- Joined
- Oct 19, 2019
While this thread is technically a success due to roping in a couple of our maddest and dumbest Americans into replying seriously, your bait was still cast so poorly that the sheer amount of people rushing for their reaction image folder has likely saved a good half-dozen idiots from embarrassing themselves here.
The major problem here is that it's blindingly obvious that you're an autistic 2a fag playing the role of a soycuck gun-grabber, and that's largely because you're displaying a complete failure to empathise with viewpoints you're opposed to. While there's a significant gulf between America and Europe in the legality of weapons, duty to retreat and the interpretations of proportionality, the actual outlawing of violence committed in self-defence is a pretty unthinkable position that no country has ever or will ever adopt, and nobody supports outside of the boogymen inhabiting fever dreams of Texan doomers. The absurdity of your initial premise could be promising on it's own, if still clumsy, but immediately following up by bringing up and dismissing 2a arguments like daughters being raped and murdered shatters any reasonable suspension of disbelief people might be able to maintain. It's about as subtle and believeable as somebody pretending to be a pro-choice advocate by breaking into a maternity ward and stomping newborn babies.
Please work on better understanding the viewpoints and arguments of those opposed to your politics, and trying to scale back your political baits to staying within the realms of reasonable and believable, which can still provide pretty good results around here. If necessary, pick a topic that isn't as close to your heart, because as it stands you're coming across as much more invested and triggered over this issue than our most autistic pol transplants.
I hope this helps.
The major problem here is that it's blindingly obvious that you're an autistic 2a fag playing the role of a soycuck gun-grabber, and that's largely because you're displaying a complete failure to empathise with viewpoints you're opposed to. While there's a significant gulf between America and Europe in the legality of weapons, duty to retreat and the interpretations of proportionality, the actual outlawing of violence committed in self-defence is a pretty unthinkable position that no country has ever or will ever adopt, and nobody supports outside of the boogymen inhabiting fever dreams of Texan doomers. The absurdity of your initial premise could be promising on it's own, if still clumsy, but immediately following up by bringing up and dismissing 2a arguments like daughters being raped and murdered shatters any reasonable suspension of disbelief people might be able to maintain. It's about as subtle and believeable as somebody pretending to be a pro-choice advocate by breaking into a maternity ward and stomping newborn babies.
Please work on better understanding the viewpoints and arguments of those opposed to your politics, and trying to scale back your political baits to staying within the realms of reasonable and believable, which can still provide pretty good results around here. If necessary, pick a topic that isn't as close to your heart, because as it stands you're coming across as much more invested and triggered over this issue than our most autistic pol transplants.
I hope this helps.
