The claim that looks are subjective is misleading. It is strictly true, in the sense that there will be some limited individual variation in the appreciation of beauty. But, it is disingenuous to claim there are not attributes that are seen as almost universally attractive. Of course, this is an empirical matter. So, let's see if there is any sort of literature on the topic.
http://www.pnas.org/content/110/17/6925.abstract
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/21/attractive-men-study-shows-women-lured_n_1291631.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1380265/Men-feminine-faces-likely-hit-women.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_attractiveness
Generally, women agree on what constitutes an attractive male. To deny this seems at odds with the current scientific dynamic. And, to call the world's leading male model unattractive is still endorsing one of sluthate's beliefs, feminine hypergamy. But, of course, most females wouldn't classify Sean O'pry as 'unattractive.'
There is also the further topic, the discussion of how important physical appearance is. But, I'll leave that for another time.