After thinking about this moral dilemma for quite some time, I've come to the conclusion that low-intelligent, drooling, completely co-dependent tards, from birth should be sterile. I use to be reject this notion, under the pretense of human rights. However, genetics are a total gamble, and the possibility of a normal person born from a retard is like 10% (depends on how severely retarded the parent is, and I pulled that number out of thin air). OTOH, I'm aware that if governments followed this notion, it would lead to eugenics with them, (imperfect humans) attempting to define what should be an apex human is. For the sake of simplicity, any person who is low-IQ and can't be self-sufficient should be chosen by family and tested by the health officials for sterilization. While different cultures worldwide may have different standards for mental health issues, surely, they would agree with the aforementioned criteria for sterilization. In difference, I disagree with aborting kids who might have a chance of being born retarded, because doctors can't predict the future and this is coming from a person who doesn't believe in overpopulation( except in China & India). So, what do you think?
P.S. I'm aware that if global countries followed this standard, there would be a significant decrease of niggers in Africa and the west, lol.