Senator Wiener Fires Back at Far-Right Attacks After Death Threat - (((Scott Weiner)))

(Article, archive)
image-6-1.png
State Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, has fired back against conservative pundit Charlie Kirk and a congresswoman from Georgia for comments they have recently made about him that he has described as homophobic and a "stain on our country" and have resulted in a death threat against him.

"If elected Republicans cared as much about their voters' concerns as Scott Wiener cares about freeing pedophiles and mutilating children, they'd have won total victory long ago," tweeted Kirk on Tuesday.

U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, D-Georgia, earlier this month called Wiener a "communist groomer" after he tweeted, "The word 'groomer' is categorically an anti-LGBTQ hate word."

Wiener has supported gender-affirming care for trans youth and was behind Senate Bill 107, which has made California a "refuge" for trans minors and their parents fleeing prosecution in other states.

For example, in May, Alabama criminalized gender-affirming health care for youth, such as puberty blockers or hormones, which are often given to patients under the age of 19 under the guidance of a doctor. The law, entitled the Alabama Vulnerable Child Compassion and Protection Act, makes doing so punishable to up to 10 years in prison.

"LGBTQ leaders around the country are under attack by toxic, far-right ideologues and elected officials," Wiener said in a statement Wednesday. "These MAGA talking heads -- whose party performed far worse than expected in the midterm elections -- have no meaningful policy solutions for the issues facing our country. Instead, they are focused on slandering and demonizing gay and trans people and using us as scapegoats."

Kirk attacked Wiener on Twitter for what he called California's "radically reduced penalties for child molestation."

"One reason so many of these predators are going free so early is California lawmaker Scott Wiener," Kirk tweeted.

Kirk is referring to California's Senate Bill 145, which has been a target of misinformation passed along on social media by followers of the far right conspiracy group known as QAnon, who say it legalizes pedophilia.

The law does not. The bill aims to reform California's sex offender registry to align young LGBTQ adults with existing laws that apply to vaginal sex. Current law allows judicial discretion regarding the requirement to register as a sex offender for people convicted of statutory rape who have had vaginal sex with someone within 10 years of their age. Wiener's law would bring all vaginal and non-vaginal sex under the same law.

“Charlie Kirk is a prime example of this type of extremist right-wing grifter, and he joined Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene in tweeting about me repackaged versions of centuries-old homophobic lies," said Wiener. "Kirk and Greene are leading a movement to slander gay men and trans people as 'pedophiles' and 'groomers,' and these heinous words have consequences."

1669932366585310.png
Fi2NlpEUYAAVfD0.jpeg

(Tweet, archive)
This faggot ass pedophile sent himself a fucking hate mail and kept the line were you're inserting text is. His excuse was it was a voice-mail and he's typing it out.
1669932410531456.png
1669933491909329.png
 
Hey NBC... Where exactly is the "death threat?"

I could perhaps believe this is real, because "you'll have something coming to you" is so damn bland, I would hope a faker would put more urgency into it.

Curious for any legal kiwis, if you send yourself a "legit" death threat ("I am going to kill you"), and you get caught, can you be prosecuted for making "terroristic threats?"
 
Curious for any legal kiwis, if you send yourself a "legit" death threat ("I am going to kill you"), and you get caught, can you be prosecuted for making "terroristic threats?"
I think that would really depend on how the law was drafted. If it requires an actual victim, no, but if it simply prohibits speech that is likely to cause an imminent breach of the peace or falsehoods that cause a police response, maybe. If not, there are probably statutes in every state prohibiting hoaxes and frauds like this if some profit is sought.

Depending on the full context, though, a legislator might be absolutely immune for any speech if there's any connection however remote to their position as a legislator. That would depend on whether California law controls, or whether it would also violate federal law (where the state law immunity would not hold).

It could very well be, though, that the only penalty would be if he made a false report to the police or federal officers, which would suck, but be pretty typical. In that case, the penalty would have to be at the ballot box.

That said, I'd be pretty sure a creative prosecutor could find something and make an argument this has nothing to do with his legislative office but is purely private criminal conduct.
 
Our reality is so far gone that jokes become actual people.

He's also the dude behind forcing women in California prisons to share their prison cells with fetishistic males who claim to be women.
And the sick fuck who made giving AIDS into a felony. Yes. Drunk driving and giving AIDS!

He is max-level bugman.
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: I Love Beef
Hahaha, do all self important hipster faggots out in California look like scrawny Wojak limpdicked pushover dipshits?
Sounds like the idealized "male" archetype for the double 20s. I swear it feels like it's the model being pushed upon the population.
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: I Love Beef
And the sick fuck who made giving AIDS into a felony. Yes. Drunk driving and giving AIDS!
I'm sure this was a typo or some weird brain-fart but he did the opposite. He turned it from a felony (a serious crime) into a misdemeanor (a minor crime). Probably because he is both a bug-chaser and a bug-spreader. These are our moral superiors, we're told.

Note, he's also super pious about COVID despite deliberately encouraging the spread of AIDS and monkeypox.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Southern Comfort
Back