced that if they're done with him, he doesn't know it yet.
It's already weird, because what do you do about the people who paid for a year up front when you apply "do not bill current month" across all accounts?
 
I suppose Ralph is reading this. If he is worried about refunds, all he has to do is tell those who made 1 year subscriptions that they will enjoy exclusive access free of charge on his new platform (assuming he sees sense and finally ditches secureserver for something else) for the remainder of their subscription to Killstream.tv.

He has their names and emails. That shouldn't be too difficult to carry out.
It shouldn't be difficult to carry out, but neither should using BCC on emails to subscribers.
 
As for the Delaware thing, I've just listened to an old MATI and Josh said Stripe is SServer's payment processor. Well looky looky who has a special program that helps people, even non US citizens, build a company in DE? Stripe

Also, if that's the case, then the Gunt might actually get SS banned from Stripe, look at their ToS: (Stripe might terminate the contract) if your participation in Stripe Atlas or use of the Stripe Atlas Service presents, in our sole discretion, a heightened risk of legal or regulatory non-compliance or an unacceptable risk of harm to Stripe or a Service Provider.
 
The fact secureserver.tv has no social media presence, basically non-existent on LinkedIn, and never promote themselves anywhere should be extremely telling. This service is a front to something very shady. Even the lowest of the low form of rubbish pay to win games and clickbait social media websites involve themselves in advertising.

It also appears that this very thread has been completely delisted from search results. I've tried many search engines. Ones that don't care about political correctness gives poor results. Ones that do gives nothing, this thread is no where to be found.

Searching for various cows would at least yield the .ru site on page one near the end.
 

the other web sites being running is what is to be expected. he said his one is being made in a new system, the ones that are not his being up is consistent with that. any 404 or 500 error on his SS does not mean a thing because a new system that he said was being made should be not seen before he is told to by SS to make changes to the dns or until SS change it to be redirected to new system. explaining this is if you make a server and set up and configured the server and moved the video play back files to new server. and before that is set up it can be not public because website is not a redirect to new server.

a thought im having is the time is extended and delayed because the time to send the videos to new server from old server. it will not be just uploading file it can be titling aswell. and it is a by hand process not just copy of folder.

the developer on ss may have made it and given tasks to service staff to upload files when could be sending videos to new server. take sqlite table on videos and edit to find with replacing to new internal video location on new server. and import new sqlite table into new server
but i am thinking it is not done in that method. and is done with slow manual method(same method ralph would use to make a new post to the website).

ralph should find the reason why it is taking up a long time to make the new site if already has been made and is needing video files uploaded. he could have that site up with new videos from now and have older videos added after

it might have to still be developed and that is a reason why it is longer than one week.

@glownig can you find the server ? can you see any new code on new server? that last hack. was it with a new way you found to get in to the server or same way you got in to it first and the second?
 
the other web sites being running is what is to be expected. he said his one is being made in a new system, the ones that are not his being up is consistent with that. any 404 or 500 error on his SS does not mean a thing because a new system that he said was being made should be not seen before he is told to by SS to make changes to the dns or until SS change it to be redirected to new system. explaining this is if you make a server and set up and configured the server and moved the video play back files to new server. and before that is set up it can be not public because website is not a redirect to new server.

a thought im having is the time is extended and delayed because the time to send the videos to new server from old server. it will not be just uploading file it can be titling aswell. and it is a by hand process not just copy of folder.

the developer on ss may have made it and given tasks to service staff to upload files when could be sending videos to new server. take sqlite table on videos and edit to find with replacing to new internal video location on new server. and import new sqlite table into new server
but i am thinking it is not done in that method. and is done with slow manual method(same method ralph would use to make a new post to the website).

ralph should find the reason why it is taking up a long time to make the new site if already has been made and is needing video files uploaded. he could have that site up with new videos from now and have older videos added after

it might have to still be developed and that is a reason why it is longer than one week.

@glownig can you find the server ? can you see any new code on new server? that last hack. was it with a new way you found to get in to the server or same way you got in to it first and the second?
Interesting points, personally I think they're considering 2 options:

1) Getting rid of Ralph because he's a risk to their users'security, so they won't get banned by Stripe
2) Setting up a new company, unrelated to Secure Server, for lunatics like Ralph so their main platform doesn't get jannied
 
a thought im having is the time is extended and delayed because the time to send the videos to new server from old server. it will not be just uploading file it can be titling aswell. and it is a by hand process not just copy of folder.

@glownig can you find the server ? can you see any new code on new server? that last hack. was it with a new way you found to get in to the server or same way you got in to it first and the second?
Part of the time delay is probably trying to get the subscriptions sorted out. Around 2/3 were cancelled when the passwords were leaked and the rest were deleted and unsubscribed last hack. If they have the ability to "resubscribe" people from a backup then they need to figure out who actually wanted to unsubscribe or face legal issues.
If not they'll use the free month and hope enough people resubscribe manually.
 
Paper aborted, site aborted, Steak sides aborted, soon freedom aborted again.
Lmfao how many Ls can you possibly take Ralph. If you truly are a "A FUCKING KING" then your shit's the constitutional monarchy of Internet kingdoms. No political power, and you just wither away and watch people better than you slowly move you to the side. Dick's not gonna weep a single tear once you're gone and done with. He'll just say "Thank God he's not my problem anymore. This fat retard was poisoning my brand and image."
 
Last edited:
the other web sites being running is what is to be expected. he said his one is being made in a new system, the ones that are not his being up is consistent with that. any 404 or 500 error on his SS does not mean a thing because a new system that he said was being made should be not seen before he is told to by SS to make changes to the dns or until SS change it to be redirected to new system. explaining this is if you make a server and set up and configured the server and moved the video play back files to new server. and before that is set up it can be not public because website is not a redirect to new server.

a thought im having is the time is extended and delayed because the time to send the videos to new server from old server. it will not be just uploading file it can be titling aswell. and it is a by hand process not just copy of folder.

the developer on ss may have made it and given tasks to service staff to upload files when could be sending videos to new server. take sqlite table on videos and edit to find with replacing to new internal video location on new server. and import new sqlite table into new server
but i am thinking it is not done in that method. and is done with slow manual method(same method ralph would use to make a new post to the website).

ralph should find the reason why it is taking up a long time to make the new site if already has been made and is needing video files uploaded. he could have that site up with new videos from now and have older videos added after

it might have to still be developed and that is a reason why it is longer than one week.

@glownig can you find the server ? can you see any new code on new server? that last hack. was it with a new way you found to get in to the server or same way you got in to it first and the second?
Sure, that's all possible, but:

Why would sstv hand develop a unique new server for a small, troublesome client paying the bare minimum and leave everyone else up if the leaks affected all of their clients?
 
Sure, that's all possible, but:

Why would sstv hand develop a unique new server for a small, troublesome client paying the bare minimum and leave everyone else up if the leaks affected all of their clients?
Spinning up a new VM with a fresh sanitized database solely for ralph would take them a day or two, with time to spare. Frankly, I'm surprised they used a central DB for all their clients rather than distributing that data.
 
Spinning up a new VM with a fresh sanitized database solely for ralph would take them a day or two, with time to spare. Frankly, I'm surprised they used a central DB for all their clients rather than distributing that data.
That's exactly it. In my experience, a website that's down this long simply doesn't come back up
 
Back
Top Bottom