SJW Art and Extremes

Why does Tumblr have an obsession with vitiligo?

  • Suicide Girl model and America's Next Top Model contestant have it, spread on Tumblr, that's why.

    Votes: 654 16.3%
  • Stop fucking asking this this question.

    Votes: 465 11.6%
  • I swear to God I will start deleting these posts.

    Votes: 143 3.6%
  • Goddammit.

    Votes: 381 9.5%
  • ACTUALLY IT'S PART OF A DEEP FALSE-FLAG OPERATION TO TURN ALL BLACK PEOPLE WHITE.

    Votes: 2,375 59.1%

  • Total voters
    4,017
You can always count on the furries to provide milk. Just make sure it’s actually milk first.
View attachment 7218322
JESUS CHRIST that first one makes me incredibly MATI. I am SO SICK of the discourse of, "UM SWETTY WE'RE JUST TRYING TO EXIST???????" Fucking DARVO gaslighting bullshit.
 
You can always count on the furries to provide milk. Just make sure it’s actually milk first.
View attachment 7218322
Lmao at the censored Nazi imagery in the third panel of the first one. They also always say they’re “literally just existing” while trying to force themselves into so many facets of peoples lives. Including onto children, in more ways than one.
JESUS CHRIST that first one makes me incredibly MATI. I am SO SICK of the discourse of, "UM SWETTY WE'RE JUST TRYING TO EXIST???????" Fucking DARVO gaslighting bullshit.
Also, despite how it's presented, even the figures in the image aren't that unreasonable.
1744653420200.webp
 
Lexindre has updated her comic. The looksmaxxing continues.
good-vibes07.webp
These facial expressions need to become memes. True Bogdanoff energy.

That forearm chub should also be more uniform.
good-vibes08.webp
This girl just gave up on the anatomy halfway. The legs under the table are drawn horribly, Jayce's neck disappears into his shoulders, and what the fuck is going on with his ears? Looks like he's hiding the continent of Africa in there.
good-vibes09.webp
YOOO WHAT IS THAT CHIN

MY MAN LITERALLY BECAME THE CHAD MEME
good-vibes10.webp
Lmao. She gave up halfway on the eyes, too. They don't have their usual intensity.
 
JESUS CHRIST that first one makes me incredibly MATI. I am SO SICK of the discourse of, "UM SWETTY WE'RE JUST TRYING TO EXIST???????" Fucking DARVO gaslighting bullshit.

Honestly, you have every right to be a top hat. We all know that phrase is a cop out for most who say such a phrase. Existing mens doing wht you keep yammering at us to do, "minding our businesses".

It's "mind your business" when expressing genuine worry of kids being told into being something they clearly have little understanding of. It's "mind your business" when critiquing anything about the community that isn't just a facet of "They're not being LOUD AND QUEER ENOUGH AND REPRESENTING MINORITIES MORE!!".

It's "mind your business" when anyone doesn't suck the girlpenis without question. You telling us to "mind our business" is what caused so many kids to get wrecked out of the gene pool because they're told that ruining their healthy bodies are a mean of queer expression and """"""""""human rights"""""""""""".

To the lot of them, they don't want to exist, they want to procreate and make others procreate like them. When you're just letting them "mind their business", they want to inject their questionable and inauthentic personality to people and are expected to get treated like royalty for it.

They always have to think people who want leftists and right wingers to stop getting at each other and just TALK things out without spamming kindergarten insults and having a self-jerking contest on who's the next morally superior superman are just karens who speak in "live, laugh, love".

But it's the gift that keeps on coming. The ideology of love and peace and kindness via letting people do whatever they want and then get surprised when it ends up backfiring.
 
I have seen Asexuals be some of the horniest people alive. Some of them would make a lot of reddit gooners blush
Honestly I still don't even know wtf asexuals really are, even after reading the entire anonymous asexual thread and some other cow threads.

If I understand it Asexual means you just aren't into sex? Okay? Isn't that just an opt out kind of situation? Why does it need to be a "thing" of any kind?

Most hobbies and social clubs don't involve sex, just go and enjoy those things and if somebody approaches you sexually (lol) tell them "no thanks". That's it. I can understand you might feel left out of society sometimes given sexuality creeps into a lot of things but tough shit. I don't care about sports whatsoever and that leaves me out of a TON of conversations, I don't need to form an entire identity and political movement around that.

I don't like sports so I don't think about sports. But asexuals seem to CONSTANTLY post about sex and how they don't participate in it... it comes across as some guy constantly talking about how he's totally not gay and he hates fags. Like do you really? There's also something really odd about it, like they're obsessed with sex while also claiming they don't want it?
 
Honestly I still don't even know wtf asexuals really are, even after reading the entire anonymous asexual thread and some other cow threads.

If I understand it Asexual means you just aren't into sex? Okay? Isn't that just an opt out kind of situation? Why does it need to be a "thing" of any kind?

Most hobbies and social clubs don't involve sex, just go and enjoy those things and if somebody approaches you sexually (lol) tell them "no thanks". That's it. I can understand you might feel left out of society sometimes given sexuality creeps into a lot of things but tough shit. I don't care about sports whatsoever and that leaves me out of a TON of conversations, I don't need to form an entire identity and political movement around that.

I don't like sports so I don't think about sports. But asexuals seem to CONSTANTLY post about sex and how they don't participate in it... it comes across as some guy constantly talking about how he's totally not gay and he hates fags. Like do you really? There's also something really odd about it, like they're obsessed with sex while also claiming they don't want it?
The only examples of asexual “oppression” I’ve really seen is 1. “My parents/friends/whatever keep asking why I don’t have a bf/gf when I don’t want to fuck or even be in a relationship AUGH”, and 2. “My marriage fell apart because my husband didn’t get why I never wanted to have sex, ever”. I do believe that asexuality exists in some forms, ie having a naturally low libido. But I believe a lot of these people just have really skewed views on sex, and a lot of the times are horndogs themselves. It gets even worse if they really tie it to their identity. Pride parades are already pretty bad and cringe, but when you have the asexuals coming in with signs saying “let’s just cuddle! UwU” and “I’d rather eat cake!” it somehow causes the secondhand embarrassment to skyrocket. There’s just an insane amount of smugness and entitlement that comes with them so often.
 
@Grand Duke Snowfall (can't do the highlighting reply thing on my phone, site is being weird) I also think asexuality can be a thing, but I feel like a vast majority of asexuals are either minors, autistic, traumatized/abused, or on drugs that destroy their libido. I'd say probably 95% of them fall into one or more of those categories, but they've either fallen into the Pride sjw circles or are desperate to believe nothing is wrong with them and use the asexuality label to cover the real root of their condition. Personally, if it helps them to cope, that's fine with me because they're not having sex and it's not like that's any skin off my nose, but the ones who are objectively horny and sexual and are blatantly lying about being "asexual," those ones are a bigger problem.
You can always count on the furries to provide milk. Just make sure it’s actually milk first.
View attachment 7218322
View attachment 7218324
View attachment 7218327
Lmao at the censored Nazi imagery in the third panel of the first one. They also always say they’re “literally just existing” while trying to force themselves into so many facets of peoples lives. Including onto children, in more ways than one.
Oh my god I hate how horny the man is drawn in the second comic, it's like his nipples are glowing. I can't stand the twee little T-rex hands the mouthpiece character is doing either, like some cheeky little "hee hurr I'm autistic ain't I cute" nonsense. Ughh this artist is so obnoxious.
 
I can't quote @Mad Hunter 's post, but the story about Bloodborn gave me a lot of flashbacks. It's such a common thing, it probably happened, happens and will happen in every fandom, at least a dozen times.

The way autistic fujos and yurifags bully people for daring to like heterosexual ships is astounding. There were cases of straight shippers acting like this, but they are a tiny minority compared to how many shitstorms those tards stir up no matter where they go. It was one of the things that got me back when I was a clueless cuck ally.

It was never about noble goals like representing a group of people who have been left out for decades, they just want to control the narrative all the time and force every artist to make content that caters exclusively to their fetishes. Even a single piece of art with a het ship that includes their husbando/waifu is seen as a threat. Why do you think they aggressively spam their gay tranny headcanons?

"Uwu, it's just harmless fun, let me enjoy my comfort hc"?

Yeah, right, you lying little fuck.

It's a clear manipulation tactic on their part. Firstly, they're slowly twisting everyone's mind through memes and qweer fan interpretations. Second, they eradicate any dissent by attacking anyone who doesn't share their beliefs with passive-aggressive accusations. Finally, when all is said and done, their now fandom-supported faggotry reaches the ears of the creators, who, seeing money in it, make it canon.

And we all know that when something queer is canon, it's game over. There's a special list of no-no rules that dictates how you must portray these characters from now on. And the moment you dare to do anything different with them, the SJW crowd sees it as fair game to whip up a hate mob against you.

Oh, but the same rule never applies to the confirmed straight cis characters or real people, no sir.

Don't these idiots ever realise that by treating their homo ships like sacred cows, they are still othering gay people, just like in the 50s, but in a toxic positive way? I mean, it's not like I care, but shouldn't they care about not coming off as hypocritical as the people they dislike?

Well, fuck them and their little pc values. I'll say this - your gay ships suck, they're mostly unoriginal fair-haired person X dark-haired person (who's the bottom may wary) dynamic anyway and far more boring and stupid than any basic bitch trad het ship.

Girls should kiss cute boys.
Toxic het superiority.
Femboys are for tomboys.
Buffy men make tender love to women only.
And so on and so forth.


Your religious parents were right to destroy your BL/GL collection and send you to a therapist. Quit eating shit and become normal. :feels:
 
Last edited:
Can't quote your above post but I heavily agree with your "gay ships are as unoriginal and do the very same things het ships do" part of your long post. It's a huge case of "It's more FUN when it's queer!" despite they do the same uncreative, uninspired mill produced junk they often say "Are The Straights Okay?" at.

If the only thing I have to care about in a ship is how gay two people are for each other, then I'm not looking at character, I'm looking at dolls. It's one of the major reasons I'm against shipping characters. They can be used for creative endeavors and good explorations of said character's motivation, personality, and arc, but most of the time, its just used for fanatical AUs and the characters doing generic lovey dovey stuff.

I'm not saying they have to be the way I want it to be. But it sucks it's unnecessarily rare to see a ship that's not just done to fill Tumblr quotas. I always prefer developing a character over who they're kissing or in bed with. It's far more interesting to me.
 
Can't quote your above post but I heavily agree with your "gay ships are as unoriginal and do the very same things het ships do" part of your long post. It's a huge case of "It's more FUN when it's queer!" despite they do the same uncreative, uninspired mill produced junk they often say "Are The Straights Okay?" at.

If the only thing I have to care about in a ship is how gay two people are for each other, then I'm not looking at character, I'm looking at dolls. It's one of the major reasons I'm against shipping characters. They can be used for creative endeavors and good explorations of said character's motivation, personality, and arc, but most of the time, its just used for fanatical AUs and the characters doing generic lovey dovey stuff.

I'm not saying they have to be the way I want it to be. But it sucks it's unnecessarily rare to see a ship that's not just done to fill Tumblr quotas. I always prefer developing a character over who they're kissing or in bed with. It's far more interesting to me.
I will confess, I am a sucker for ships, and enjoy straight and nonstraight ones in equal measure. Imo romance can be pretty fun, but like most things, I prefer it to be in moderation/taken casually. One problem I have with romance arcs a lot of the time is not only when they pander to the insane shippers, but when they overpower literally everything else. For instance, I never watched that Voltron reboot, can’t tell you shit about it. But I definitely remember how insane the shippers were, and how the only thing they ever seemed to talk about was who they want to bang who. Same goes for so much of the ship art I’ve seen on this thread, it’s characters boiled down to basic yaoi/yuri dynamics. Like it’s the only thing they care about. The way I see it, if romance isn’t the focal point of the story, it’s best kept on the down low, have the characters’ personalities mesh well in a way that you can see why they’re together (as opposed to reducing them to stereotypes/caricatures), or not used at all. And basically all fandoms need this quote drilled into their collective brains.
IMG_8972.webp
TL;DR: romance can be pretty fun but holy fuck do so many goddamn people take it way too far.
 
Last edited:
Feminine trans man... So a female.

But they said trans men don't owe you masculinity because uh, they can do the same things they could do as a female but now as a trans man so it makes them even MORE queer and oppressed!

Never could get the logic. Why in the ever loving labels would you contradict the whole thing you probably were super depressed over? "Oh, I'm not a manly man, woe is me..." only to 180 it by doing the very thing you swore to be against but now it's liberating because you're doing it is a DUDEman.

It's the same as trans women who call themselves tomboys. No, you will never deserve the tomboy label as much as you don't deserve the lesbian label.

And you always know whenever someone HCs these people as trans, it's always a latter of "They just FEEL trans." and expect you to not question it further because they know HCing anyone as trans is completely redundant and is purely based on personal fantasies rather than actual characterization. No, Twitter/Tumblr user, a character being their new selves and growing into a better person is not a trans allegory.
 
Last edited:
Honestly I still don't even know wtf asexuals really are, even after reading the entire anonymous asexual thread and some other cow threads.

If I understand it Asexual means you just aren't into sex? Okay? Isn't that just an opt out kind of situation? Why does it need to be a "thing" of any kind
From what I gathered, asexuals dont claim that they aren't into sex. Hence the whole "Asexuality is on a spectrum" I talked about this before, but I'm really starting to hate the whole "Its a spectrum" argument. Don't get me wrong some things like autism can be on the spectrum, but using "Its on the spectrum" for something like asexual is just a cop out way to have an identity without doing anything because these people literally claim that you can have a high sex drive but can still be asexual. This is what I saw from an article.
Screenshot 2025-04-15 134627.webp

So according to these people, you're asexual only if you lack sexual attraction to the person, which is bullshit because doesn't the fact that you're enjoying sex with someone mean you find them sexually attractive at least a little bit? How can you claim to not have a sexual attraction but do all of the above? I'd like to ask these people what exactly is the difference between this and a normal straight person? It goes back into what someone else said, for all of these people's claims about how straight people don't understand "queer" people or how they feel, these people have no understanding of straight people and think were all a bunch of horny apes that literally think about sex 24/7.
Can't quote your above post but I heavily agree with your "gay ships are as unoriginal and do the very same things het ships do" part of your long post. It's a huge case of "It's more FUN when it's queer!" despite they do the same uncreative, uninspired mill produced junk they often say "Are The Straights Okay?" at.

If the only thing I have to care about in a ship is how gay two people are for each other, then I'm not looking at character, I'm looking at dolls. It's one of the major reasons I'm against shipping characters. They can be used for creative endeavors and good explorations of said character's motivation, personality, and arc, but most of the time, its just used for fanatical AUs and the characters doing generic lovey dovey stuff.
I'm starting to notice that the friends and people I talk with on Discord are starting to get sick of shipping in general. One person in particular told me in a public Discord (but doesn't have a whole lot of people in it) that he hates how half the fanbase in this fandom were in hates straight shipping. Even if its one that makes sense, no one cares about it. However, if you ship two same sex characters that have never interacted before, nor would it make sense for them to be attracted to each other, it gets astroturfed liked. I wait for the day where same sex ships get seen in the same light as these people see straight ships "Boring and unoriginal"
 
@Jacques1194

(Because highlight quoting is fucked I gotta @ you.)

I think its in part springing from a desire to have a beneficial or "queer" label mixing with people being ignorant as hell about what terms may actually mean. Some will claim if you are gay you must be attracted to anyone who labels themselves as the same sex. Most often its identity politics being used as a crowbar to try to guilt people for not glorifying their mere existence. So then some will pivot and say they're Asexual or "demi-sexual" as a way to avoid lavishing someone in praise or attention. Then others will ape these ideas without fulling understanding it making the continual telephone game of stupid terms keep-a-churnin'.

Tumblrisms never really died its just wormed its way into everywhere else and put on a thin paper mask.
 
I know Kate Leth has been discussed time and time again on the Farms, to the point where I’m a little surprised that she doesn’t have her own thread. Personally I will always remember her for the shitshow that was High Guardian Spice, and haven’t really paid attention to her since.
That aside, I found her Instagram!
IMG_8974.webp
You can buy this sticker in defiance of Orange Man calling out your tax dollars being spent on troon surgery for mice.
IMG_8975.webp
IMG_8976.webp
IMG_8977.webp
IMG_8978.webp
IMG_8979.webp
IMG_8980.webp
IMG_8981.webp
She advertises her Etsy page on every post too. I checked, it’s mostly cats, gay shit, and Chappell Roan fan merch.
 
Back