- Joined
- May 11, 2017
look you need a moderator willing to treat the combatants in the thunderdome with the same level of aggression that they're treating each other without having them be a power hungry dickhead or someone with a moral code incompatible with the job and you need to tell people exactly what they're doing wrong with clearly defined, if subjective, rules, so that they can't play some stupid semantic game with your own words against you. if you tell them straight up that you can't hide behind the pretenses of politeness in DA THUNDERDOME and then ban them if they try and waste the moderator's time then you really won't have any problems
you only need two rules:
1) No discussions in bad faith (everything from flaming to critical theory)
2) You get banned for trying to waste people's time (this includes the moderators)
A power hungry dickhead might actually be what is needed, effective moderators for such a volatile place need some degree of sociopath tendencies to deal wit the abuse.
As for moral codes, if someone has been here for a while I don't believe their moral code will be a problem.
As for rules and people arguing semantics, I've always subscribed to "Follow the spirit of the law, not the letter of the law, but if you annoy me I WILL use the letter of the law to fuck you up" but I do agree in making clear what is not allowed, but I wouldn't even bother with arguing, they know what they did and engaging with them would be a waste of time and energy while they get to soothe their bruised egos.