- Joined
- Nov 26, 2013
I've been thinking not just about SJWism and the new 3rd wave feminism and I think they're simply reflections of a deeper movement in current culture away from concepts like logic, reason and evidence towards more subjective truths.
Basically current culture is moving towards rejecting the older concepts of empirical evidence and constructional logic and embracing a more subjective sense where the view of the person is more important then the objective "Facts".
I copy/pasted some facets of Post-Modernism Enlightenment theory.
- Reality is unknowable
- Because reality is unknowable, truth does not exist
- Because truth does not exist, subjectivity is more valuable than objectivity.
- Reason does not exist, it is a “white male Euro`centric construct”
- Because reason and truth does not exist people should instead act according to emotions
- Individualism and humanism was based on humans being the fundamental unit of rationality. Rationality does not exist, and therefore individualism is wrong. Instead people should act as collectivists for their various racial, gender, and class groups.
- Science is not a tool to make life better for humanity; it is a weapon for the various collectivist groups to dominate each other.
- Language is not a method to communicate knowledge to reveal the truth, it is a weapon to intimidate and silence your enemies.
- With no truth to determine what is right and fair, and no language that can resolve disputes peacefully, disputes between people become a never ending battle of wills that is primarily resolved through force.
All of these sound familiar, too familiar.
I believe that our Western Culture is, for what ever reason, current in the early stages of moving from an Enlightenment culture to this new Post-Modern version. Basically people are moving away from adulthood and back into immaturity by rejection causation of self to protect themselves from any failures they encounter. Emotional well being trumps facts or reality.
Its an outright rejection of reality with a desire to create a more pleasant environment where no challenges are able to injure the ego.
I'm going to keep pondering this; I'm intrigued by how well Post-Mo fits the SJW methodology.
I'm curious where you found those excerpts. In my opinion, the problem with this isn't necessary the leap into a post-modern mindset (I think shifts like this are really inevitable), it's that they have no idea how to handle it tactfully.
Take David Hume. He basically believed that the entire scientific method was a fallacious construct, but he knew that somehow, in spite of all sense, it worked. So there was no reason to throw it out if there was nothing better to replace it with. It's not impossible to retain a post-modern mindset while working with non-post-modern methodology.
Because post-modernism isn't necessarily a debilitating concept. The result of post-modernism is a mass accumulation of narratives and interpretations, and this can have a great degree of personal liberty and freedom to it if viewed the right way. I think SJWs' problem is that they still want to push their narrative over any other instead of being comfortable with that high degree of ambiguity.