Sid Meier's Civilization

Civilization: Chud Edition 🤔
  • every leader is like a "stereotypical caricature" of the "culture" he or she represents
  • any woman leaders are highly "sexualized" to "appeal to the male gaze"
  • no "ages" system
  • nice interface
  • good map design
  • there's Barbarians
  • the American leader is Donald Trump

(Had a "showerthought" of how to make a Civ vidya as "offensive" as possible to SJWs, yet not offensive by 1980s or 1990s standards.)

Add a Jefferson Davis leader for the Americans. You get an economic boost if the Slavery civic is active.
 
I've never heard of the middle reviewer, Kilian Experience with almost 800k subs.

Also couldn't place the accent. Maybe Irish or Scottish based on the name? He did make a Welsh joke in the vid.

Joke review was nice because it moved along and was only 12 mins, even with all the references to that other JRPG Fantasio game.

I thought Kilian might be quietly based, as I heard some passing LGBT jokes in the vid.

But then his comment section is full of leftists only half-joking that Luigi Mangione worked for Firaxis, supposedly worked on the UI team (I'm very skeptical) and complaining about greedy American healthcare.
I have been watching him for years, really like his humor. He has a shitty upload schedule, which hurts him even tough he has a lot of popular videos. If I recall correctly, he is Swedish. His humor is kinda special and rarely falls into based/or leftists, although you could argue that certain jokes, like about female musicians or that Sexy Bitch song, could be interpreted in a certain way. Can't really say what is going on in his YouTube comment section. Probably leftists and troons making themselves at home, like everywhere else.
 
6 is my second favorite behind 4, but sadly all my friends only want to play 5 and they utterly hate any other civ game, i try to show them civ 4 or 3 and they call it "too old/dated". and i never got the utter hype 5 gets, its fine, just i think its overrated
I like 5 more than 6 because even though I dont mind the districts:

1. Art direction is awful. its this bright colorful 'child friendly' aesthetic that doesn't at all appeal to me. Everytime I see a bright-eyed leader in 6 I cant help but think of some chudd-tier leader (Hitler) done in that style, just smiling away with a twinkle in his eyes like he's ready to partake in a sing-along. This also goes the same for the music which doesn't get enough attention to how boring and obnoxious it is.

2. Balance issues. Many changes made to 6 had a lot of knock-on effects toward other aspects of the game, particularly wonders and workers. Because wonders now take up tile slots (Which are themselves increasingly valuable over the course of the game) you now have to weigh the effects of the wonder versus just having the tile. Often times particularly with early wonders this is a bad trade off. Sure you COULD build the collosus as a sea-faring civ but why would you want to? Part of being a sea-based civ is that your coast tiles are exceedingly valuable so why would you waste one on a wonder that just doesn't do that much? On the flip side, Pyramids are actually broken. This wonder is so powerful because of the way workers become increasingly expensive as you build them so anything that gives you additional uses of those consumable workers in the long run means big gains over your opponents.

Naturally 5 doesn't have any of these problems.
 
Civilization: Chud Edition 🤔
  • every leader is like a "stereotypical caricature" of the "culture" he or she represents
  • any woman leaders are highly "sexualized" to "appeal to the male gaze"
  • no "ages" system
  • nice interface
  • good map design
  • there's Barbarians
  • the American leader is Donald Trump

(Had a "showerthought" of how to make a Civ vidya as "offensive" as possible to SJWs, yet not offensive by 1980s or 1990s standards.)
  • The German Leader is Adolf Hitler
  • The Roman leader is either Titus or Hadrian
  • There is a civ based on the Crusader states
  • There is a Rhodesia and Boer civ
  • Arch of Titus is a wonder
  • The barbarians are refer to by various real world ethnic/tribal groups
  • The Arabia civ is lead by Mohammad
  • Romania is a civ and is lead by Vlad III Tepes
  • Gandhi tells you to do the needful and calls you a benchod bastard
  • Tibet is a civilization
  • There is a Timurid civilization
  • The Comanche is the american indian civ
  • Serbia is also a civ
  • and Argentina is a civ
 
It's like that virgin vs. Chad meme...

Civilization VII Minimum System Requirements
  • OS: Windows 10 64-bit or newer
  • CPU: Intel i5-4690 / Intel i3-10100 / AMD Ryzen 3 1200
  • Memory: 8 GB
  • GPU: NVIDIA GTX 1050 / AMD RX 460 / Intel Arc A380
  • DirectX: Version 12
  • Storage: 20 GB
- Civilization VII System Requirements and recommended specs | Corsair (adblock maybe needed)

Windows System Requirements [of Civilization II]
  • Operating System: Windows 3.1, Windows 95
  • Processor: Intel 486SX 33 MHz
  • Memory: 8 MB RAM
  • Graphics Card: SVGA graphics, 256-colors capable, 640 x 480 resolution [*]
  • Sound Card: Sound Blaster compatible sound card
  • Hard Drive Space: 11 MB
  • CD/DVD Drive: 2X CD-ROM
- Civilization II Information and Help | Computer Hope (adblock maybe needed)

* (can also run at 1920 x 1080)
 
  • Like
Reactions: I_Lurk_Here
Something one can get in earlier Civ vidya that can't be done in VII: Earth map, with the Babylonians with current tech in the Middle East, and the French in Europe who are still in medieval times. Oh yeah, and also the Babylonians are working on an interstellar ark.
 
Civilization: Chud Edition 🤔
  • every leader is like a "stereotypical caricature" of the "culture" he or she represents
  • any woman leaders are highly "sexualized" to "appeal to the male gaze"
  • no "ages" system
  • nice interface
  • good map design
  • there's Barbarians
  • the American leader is Donald Trump

(Had a "showerthought" of how to make a Civ vidya as "offensive" as possible to SJWs, yet not offensive by 1980s or 1990s standards.)
German leader is Mr H
 
I won my first game (which was my second random map game) of Old World. Babylonians. It was a desert map and it spawned me on the eastern seaboard in (presumably DUE to me being Babylonian) a forest river valley/oases like area. I had to deal with Egypt forward-settling me real early, so I waged a very early war and managed to kill them. It turned out Egypt was completely fucked over by RNGesus, they were locked away in their own coastal plain, had to reinforce across a desert, were just screwed. I stalemated trying to finish them off, so I called it even (having taken their two colonies that were within my convenient reach) and they became my little buddy because they had invented Manichaeism and, taking their holy city, I became the lord of their own religion.

The rest of the game was rather boring besides the early pressure of having to deal with the shittiest terrain in the world. Greeks managed to storm down my other river valley, and the map is laid out in such a way that you basically have only two adjacencies with rivals. Greeks were a close second and I lost a war badly against them, only cut short by me killing their leader in a duel. But I won on wonders. Had a shit-ton of stone from the nasty sand hill areas the AI was too retarded to make use of.

It's super gay this game, set in Classical Antiquity, has no republics (Carthage, Greece, Rome... 3/7 of them...)

I really do think (I've rambled about this before here) they should make a sequel called New World. Factions by default: British, French, Spaniards, Dutch, Portuguese, Iroquois, Aztecs and Inca. That's only eight compared to seven stock in Old World. Colony as leader/families (Cavaliers, New English, Cortez in Mexico, Pizarro in Peru, etc.). Stateless societies as playable factions as DLC.


Edit: I really dig the premise of specialists. At first I didn't like that population wasn't directly tied to making land usable. But the specialists basically are that. I like the idea that Civics are used to "buy" a skilled workforce and it can refine more and more, role-playing a city coming to develop a reputation for excellent guilds or schools of philosophies or warriors or whatever, even if it's mostly in the background.
 
Last edited:
I remember there being Old World drama on /vst/. Something about the Devs being pozzed. But I didn't really care.
I don't know about Soren (wouldn't necessarily surprise me) but I'm pretty sure his wife works with him and is responsible for a good bit of the writing and the disproportionate amount of female leaders. Still, having played 100 something hours I wouldn't say the game is really pozzed.
 
Back