- Joined
- Aug 25, 2017
These pajeets were smart enough to hire a native English speaker so the marks wouldn't run off the instant they had to talk to some poo in the loo when something went wrong.
💤 Inactive SecureServer.TV / Killstream.TV - ALL PAYPIGS DOXED BY RALPH on October 15th, 2021.
- Thread starter AltisticRight
- Start date
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2020
I wish I could rate a post both informative and horrifying.
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2018
It's not dead. Customer sites (excluding Killstream) are still up: https://watch.x22report.tv/webtv-v3/
They just fucked up their main site or some hacker took it down.
CECA Loather
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2021
It makes me wonder who is legally liable in this instance for the breach.
Is it the Pajeets running the site?
Or is it anyone with a little bit of tech knowhow entering the server with ease because of how lousy the whole thing is set up?
The way you put it, I think secureserver should be held liable. I am just a layman but the way you are putting it, it seems that metaphorically speaking, secureserver is holding the doors of his house wide open with flashing lights asking everyone to enter and loot the place.
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2018
Killstream.tv is still up too, it's a separate domain/server that points at the sstv back end. Can we play video from the x22report domain or invoke the login page that would hit the sstv servers?
You still have to access the directory to do anything, the explanation was regarding the "why is a sign of horrible incompetence that the folder is exposed" question. The answer being that it's got a lot of important stuff in it, and leaving it exposed/visible is leaving a potentially very damaging vector of attack open. Whether the attack succeeds or not is another question, but step 1 at a service with "secure" in the name would to be to not leave those avenues of potential intrusion available in the first place
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
First "Camden County High School."
Then "Camen County High school." Wut?
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2018
Yeah, X22 videos are still there so should play for anyone logged in.
Killstream.tv videos are now gone from the CDN so if it comes back, all his videos will likely need to be re-uploaded unless they moved them to whatever new CDN he is setting up. But it's far more likely shit ain't coming back.
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2018
The more basic template that is coneofarc.tv returns "fatal error: unknown domain" when it tries to directly hit the sstv servers after using the signup link.
X22 appears to have all of its assets residing entirely under its own domain
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2016
I cannot help myself from adding this to the OP. Well done!
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2018
This guy works for Secure Server dot Net and is infinitely more qualified than the people we've found that work for Secure Server dot TV. nmap scan below also shows only 80/443 open which is what you should see when scanning a web host. These retards are getting absolutely techmogged by a pack of Bengali curryniggers. This level of professional embarrassment shouldn't even be possible.
Code:
$ nmap --open secureserver.net
Starting Nmap 7.80 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2021-11-03 06:40 MDT
Nmap scan report for secureserver.net (208.109.192.71)
Host is up (0.074s latency).
rDNS record for 208.109.192.71: ip-208-109-192-71.ip.secureserver.net
Not shown: 998 filtered ports
Some closed ports may be reported as filtered due to --defeat-rst-ratelimit
PORT STATE SERVICE
80/tcp open http
443/tcp open https
Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 6.61 seconds(Post edited for clarity as original post caused some confusion)
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2021
What the fuck are they doing?
...and the tech support is a fucking truck driver from Walmart. That drives Uber in his spare time.
Military Grade Encryption Ladies and Guntlemen.
Oh I can see this is going to be another "win" for the Ralphamale.
I just have that feeling...
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2018
So their "project manager" who "re-engineer test deploy end-user support" (what the fuck does that mean, does this person not know how to use commas or is that supposed to be a single sentence?) has only experience doing end-user support?
Wait, no sorry he was an "end-user support mentor", amazing.
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2016
Holy shit
I swear this was just one of the four Indian cities I know of and I pretty much randomly picked it.Having COOMER as your surname, Silicon Valley isn't sending their best.
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2020
I think this is the centre of India Tech scams, I remember the name and I think it's because of my binge watching of Jim Browning.View attachment 2684034
Holy shit
Edit: Holy Fuck it is.
It's bad enough their security is so bad it got breached three times - that we are aware of, which isn't surprising based on what I've seen of Tech Scammers network security - but to give your financial supporters details to some Kalkata based Indian Tech scammer is just awful, so irresponsible on every level. There's nothing to prevent these guys selling these details on to scammers who will phone them up aiming to rip them off.
Further Edit:
SecureServer.TV lack the IT skills of Indian Tech Scammers
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Imagine paypigging for some repulsive gunt that does this to you, then continuing to paypig as if he didn't just fuck you in the ass repeatedly. Looks like it isn't just Faith and May who got gunted. I wonder if the pajeets will outright scam their credit cards, or just put them on a sucker list for future scams.
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2020
My guess is the latter, that said idk much about how CCNs are kept secure from companies.
It does make some sense actually, although whether it is intentional is questionable, the demographics of those who used SecureServer are Qoomers and the like. People who are gullible, lack understanding of technology and are generally vulnerable rubes.
This could be a honeypot for identifying people who are marks, and charging then for the pleasure. Whoever said Pajeets were incompetent?
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
In this case, apparently not at all, because there was CC info in the original leak by @Mundane Ralph
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2020
Was it not just the last 3 of the CCN though, I know that is often accessible but it's not necessarily an issue.
Don't vendors/companies use a 3rd party to process the actual info so their hands are completely off it?
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Legitimate ones? Yes. Scamming pajeets in Calcutta? I think they do whatever they can get away with, although I'm not sure what that is. SA used to have actual CCNs that they kept in the clear, according to former goons.