Sid Meier's Civilization

[Kane Lives]

Let's see how Civ VII is doing with its first expansion.
View attachment 8609358
Well maybe negative attention can still be goo-
View attachment 8609360

So, three months later, how are we doing?

 

[Chickenpolar]

So, three months later, how are we doing?

Time to load up Civilization IV. Gotta pump those numbers up.

Recently I have played Civ 6 a lot. Still such a pleasant game with the map painting of districts and wonders and shit. The sound cues are on point too. If the AI wasn't retarded it would be a great game.

 

[Computer God Autism]

Time to load up Civilization IV. Gotta pump those numbers up.

Unironicallywe need a campaign to get it above Civ VII.

 

[Slap47]

Unironicallywe need a campaign to get it above Civ VII.

Getting Old World above Civ 7 would be more fun.

 

[Computer God Autism]

Getting Old World above Civ 7 would be more fun.

They're both made by Soren Johnson, but Old World is more feasible. I know people who still play Civ IV on their CDs.

 

[Rome's rightful successor]

https://x.com/CivGame/status/2052077586759537081

"We are sorry"

 

[Fig Kommandant]

"We are sorry"

If they do realize their mistake, why not abandon the failed title and simply announce a proper faithful Civ game? I hate this corpo marketing where they go half-way in admitting fault. Rushing a new early access release is probably more viable than keeping 7 on life-support for a few years.

 

[Kane Lives]

If they do realize their mistake, why not abandon the failed title and simply announce a proper faithful Civ game? I hate this corpo marketing where they go half-way in admitting fault. Rushing a new early access release is probably more viable than keeping 7 on life-support for a few years.

There's probably dev egos involved. The failure of Civ 7 is an enormous repudiation of Ed Beach's (and his gaggle of nuFiraxis retards) idiotic direction.

 

[Computer God Autism]

There's probably dev egos involved. The failure of Civ 7 is an enormous repudiation of Ed Beach's (and his gaggle of nuFiraxis retards) idiotic direction.

Well developing a new game also takes immense time and resources. If they go that route they'd have to come up with another gimmick to justify not just going back to an older civ altogether.

 

[Rome's rightful successor]

If they do realize their mistake, why not abandon the failed title and simply announce a proper faithful Civ game? I hate this corpo marketing where they go half-way in admitting fault. Rushing a new early access release is probably more viable than keeping 7 on life-support for a few years.

But hey, they're finally adding a Sid Meier's Civilization mode to Humankind 2.

 

[I Know 孤独のせい]

If they go that route they'd have to come up with another gimmick to justify not just going back to an older civ altogether.

Well to be fair Firaxis are not the only developers that tend to release a new entry into an established series that goes on step forward, a dozen back and a couple sideways. Can't really think of to many games that genuinely are just straight up improvements over their predecessors especially at launch.

There is a simple way to restore a lot of goodwill and trust, but I doubt they would do that. They easily can justify dropping 7 and developing 8 and releasing it in such a state like Civ 5 and 6 were at the end of their respective lifespans. Just release a game with all bells and whistles already in the base game and go from there.