Shane Holmberg / Shane Presley Holmberg - The Containment Cell for The Breaker of Chairs, Eater of Shoes, Groomer of His Child Bride

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date
Nah. Some of you have reasons for supporting Nick and Vic. Not going to gloat at all.
I've been busy for a minute or two, come back and see this. Mighty mature of you @Shane_Yes_That_One . Then we have...

Shane_Yes_That_One said:
You already know where I stand, but to be completely honest, this case was lost by Ty. Not the fault of anyone here that he and Nick were such fuck ups. I seriously feel bad for Vic having to pick up the pieces of the fallout. I mean he is now on the hook for all of Jamies [sic] costs and fees, plus whatever sanctions the judge deems fit. Then he is going to owe partial fees and costs to Ron, Monica, and Funi.
It should be apparent by now that you and I have walked a good deal of the same flooring. I know you're not reputed as the most intellectually honest (or for that matter honest) person around but I've been around you enough to know you're capable of thinking when your not saturated with alcohol.
  1. The case was not lost. The TCPA is a very preliminary stage in the suit. C'mon buddy, I know it's painful but use the mind you have left and sit on your bias long enough to assimilate what you've observed. It did not go well, I'll give you that but by all indicators that was as much the judge hop scotching around and not following what we all expected. With that, I'd say that there's enough information about Chupp's behavior and record that Ty probably should've prepared for a shit show of a hearing. He didn't but us arm chair quarter backing means as much as you posting here.
  2. What in the world does Nick have to do with anything. Whether he sucks or not had as much bearing on the case as the shoe on your cutting board.
  3. Ron, Monica and Funi were not dismissed totally and may not escape via TCPA. Fees aren't even on the table until the TCPA dismissal is granted and all appeals have been exhausted/abandoned.
  4. Oh yeah, it's also very possible for Jamie to be sucked back in if this thing goes to appeal though I don't think it'd make much sense in a cost/benefit analysis.
And Vic is not a bad guy overall. He is a guy who has serious boundary issues that got worse and worse.
"Serious" boundary issues? Shall we talk boundaries? Shane?

Gotten "worse"? Maybe it's just the sperging that's gotten worse because all of the depersoning plans up 'til now have failed and Sabat reeeeeeaaaaaallllllyyyy wanted Broly and the sheepdog couldn't stand the big bad wolf around his precious little lamb. All the other sheep do just what sheep do and all run after the one in front.

I remember months ago talking to Chambers, Squally, and others about how Vic really was just this guy who came from a different time. When you are famous ego gets to your head, and your non malicious intentions that used to be okay are not anymore, and you just are too old to change.

Which conspiratorial Discord was this? Yours that you got so ratioed in you had to burn it down? Jamie's ruin Vic one? Inquiring minds want to know.
 
Why is he asking questions he knows we want the answers to?

Did you know I'm a tease and a jerk? Since @Shane_Yes_That_One hasn't immediately responded I'll just leave this:

How about copping a feel in a staff meeting one evening, drink in one hand and a breast in the other.

A young lady telling me a similar story but neither wanted to follow up, so there's that.

Insinuating himself into a personnel issue with a criminal complaint that, had it been legitimate, would have derailed any investigation and exposed the convention (A-Kon) to liabilities like obstruction, etc.

The rest is literally hearsay. Maybe he can share some of those juicy anecdotes.
 
Insinuating himself into a personnel issue with a criminal complaint that, had it been legitimate, would have derailed any investigation and exposed the convention (A-Kon) to liabilities like obstruction, etc.
So you're saying he DIDN"T believe the victims, and in fact derailed their chance of having justice by interfering with a possible
investigation by the police BEFORE it even happened?
Was it because Mr. Homberg or one his cronies who was to be investigated? Or was it his idiotic way of doing his 'job' by preventing A-Kon from getting heat?

Regardless, good luck with your consent con Shane, I think you'll be the man for it.
Who better to know the lines of consent, then someone who knowingly violated it multiple times in the past, right?
 
Did you know I'm a tease and a jerk? Since @Shane_Yes_That_One hasn't immediately responded I'll just leave this:

How about copping a feel in a staff meeting one evening, drink in one hand and a breast in the other.

A young lady telling me a similar story but neither wanted to follow up, so there's that.

Insinuating himself into a personnel issue with a criminal complaint that, had it been legitimate, would have derailed any investigation and exposed the convention (A-Kon) to liabilities like obstruction, etc.

The rest is literally hearsay. Maybe he can share some of those juicy anecdotes.
Wow, a child groomer has a (possible, lol) history of sexually harassing women? I'm shocked. Shocked I say.
 
Shoe scarfer seems to like projecting his own deviancy upon Vic. A shame no one is gonna #MeToo him because no one cares about him and he's still a useful idiot for the cause as much as Low T. CPAPi replaced him.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NadeND-001
@Shane_Yes_That_One

1568144189209.png

 
Shane, dude, bro, we know you only come by to bristle your very shitty feathers and to get off on Dopey humiliating you.
Clearly that is your kink. It is your thing. You are a maschocist.
 
Shane, dude, bro, we know you only come by to bristle your very shitty feathers and to get off on Dopey humiliating you.
Clearly that is your kink. It is your thing. You are a maschocist.
Shane loves being proven wrong it almost like he gets off from it.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: GeneralMint
Back