Sluthate.com

Status
Not open for further replies.
0AQEw5M.png

SG4iA2Q.gif

QEIa75F.png

lQZNT2X.png

MF9dVUp.png

mJ0cGwu.png

tGV2Alo.png

GJ2nsAX.png

sbTuiiC.png
Hey Devin Townsend!
 
So you guys think you could do just as well with women as a tall, broad-shouldered, Brad Pitt-faced man if only you had a "better personality"
The sheer level of delusion required for this belief makes me think none of you have left the basement in years...

Go outside. Reality does not work that way.
 
Sluthate has good and bad, like any forum. Probably more bad than most forums I've frequented, but a lot of really fucking insightful good. The borderline/not-so borderline pedophiles are bad. The racists are bad(but they're made fun of and called stormfrontcels on the regular). The name of the place is bad. But the discussions of aesthetics are really really good. It's probably the best place on the internet for discussions regarding male aesthetics and sexual attraction, and while it's clear that a lot of people here will dismiss everybody who goes in depth on that topic as gay, it's actually crucial for improving yourself, with or without surgery. If you know what women want, then you'll know how best to improve yourself. And while there's a ton of debate over "what women want" and there always will be, it should be pretty obvious to anyone that isn't completely deluded that men with certain facial and bodily features are favored by women. It is also well documented and pretty obvious if you pay attention that better looking people are treated better in general. Of course, confirmation bias can go overboard here, but the general principle is an almost undeniable truth. Personally, I don't see what's so bad about recognizing these truths and discussing their application in real life. I'm sure a lot of it comes off as aspie, which is what I thought when I was first bombarded with talk of "maxilla" and "gonial angle", but the same would be true if you walked in on a bunch of astrophysics majors talking about the Chandrasekhar limit or some other shit. SHers are not scientists, but a lot of it is backed up by empirical data and some "experiments"(Tinder with very good-looking people). I don't think I'm as bitter as a lot of SHers since I have sex with "prime females"(another phrase which is aspie af), but that doesn't mean I can't see the the truth in a lot of the discussions. It actually makes it easier to see the truth in a lot of SH's theories. This post is probably too far gone with shitposting for anyone to care, but I feel like SH has some very interesting and truthful material under a veneer of shitposting that is hard not to defend.
 
Sluthate has good and bad, like any forum. Probably more bad than most forums I've frequented, but a lot of really fucking insightful good. The borderline/not-so borderline pedophiles are bad. The racists are bad(but they're made fun of and called stormfrontcels on the regular). The name of the place is bad. But the discussions of aesthetics are really really good. It's probably the best place on the internet for discussions regarding male aesthetics and sexual attraction, and while it's clear that a lot of people here will dismiss everybody who goes in depth on that topic as gay, it's actually crucial for improving yourself, with or without surgery. If you know what women want, then you'll know how best to improve yourself. And while there's a ton of debate over "what women want" and there always will be, it should be pretty obvious to anyone that isn't completely deluded that men with certain facial and bodily features are favored by women. It is also well documented and pretty obvious if you pay attention that better looking people are treated better in general. Of course, confirmation bias can go overboard here, but the general principle is an almost undeniable truth. Personally, I don't see what's so bad about recognizing these truths and discussing their application in real life. I'm sure a lot of it comes off as aspie, which is what I thought when I was first bombarded with talk of "maxilla" and "gonial angle", but the same would be true if you walked in on a bunch of astrophysics majors talking about the Chandrasekhar limit or some other shit. SHers are not scientists, but a lot of it is backed up by empirical data and some "experiments"(Tinder with very good-looking people). I don't think I'm as bitter as a lot of SHers since I have sex with "prime females"(another phrase which is aspie af), but that doesn't mean I can't see the the truth in a lot of the discussions. It actually makes it easier to see the truth in a lot of SH's theories. This post is probably too far gone with shitposting for anyone to care, but I feel like SH has some very interesting and truthful material under a veneer of shitposting that is hard not to defend.

Please organize your posts in a readable format, this is a forum not a blog.
 
. I don't think I'm as bitter as a lot of SHers since I have sex with "prime females"(another phrase which is aspie af), but that doesn't mean I can't see the the truth in a lot of the discussions..


YOU MEAN YOU HAVE SEX WITH 12-16 YEAR OLDS?

Seriously man don't associate with these guys.
 
You know you are ugly. I know I am a tall, hot blonde woman. I'm laughing at you right now. You are a joke.

You are laughing at the forum which consists 90% of guys like the ones you said look good. So far you've claimed good looks for every poster, a Bieber (Bieber is still good looking but in a different way) and good looks with an evil vibe in other words jock looks.

You might be able to laugh at poor old me, though.
 
So you guys think you could do just as well with women as a tall, broad-shouldered, Brad Pitt-faced man if only you had a "better personality"
The sheer level of delusion required for this belief makes me think none of you have left the basement in years...

Go outside. Reality does not work that way.

Pretty sure such things like Individual tastes will prove that theory wrong.

And if its so easy to get laid, Why haven't you? Or maybe you have and are projecting so hard its on the moon because it wasn't what you was expecting?
 
So you guys think you could do just as well with women as a tall, broad-shouldered, Brad Pitt-faced man if only you had a "better personality"
The sheer level of delusion required for this belief makes me think none of you have left the basement in years...

Go outside. Reality does not work that way.

Well when his "personality" amounts to "Waaaaaaah, girls don't like me. Waaaaaaah. ."

Yeah. I imagine they could do better.

To quote a Kinkster I once knew "A man with a 5 inch dick is more of a man than a sissy with a 8 inch dick."
 
You are laughing at the forum which consists 90% of guys like the ones you said look good. So far you've claimed good looks for every poster, a Bieber (Bieber is still good looking but in a different way) and good looks with an evil vibe in other words jock looks.

You might be able to laugh at poor old me, though.
Where are you getting this from?
Your statistic is probably backwards— 90% of you look unattractive, more like it.

Look up the OK cupid study.
 
But you and other girls here called 90% of our userbase good looking... So it's not much to be sad about here. Even Meowth picked SH'ers who are "cute" to her like Harpoon. You're complimenting us all, and you even managed to summon Rat.
%90 of you? Really? So your cite is actually just a handful of pedophiles and groomed boys?

Us stroking your egos because of your poor self-esteem doesn't mean that we wouldn't punch you in the face IRL if you ever said any of this shit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back