- Joined
- Aug 10, 2017
Looks like poor version of earlier Michaelangelo's sculptures of woman, that, well, screamed that artist is gay and never seen naked girl:
![]()
Which is a perfectly reasonable impression to get, because both of those things are actually true. While a label for being gay didn't exist in Michelangelo's time, he only ever showed romantic interest in men, and wrote a number of sonnets to various men he was infatuated with.
As for never seeing a naked girl, that's also true, but not because Michelangelo never dated one. It was considered highly taboo for women to be nude art models at the time. Obviously some artists were still able to use female models in secret, but Michelangelo rarely used them. Out of all of his art, there's only one study of a female nude that survives. Everything else either used a male nude model or was lost to time.
Sorry about the art history sperging.
So Tumblr, having live female models was taboo in Michelangelo's time, but what's your excuse for shitty anatomy?
She wants a guy (or alpaca) to eat her out and fuck her, and there's nothing heterosexual about it!