Selecting a Despot for the Autism Thunderdome

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Null

Ooperator
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Nov 14, 2012
I want to onboard up to 5 additional staff members for the Autism Thunderdome category, including a head moderator who will direct it. The following is an explanation of what I hope to accomplish.


My long-standing issue with the politics area of the site started in 2016 when the Trump election happened. The partisanism which started at that time affected every community online. The forum has endured it better than most, but we were not unaffected.

Areas of the main forum may be divided into three categories:
1. The on-topic boards, which are all for entertainment through derision and uphold a standard of archiving so that they remain entertaining forever.
2. The off-topic boards, which are for casual discussion.
3. Autism Thunderdome, which may be distinguished from off-topic because its discussions are combative.

I use the term 'combative' to distinguish off-topic from A&H. This is why people hate that board and its users. Everywhere else on the site, there is a team. People generally understand and appreciate that this site and our community is balanced on a fucking thread. A&H does not get that. They are mostly users who joined after all of our largest problems were taken care of and don't care about the rest of the site. I feel these users are exploitative and see the forum as a means to an end rather than something to contribute to.

Many of these people participated in places like 4chan's /pol/, reddit's r/The_Donald, Gab, 8chan, and other areas which are now either total cesspits completely useless to an ordinary person - or just gone. These users, either knowingly or unwittingly, intend to use the forum until it's similarly destroyed before moving on to the next host organism.

My last attempt to hire mods resulted in L50s essentially issuing an ultimatum that I let him site-ban a bunch of people or he "can't fix it". The nuclear option of just declaring the site partisan-free, disabling registrations, and banning partisans protesting the decision by shitting up the site is always on the table ... but I'd rather people be able to talk about news and events without shitting their pants.

In short, the users that only post in that category will need to join or die.

1654353523318.png

On-boarding staff, as I've learned, is pointless if they don't have something to do. Off-topic has obvious standards, but on-topic boards follow my design. There is an 'ideal' on-topic thread in my head and my rules for the boards try to guide both users and mods into shaping threads to this standard.

Autism Thunderdome has no standard. There is no way for a person to help me moderate it because there are, effectively, no rules. I can't help set up these guidelines because I don't like talking about politics. I don't want to moderate political discussion. I don't want to deal with people sperging out about abortion and circumcision. I don't care, because I believe I am completely powerless to effectuate political change, so there is no reason to waste breath on it. Therefore, I cannot run a board about politics.

What I need is someone who has an idea of how to run the entire category of Autism Thunderdome, with an emphasis on maintaining unity within the community. It can't just be a dumping ground of political extremism with continuous slapfights. People should no longer expect to be allowed to treat the forum with reckless disregard on the assumption that I can deal with the consequences of what they say and do.

I don't know how to accomplish that, so a prospective despot is going to have to pitch it to me. If someone has a real plan, we can talk about making a bunch of moderators to help out with this plan.

It also does not help I don't know any of you fucking people. I barely recognize anyone anymore. I'm so happy when I see a name from 2013 that I actually recognize. How am I supposed to pick moderators and put people in charge when I don't know them? I see some people who have over a thousand posts and have been around a year and it's like -- who the hell are you? How do you post that much and where at to avoid me for an entire calendar year?

So, I think that's what we need.
 
Why not only allow florida man stories? Everyone loves florida man!

In seriousness, it sounds more like you're stuck in a rock and a hard place. You want someone to have leeway to set up a standard for the unmoderatable since you understandably don't want to touch the board with a 20 foot pole, but at the same time, giving them that much power is a risk, especially if they straight up ask to be part of it since that usually implies there's something they want to enforce in their own eyes.
Perhaps Athenian style lottery selection, make a pool of people you deem eligible and just....throw darts to pick.
 
I have no idea how your moderation teams work most of the time but I would say give the AT guys, whoever they are, more autonomy to clean the place up. I'm guessing most people don't want to be banned, even guys that have been here for just a year. Especially since getting back in currently is difficult to do. If they find out that they have a very good chance of getting axed for political sperging I think most will chill out. They've built up their identities, they have their precious user scores, I think only a few would push the issue further once they see a KF Kristallnacht going on.
 
Policing political discussion isn't easy. Just to have some kind of set standards maybe a mod or despot could intervene in A&H forum activities in the following situations:
1. When someone makes any threats regarding acts of violence that would take place in real life
2. When there is some pedantic mud flinging contest tell people to chill out otherwise the thread will be locked for too much sperging

Also I nominate myself as Despot with the promise I shall uphold the free speech standards of KiwiFarms while also making sure the political part of the site doesn't become a big circlejerk for any side of the political aisle.
 
Last edited:
The only way you're going to have it the way you want it is banning people whose posts you don't like. You haven't been able to come up with an idea and are asking for a pitch for this reason.

Personally, I'd just leave them to it (edit: apart from violent threats/illegal posts etc). Then again, I have very little idea of what stress you get from there so my opinion is definitely uninformed.
 
Last edited:
Ok so just stop overthinking this and delete the useless subforums that are full of people you hate and that you can't moderate, and ban anyone who migrates to the non-diseased parts of the site. The world doesn't *really* need another place where a bunch of retards can post memes about the day of the rope and 14/88. Or spin it off into a completely different site with independent management, and then fill said URL with the sleaziest porn and crypto ads you can find.
 
Ok so just stop overthinking this and delete the useless subforums that are full of people you hate and that you can't moderate, and ban anyone who migrates to the non-diseased parts of the site. The world doesn't *really* need another place where a bunch of retards can post memes about the day of the rope and 14/88. Or spin it off into a completely different site with independent management, and then fill said URL with the sleaziest porn and crypto ads you can find.
I disagree that I shouldn't be able to discuss something newsworthy on my own site though. Where else am I going to post about shit? I go to /pol/ after the TX shooting and the threads are mostly just discussions about which of the dead children are the sexiest. I can't fucking stand 4chan anymore, it's ruined.
 
I deliberately quit before I got to the point where I issued an ultimatum. I understand why it looks like I did issue one though, and my sudden and immediate resignation was partially an attempt to mitigate that. Even I'm not quite stupid enough to think I can boss around the person in charge of this site.

Good luck to whoever signs up next. I don't believe there is an A&H curse.
 
It doesn't help that many articles and topics are heated from the get go.

Compare an on-topic thread, whose purpose is gossiping about individuals or groups, a.k.a the purpose is having fun
vs
Articles about how group A or person B wants us to be injected with stuff, our kids indoctrinated and us living in pods

Those very threads don't spark happiness or genuine discussion, the topics themself are taken out of context rage-bait

I've stopped going to A&H because of how half of the threads are depressive, and the other half are bullshit to make you angry. I'd love to rage and sperg about politics, but the on-topic boards are just more fun and make you want to contribute.
 
Just ban anyone and everyone who complains about someone else's politisperging and trolling and baiting

People will stop complaining or everyone who complains will get bantz, soon enough no more embarrassing complaining that wastes staff time and raises blood pressure
 
Back