Should Retards be sterilized?

Should they be sterile?


  • Total voters
    40
No, Hitler tried this and his result was pretty vile. Basically sterilization of tards -> euthanasia of tards -> -> -> genocide of enemy ethnicities.

You're an invalid retard, @Xentrilius; how would you feel about being sterilized? It's probably for the best for society that you don't reproduce, not that you were anyway, but you know what I mean.
Hmm Middleman in this proposed regime would we need to sterilize you, or did you kind of make that superfluous already?
 
Hmm Middleman in this proposed regime would we need to sterilize you, or did you kind of make that superfluous already?
Shouldn't you be watching for SIDS? It'd be tragic to lose a baby at any time, but to lose one while being a harridan online, well, I wouldn't wish that on anyone. I'd laugh, though.
 
@Retink Retunk it's joever for you

Jews will rewrite IQ test to say white goyim get mo children, jews have infinity
He doesn't know.
oyvey.jpg
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Johnny Salami
As if they'd even be able to reproduce with or without sterilization.

Someone would have to want to sex them first, which isn't often.

If anyone is given that power, to sterilize, they'd apply it to anyone they arbitrarily hate, not just people who are actually mentally deficient. Those who, I already mentioned, probably don't reproduce in the first place.

Get sterilized for believing in God, for not supporting transgender ideology, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lowlife Adventures
It's amusing how we can (and do) apply eugenics to everything BUT people.
Because selecting for “better” people is not nearly as straightforward as selecting for more drought resistant wheat, or breeding dogs to have a certain coat color. Even if it starts innocently with say, deleting muscular dystrophy via gene clipping, it ends with rich people breeding clone armies that grow up half as fast and

Scientific racism is just racism that wraps itself in a feather boa of science to cover up and justify the naughtiest bits.

Shouldn't you be watching for SIDS? It'd be tragic to lose a baby at any time, but to lose one while being a harridan online, well, I wouldn't wish that on anyone. I'd laugh, though.
You’d laugh if my baby got cot death because I post on the Farms?
Yea, maybe I’ll make an exception for you.
 
Buck v. Bell is the law of the land. Three generations is enough.
Obviously if anyone tried it would be re-litigated and would be really nasty, but it's there in theory. And it's not like that sort of 100+ year old police power "tool" that everyone thought went away has never come back, see "stay at home" (i.e. quarantine) orders given under state police powers in 2020.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Squawking Macaw
I mean if someone's so retarded they're drooling and completely codependent is there really any reason for them to be sterilized? What are the chances of someone like that reproducing anyway?
You'd be surprised:
Couple with Down syndrome fights for parenting dream (Archive)

Genetically unfortunate people do try to reproduce, and any concerns about unecessary potato babies gets you the usual, the bigot/ableist/eugenicist/nazi label.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Twilight Twill*^
In an Utopia yes, but we have highly untrustworthy governments all over the world, and I can see they would sterilize people for not liking troons.
He wouldn't suck the girlcock, so we had to break out the gelding iron. Now it's the only way he'll ever get to have sex.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Vingle
Letting dumb people breed causes all kinds of problems, so, yes, we should spay all people with an IQ below 85. And it will not be racist, because TECHNICALLY it would apply equally to all races.

pepesmug.jpg
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Twilight Twill*^
Back