The "Kuk" comic is just baffling. At first I thought we're supposed to sympathise with the soldier but he's obviously a pretty horrible person what with being an overt Neo-Nazi. Then I thought, maybe the idea is that his girlfriend cheating on him drove him to Nazism, but nope, he was like that back when she was being faithful to him. The person who comes off best in the comic is good ol' Chad Thundercock because the worst thing he does is facilitate the girlfriend's cheating, which is a petty minor crime in comparison to, you know, being a Nazi.
If I had to guess I'd say the moral is "women cheating on their boyfriends makes their boyfriends into Islamic terrorists", but if so it's terribly executed, because it's in no way clear that the guy in the last panel is an Islamic terrorist as opposed to a non-terrorist Muslim (or just a guy with a beard and a hat, for that matter), and he was clearly already an awful person anyway, something the comic's author took pains to point out.
So I guess the real moral is "Women cheating on their boyfriends makes people who were one kind of horrible into a different kind of horrible", which is not exactly a stinging indictment of cheating. Swapping Neo-Nazis for Bin Laden-wannabes is pretty much a no-score draw as far as most of us are concerned.
2/10, would not incel
