Shit you’re not supposed to talk about. - A guide to political etiquette and the topics of today

Considering jews orchestrated a worker's revolution in Russia and tried to orchestrate one in Germany, but failed after a year of civil war, what prevents the germans from making the same claim to defending their lands as the ancient israelites did?
Nothing? They can claim that if they want and it would be correct.
If you're trying to say that the:
Philistines - foreign aggressors.
Egyptians - foreign aggressors.
Assyrians - foreign aggressors.
Were not invaders of other peoples territory, I don't know. Read some Middle Eastern history.
 
TBF anyone who's paying attention knows they'll all be replaced by chinks within the next century.
Chang is not going to let Jamal dirty up his new home.
The Changs are suffering a demographic nosedive. I suspect a good deal of Africa without useful resources will be abandoned to the joggers, the desperate and the fearless. Still the useful bits will be on Charlie Chang's shortest leash.
 
Pitbulls

We talk about the breed itself as though this is an abstract issue, but the Pitbull lobby is actively is taking unlicensed dogs from ghettos in Los Angeles and St Louis and exporting them all over the country. They change the dogs names multiple times to hide biting records, and activists actively shill these dogs to families as family dogs. The most violent dogs are getting passed around and being abandoned more than ever. We're going to suddenly wake up in a world where the main argument for guns is the roving packs of pitbulls that randomly attack people.
 
From a purely biological standpoint, because a man can impregnate multiple women at once, but a woman can only be impregnated by a single man at any one time, logically it is in the man's best interest to impregnate as wide a range of women as possible, while it is in the woman's best interest to be selective and select someone with the most desirable traits to impregnate her. This is why people are naturally more inclined to judge a women who sleep around than men. This is why many animals, such as lions, live in groups with one male and many females.

Now, do I personally think in a world where 99% of the time we have sex purely for hedonistic pleasure it matters that much? No I don't. I think consenting adults should do whatever makes them feel good. However you can't pretend the different way men who sleep around and women who sleep around a viewed is just patriarchy and doesn't have some inherent logical basis.


There is no privilege but class privilege.
I think this is the biggest one. Let's get real here, a black or white guy walking up the street in a three-piece suit with a briefcase is not getting hassled by the cops. A white guy who looks like a meth head probably is. A black guy who looks like a gangbanger probably is.
 
From a purely biological standpoint, because a man can impregnate multiple women at once, but a woman can only be impregnated by a single man at any one time, logically it is in the man's best interest to impregnate as wide a range of women as possible, while it is in the woman's best interest to be selective and select someone with the most desirable traits to impregnate her. This is why people are naturally more inclined to judge a women who sleep around than men. This is why many animals, such as lions, live in groups with one male and many females.

Now, do I personally think in a world where 99% of the time we have sex purely for hedonistic pleasure it matters that much? No I don't. I think consenting adults should do whatever makes them feel good. However you can't pretend the different way men who sleep around and women who sleep around a viewed is just patriarchy and doesn't have some inherent logical basis.
I often see this bit of pop-science spread around, and it's incredibly cringey to anyone who's actually a biologist or anthropologist or even a "evolutionary biologist". Human babies need an incredible amount of time and resources and care to survive, resources that historically have come from their one-man-one-woman parents, and any uptick in children produced by a slutty man was balanced out by the astronomically higher childhood death rates that his children had. Nature, genetics, and math do no give a single shit if you sleep with 5 woman and have 60 kids, but only 4 of them survive to reproduce themselves, while your neighbor only fucks one woman but has 6 kids that all survive to adulthood. On top of that there are biological advantages to a female having multiple partners, the most important being genetic diversity in her offspring, and that's why there are very few truly polygamist species- if you leave your mate to go off roving, your mate is going to welcome your similarly roving neighbor into her bed, simple as.

Say what you want about the double standard, but humans as a species do the best when they are at least socially monogamist and societies that err from this norm face repercussions. There's a reason why Christian Europe, despite having the Muslim Ottoman Empire as it's neighbor for a thousand years, never had to worry about being outbreed until the invention of modern medicine and the welfare state.
 
Last edited:
Donating money to Africa is fucking useless.

You can throw money at them all you want but that will only teach them to beg for more, give them tools and they will beat each other to shit with it.
You talk about it in public and your supposedly racist for denying them aid.
Motherfucker we've thrown billions of dollars to people who can barely grasp the concept of money

Tl;dr

We gotta herd the nigger cattle.
 
IQ. Specifically whether it's genetic or how it's linked to real-world success
1628016541950.png


The silencing of scientific discourse is especially disturbing. Saying one group is better and crediting stuff to genetics is abit silly, but the fact that its verboten to discuss differences is pretty abhorrent.
 
Back