SJWism as an opposite to autism

Meriasek

kiwifarms.net
Joined
May 16, 2020
A somewhat interesting take I've seen recently considers the root cause of all the crazy "SJWism" and "feminism" and whatnot as a physiological issue similar to autism and Asperger's Syndrome, and I felt that there was a tiny bit of merit to it. The autism spectrum (not the meme tismo spectrum, but the actual disorder) often causes the afflicted to have trouble with understanding emotions, social cues, and social interactions, and often the afflicted show a lack of understanding of emotions and rely on a purely rational basis.
The argument is that those in the extreme "SJW" corner are somewhat similar in that regard, but in a sort of reversed way; they lack a fundamental understanding of rational and logical aspects, and rely purely on emotional and social bases.
Now of course that is a gross oversimplification given the wide range the autism spectrum (where nobody would accuse CWC or whoever of being overly rational), and also of the wide range of the SJW movement in general, but it is a bit of an interesting thought nonetheless. Around here it's commonly accepted to call everyone and the kitchen sink a tarded autist, of course, but among the general population and using more "normie" definitions, those in the SJW movement who are not already self-diagnosing with the tismo for victim points are not generally considered to be autistic, and are instead taken somewhat seriously.
But what if autism/Asperger's and "SJWism" at large are two sides of the same coin? A physiological issue manifesting with lack of mental abilities in one way or the other, emotional or rational? What if the emotional equivalent of the tismo has always been common in the population, but social pressure (working especially well on those purely guided by social interaction and not by rationality) has kept them sticking to conformity until only recently?
As I said, it is absolutely a massive oversimplification given the wide range the autism disorder and those on the general SJW movement, but I just found this to be a somewhat interesting shower thought.
What if the root of current year "progressivism" isn't actual progressivism, but a mental disorder spectrum that is the functional reverse of hyperrational autism?
What if the functional analogs of tismos stopped being suppressed by the more emotionally/rationally balanced majority of society and started to force their hyperemotional ways unto the general populace?
Yes, I know we all consider the more extreme members of said movements to be severely autistic already, but let's consider that being hyperemotional is far more commonly encountered and brushed off as merely "normal" than being unemotional.

Ok, lots of words for something actually simple, I guess? Gimme all the puzzle pieces already. And then discuss, because I don't actually know enough about the actual autism spectrum disorder and how it works and what it does to actually evaluate this idea properly. I'm sure one can come up with a lot of explanations using brain hemispheres and amygdala and lizard brains and shit, but that still sounds rather laymen-y and oversimplified.
 
Op thinks that being a SJW is a form of autism.
I don't actually think that, just heard the argument being made and found it interesting and worthy of discussion.
A bit like a function that is symmetric at the y-axis. Hyperemotional instead of hyperrational. Since the autism spectrum is broad and not quite well defined, it's pretty much hopeless to try and describe it like this, but I thought maybe the idea of thinking of certain ideas on the extreme left side of the political spectrum as originating from an extreme focus on emotions and tribalism was worth entertaining for a bit. Not to be taken as an actually serious analysis or anything, just a shower thought of sorts. I might have also been slightly tipsy at the time of writing.

/Edit:
Hardcore "SJW" people are oversocialized and constantly seek attention too, but you couldn't say literal autistic lolcows are antisocial, if that was the case they would not be lolcows in the first place.
Indeed. The whole thing breaks down upon closer inspection. Unless one tries to bring on some sort of horseshoe theory where the hyperrational and hyperemotional ends of the tismo meet again at the extreme ends. But in the end that's basically trying to fit a model to data via adding more variables instead of considering the validity of the model.

/edit2:
I guess the idea is more that "SJWism" is kind of a similar disorder to mild Asperger's (but in the other direction), but since a stronger emotionality doesn't necessarily interfere with daily life it's not really treated or even recognized as a disorder? Dunno. As I said, just a half-baked shower thought.
 
Last edited:
You can do these kind of "what if" brain experiments and they can be a fun thing to entertain yourself with.

As always the degree to which you can suspend disbelief depends on your experiences and knowledge.

In this case you would know you were dead wrong for how extreme sjws and such are quite likely to be austists and autists seem to be more susceptible to the sexuality propaganda.

Being autistic doesn't make someone more logical as much as it makes them color blind to certain things like emotions and other cues. They may seem more logical, but it's just like how a blind man seems to hear better, but rather it's that he pays more attention. It's just as likely for an autist to be bad at logic.

Besides, one can use logic to justify almost any political position since it is much more an issue what sources you choose to trust. And there is no one foolproof way of doing do. A commonly accepted way is to use publications, like mainstream news. You only need to pay attention to that for a while to understand that that is a horrible thing to trust. And that's the commonly accepted part.

No, I don't think sjws are more emotional or less logical. I think the defining trait is who they choose to trust.
 
Back