- Joined
- Dec 3, 2023
Tox and simplex are both pretty highly recommended, though i've used neither.IF not signal then what is recommended?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tox and simplex are both pretty highly recommended, though i've used neither.IF not signal then what is recommended?
I'm currently trying to convince my coworkers of this but these CATTLE insist on sms!also obviously kiwifarms DMs and sneedchat are the best most secure messaging services
Tox is private/secure, in that outsiders cannot look into your conversations. It's not anonymous, as you connect directly to the person you're chatting with, and thus they can determine your IP address.Tox and simplex are both pretty highly recommended, though i've used neither.
Would be cool if you could provide some information rather than dumping links like this.
I apologize, was too lazy to make a summary of this. But I posted here because it is another sign Signal might not be as safe as declared. Who knows, they untentionally left this, but like you said, cloudflare isn't known to be privacy friendly so kind of weird to use their service.Would be cool if you could provide some information rather than dumping links like this.
Anyway it's a method of attempting to de-anonymize somebody by baiting their client into loading a Cloudflare cached resource then enumerating through all Cloudflare datacenters to figure out which one cached the item. The logic being that whichever datacenter happened to have the asset cached is one nearby your target.
It's not as exciting as the title suggests as it does presume the target isn't using a VPN endpoint far away from them, the routing to Cloudflare is good and actually using the nearest datacenter, and it does involve interacting with the target by sending them an image attachment.
Stupid as fuck that Signal is using Cloudflare.
Snowden believes the official 9/11 narrative... He's an op like the rest. They all promote the same information in concert: GrapheneOS, Signal, mainstream narratives, controlled opposition narratives - and none ever stray. Of course mainstream movies were made about them and the international intelligence community couldn't catch them in HK or Moscow (what a joke)! Amazing that people just bought Pamela Anderson visiting Julian Assange... Everyone knows women can't resist whistleblowers (and people who shoot others point blank in the face downtown NYC)! /sarcasmMy question is why Edward Snowden endorsed this software. Something is not right if Snowden supported this. I doubt he didn't research the weaknesses of chat applications.
- That the binary executable you are running was produced from a given source code. There is some progress made in this domain, but it remains a largely unsolved problem. The only solution is to compile your software from source, which can be annoying.
- More pertinent to the topic: that the online service you are using is running a given source code. This is likely never going to be solved. The best we got are legal mechanisms such as licensing service software under AGPLv3, which Signal actually licenses their server software under.
A self-hosted privacy app made by a company that had the means and the cash to secure a four letter .com domain?It would be good if some other geeks help us look into Wire (wire.com).