Should @Null ban @Joan Wasserberg? Why or why not? - The account spoofing Tommie's mom is in violation of 18 USC § 911

[Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg]

Excuse me, but there are boundaries in classical troll netiquette that have been exceeded here, not to mention federal statutes.

Sent to the fat feeder fascist fucktard a moment ago:

oh josh, about your threat, you stupid feeder faggot, i'm not suing you. I'm suing the cops for refusing to prosecute and the hosts for harboring you . I'm filing a criminal complaint for violations of federal law. Like where the fuck do you get off condoning something as illegal and morally reprehensible as a sock puppet of my mother?

Previous conversation on the topic:

Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg​

Person of Interest
Oct 2, 2021

All content you submit, upload, or otherwise make available to the Service ("Content") may be reviewed by staff members. All Content you submit or upload may be sent to third-party verification services (including, but not limited to, spam prevention services). Do not submit any Content that you consider to be private or confidential.

You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which violates any laws. You are entirely responsible for the content of, and any harm resulting from, that Content or your conduct.

These are your rules and there are hundreds, if not thousands of posts in that subforum that are illegal as fuck, such as ones telling me to KYS or trying to incite violence against me. Clips of me "admitting" to things ganked from videos where I'm talking about things I'm being falsely accused of are in violation of both civil and criminal statutes.

Your options right now are to pin a disclaimer notice that nothing in that forum is to be taken seriously because it's toxic fan fiction, shut the whole thing down entirely or get sued for consumer fraud and gross negligence, along with the copyright infringement and defamation nobody has ever been able to make stick to you. You may want to add your legal beagle to this conversation, but nobody else is welcome unless we both agree to add them.

Quote Reply
Report

[IMG alt="Null"]https://no-cookie.kiwifarms.net/data/avatars/m/0/1.jpg?1633092925[/IMG]

Null​

Ooperator​

Oct 2, 2021
Nigger

Like Quote Reply
Report

[IMG alt="Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg"]https://no-cookie.kiwifarms.net/data/avatars/m/10/10086.jpg?1633901757[/IMG]

Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg​

Person of Interest
Oct 2, 2021
fool. you need to put up a disclaimer, shut down the subforum or batten your hatches, Josh. There are federal crimes being committed on that site in violation of your own TOS , schmuck. Lolcow is toast if I file and you could do prison time for criminal negligence and a lot of it, considering the number of corpses confirmed to be connected to this site.

 

[Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg]

lots of congenital stupidity here.

the actual law is this one. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/911

 

[totallyrandomusername]

lots of congenital stupidity here.

the actual law is this one. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/911

Swing and a miss, as usual. Try again.

 

[Penis Drager]

lots of congenital stupidity here.

the actual law is this one. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/911

Given the context in which the account exists, he is not "willfully represent[ing]" anyone because it is expected that everyone here will recognize the obvious fact that he's not actually the pedophile dogfucking tranny named Tommie Jayne Wasserberg.
That is me.

 

[totallyrandomusername]

The retard doesn't seem to understand, even if he could quote the correct legal precedent, which will never happen, he has no standing to bring a lawsuit. The only person that could bring a lawsuit would be Jean Wasserkike or a kike lawyer representing her.

Old Tom, seriously, look up "Standing" as a legal term. Then maybe you will understand why what you are saying is complete horseshit.

 

[Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg]

Given the context in which the account exists, he is not "willfully represent[ing]" anyone because it is expected that everyone here will recognize the obvious fact that he's not actually the pedophile dogfucking tranny named Tommie Jayne Wasserberg.
That is me.

you is wrong and insanely stupid to believe the things you believe about me, dolt. That's my mother's photo directing comments to me calling me son. not legal.

Swing and a miss, as usual. Try again.

you're the one missing some critical screws , son, and your elevator doesn't seem to reach the top floor, but keep trying, your fellow dim bulbs like it.

The retard doesn't seem to understand, even if he could quote the correct legal precedent, which will never happen, he has no standing to bring a lawsuit. The only person that could bring a lawsuit would be Jean Wasserkike or a kike lawyer representing her.

Old Tom, seriously, look up "Standing" as a legal term. Then maybe you will understand why what you are saying is complete horseshit.

nobody is bring a lawsuit, dumbass. we're filing a criminal complaint. As for standing , you're standing in a bucket of bullshit and it may well be that my sister, who is my mother's medical legal power of attorney, may want to do something about it and the estate has an attorney. Maybe you'll learn about rational argument form and irrefutable claims. Calling me a "pedophile - dogfucker" is far from "irrefutable" considering that it's impossible to actually prove at all based on all known and discoverable facts. 99% of your argument rests in disgusting deviant fantasies projected at me. unimpeachable me is going to get the last laugh here, all you self consumed jackasses with delusions of intellect and redeeming social value of your crusades against innocent queer artists.

 

[Joan Wasserberg]

Dear Thomas,

I am your real mother. Please stop telling people I am not. Do not be embarrassed by me son.

Please clean up your apartment.

Shalom, my son.

Your Mother, Joan.

 

[Grub]

Your mom's post are way better than yours faggot. Now listen to her and go to bed before you shit yourself again.

 

[Penis Drager]

That's my mother's photo directing comments to me calling me son. not legal.

You really need to be less vague about this shit. I don't pay enough attention to your drama. Show offending posts.
Also, listen to your mother:

Dear Thomas,

I am your real mother. Please stop telling people I am not. Do not be embarrassed by me son.

Please clean up your apartment.

Shalom, my son.

Your Mother, Joan.

 

[Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg]

You really need to be less vague about this shit. I don't pay enough attention to your drama. Show offending posts.
Also, listen to your mother:

any last words before your congenitally stupid self disappears from my sight, dick brain?

 

[Penis Drager]

any last words before your congenitally stupid self disappears from my sight, dick brain?

Sure. Given the context in which the account exists and the nature of the posts, I would argue that a reasonable person would not plausibly believe the account in question is actually your mother. Any case of mistaken identity would likely be deemed purely unintentional in a court of law (if it even made it that far, rather than being dismissed outright which is the more probable scenario).

SO if you're gonna block me or whatever, that's a mild inconvenience but just make sure to KYS afterward. Okay? Thx!

 

[Jason Wynn]

you is wrong and insanely stupid to believe the things you believe about me, dolt. That's my mother's photo directing comments to me calling me son. not legal.

you're the one missing some critical screws , son, and your elevator doesn't seem to reach the top floor, but keep trying, your fellow dim bulbs like it.

nobody is bring a lawsuit, dumbass. we're filing a criminal complaint. As for standing , you're standing in a bucket of bullshit and it may well be that my sister, who is my mother's medical legal power of attorney, may want to do something about it and the estate has an attorney. Maybe you'll learn about rational argument form and irrefutable claims. Calling me a "pedophile - dogfucker" is far from "irrefutable" considering that it's impossible to actually prove at all based on all known and discoverable facts. 99% of your argument rests in disgusting deviant fantasies projected at me. unimpeachable me is going to get the last laugh here, all you self consumed jackasses with delusions of intellect and redeeming social value of your crusades against innocent queer artists.

Cool story, bro. Stop raping dogs

 

[Just A Butt]

dick brain

lol @Penis Drager he called you dick brain, lol, classic

 

[Billy Beer]

Wanting anyone banned from a forum is the most-limp wristed, sissified fucking faggot shit in existance.

It's text on a screen you fucking puff. Deal with it or log the fuck out.

 

[JethroTullamore]

You should really be nicer to your mother, she seems like such a nice lady.

 

[Trigger Me Timbers]

@Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg is your mother still alive?

How do you know it’s not her?

 

[Tragi-Chan]

you're the one missing some critical screws , son,

Why are you posing as this user’s father? I will be putting in a criminal complaint and pushing for the death penalty. An example must be set.

nobody is bring a lawsuit, dumbass. we're filing a criminal complaint. As for standing , you're standing in a bucket of bullshit and it may well be that my sister, who is my mother's medical legal power of attorney, may want to do something about it and the estate has an attorney.

Is that the sister you raped?

Maybe you'll learn about rational argument form and irrefutable claims. Calling me a "pedophile - dogfucker" is far from "irrefutable" considering that it's impossible to actually prove at all based on all known and discoverable facts.

You’re hardly the first pedo to try the “I’m not a pedo, I just did a couple of pedo things” defence. It never works. On the basis of all the things that you yourself admitted, any reasonable person would conclude that you are, in fact, sexually attracted to children and dogs.

unimpeachable me is going to get the last laugh here, all you self consumed jackasses with delusions of intellect and redeeming social value of your crusades against innocent queer artists.

But you’re hardly innocent, are you, dogfucker?

 

[BlueArmedDevil]

I'm sure getting your estranged family involved with your internet nonsense is totally what they want right now......

 

[Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg]

@Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg is your mother still alive?

How do you know it’s not her?

Because she has never used the internet and doesn't say the absurd things that Sneasel/ @Daisymae sock puppet says.

Cool story, bro. Stop raping dogs

stop believing things that aren't true and i'm not your bro. you barely qualify as a cousin, nugget.

Wanting anyone banned from a forum is the most-limp wristed, sissified fucking faggot shit in existance.

It's text on a screen you fucking puff. Deal with it or log the fuck out.

it's impersonation of a US citizen punishable by up to three years in prison. If the site goes dark forever , you'll know why.

Sure. Given the context in which the account exists and the nature of the posts, I would argue that a reasonable person would not plausibly believe the account in question is actually your mother. Any case of mistaken identity would likely be deemed purely unintentional in a court of law (if it even made it that far, rather than being dismissed outright which is the more probable scenario).

SO if you're gonna block me or whatever, that's a mild inconvenience but just make sure to KYS afterward. Okay? Thx!

that was too rational a response, completely devoid of any libelous remarks. If you want me to block you, you're going to have to do much better than that. Some things are wrong on principle in the troll netiquette book. elderly parents are one of them.

 

[RadioactiveMonkeyMan]

it's impersonation of a US citizen punishable by up to three years in prison. If the site goes dark forever , you'll know why.

Man, I can't wait for celebrity impersonation to finally be illegal too but despite lobbying it seems improbable. If this site goes dark forever, I would imagine it's one of two things;
A) @Null getting bored and tired of it
B) @Null getting gender reassignment

 

[Grub]

Because she has never used the internet and doesn't say the absurd things that Sneasel/ @Daisymae sock puppet says.

stop believing things that aren't true and i'm not your bro. you barely qualify as a cousin, nugget.

it's impersonation of a US citizen punishable by up to three years in prison. If the site goes dark forever , you'll know why.

that was too rational a response, completely devoid of any libelous remarks. If you want me to block you, you're going to have to do much better than that. Some things are wrong on principle in the troll netiquette book. elderly parents are one of them.

@Joan Wasserberg come on bitch, get your little autist underage molesting, dog fucker son to bed. He's sperging again. Fuck bitch, you made that mess of a human being fuck. I know he's a shameful waste of human life but you could try a bit cunt.