SJW Art and Extremes

Why does Tumblr have an obsession with vitiligo?

  • Suicide Girl model and America's Next Top Model contestant have it, spread on Tumblr, that's why.

    Votes: 670 16.2%
  • Stop fucking asking this this question.

    Votes: 482 11.6%
  • I swear to God I will start deleting these posts.

    Votes: 146 3.5%
  • Goddammit.

    Votes: 395 9.5%
  • ACTUALLY IT'S PART OF A DEEP FALSE-FLAG OPERATION TO TURN ALL BLACK PEOPLE WHITE.

    Votes: 2,447 59.1%

  • Total voters
    4,139
pS4P3Gq1tRW7yAucqbOyw1SnEaGPbaZ2mGXB0d9koZqR0MCGNxf1ewFEn7G6.jpg
yeah i dont have anything to say about this one
 
Dude calm down. There's nothing wrong with making a humanization of a non-human character black; besides why are you focusing on that when the real reason to roll your eyes at it is because they're "nb lesbians"?
I'm not offended because a humanization is black, but I don't think I'm out of line to say that an all white character that exhibits zero "black traits" being made black is at least a little ridiculous. I'm more bothered about it presumably not being done in good faith than I am about it being black at all.

If someone genuinely and honestly felt like a human version of EVE, or Rarity, or Pearl, or any other white-colored inhuman character should be African/African-American, that's not an issue. But considering it's SJW art, I feel like it's all but outright stated that the only reason they're making the character black to begin with is to wank themselves off about how Progressive and Woke and Inclusive they are. It's as frustrating as the big ugly noses and vitiligo and arbitrary transness; it's not that these things existing pisses me off, it's that they're being used solely to virtue signal about how UwU Better Than You the artist is.

I mean, maybe I'm reading too much into it and I'm MOTI but like, this is after 1500-some odd pages of this shit. I don't think I'm being irrational here. D:
 
Since I can't help myself, various Jolynes I found that break my soul





View attachment 1354545
So this artist does a challenge thing where they draw Jolyne with different outfits and aesthetics everyday. They usually draw her in her right skin tone but on this day, in light of the protests, they made her black or something. The theme for that day? Streetwear. I literally can't.
Someone find me a "masturbation addict" pride flag.
 
And they're using the pride flag with the black and brown stripes. I don't really get the fusion of black power stuff with LGBT pride stuff, it's not like your sexuality has anything to do with your race. Those things aren't connected, And the black stripe is supposed to be for honoring people that died from AIDs, and repurposing it seems disrespectful, especially since nobody's skin is literally just jet-black. View attachment 1356957

That specific variation of the flag was made in 2017 for Philadelphia's Pride Celebration as a way of addressing racism in the gay community there since there was a lot of push over that past year towards fixing racial discrimination in their gay district. It had a very specific purpose and relation to where it was created for, and tumblr kinda latched onto it and made it just the new pride flag.
 
I’m guessing that some ace people can actually enjoy doing sexual things but they can’t feel sexually attracted to another person and that’s what makes them asexual.
So, back in the early 2000s, when asexuality was first being identified as a thing, the "old guard" (people who are now in their early-30s to late 40s and identified as asexual at the time) were in agreement that asexuality was similar to bisexuality in that you felt the same to both sexes, but what you felt was "nothing". It didn't mean your dick was broken, or that you couldn't have a sexual relationship, just that you didn't have that attraction that others had.
I even remember one conversation where I watched someone talk a teenager out of identifying as asexual because she didn't want the younger girl to hold herself back or restrict her own sexuality just because she was a late bloomer (she was, btw). That's certainly not the case anymore.
I think the asexuals are probably one of the world's greatest cases of a complete and utter failure to gatekeep, and that's what's gotten us to where we are today.
 
Last edited:
yeah i dont have anything to say about this one
Can a man be a 'sugar baby'? I thought that is reserved for, you know, call girls. Even 'baby' is a feminine term.

EDIT:

Semi-related was that I was met a fair share of people who were under 'asexuality' at that time, before all this was rampant, but the problem was that they haven't met their special someone during their time. They can have sexual relationship and attraction, they just haven't felt an attraction yet. I think this is because the mix of '-sexuality' was popular at the time and teenagers being teenagers, since tumblr and others sites treated being single/not feeling attracted (yet) to others is not normal. The 'asexuality' people got dates later on and removed that term once they figured that out.
 
Last edited:
Can a man be a 'sugar baby'? I thought that is reserved for, you know, call girls. Even 'baby' is a feminine term.
As long as you have a richer person paying for you time and attention it's a sugar baby. It's gender neutral term And only indicates that the time attention is more than just sex allthough that can be part of it. Wierder is that this sugar baby is an ugly old looking man(?) as the baby part comes from the sugar babies being young and usually financially dependent on the wealthy parner at least as far as luxuries go.
 
Back