- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
Sluthate.com
- Thread starter Arctic
- Start date
- Status
averageGuy
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2015
You can read some theories about women's sexual strategies in various scientific articles. These theories do confirm partly the RedPill. Another strategy is called alpha fucks/beta bucks. Women use men, who are very attractive, called "alphas" for good genes, because they are not able to bind them, whereas betas are used for safety and comfort.
There is more then one study that proves, that women tend to avoid their own husband while ovulating. Other studies show the preference for masculinity in men's faces when ovulating. Women are designed to cheat by nature. Men on the other hand try to avoid infidelity, because they do not want in invest in another men's children, thats the primary reason why men avoid "sluts" as relationship material. If they wouldn't, they would have been distinguished in the process of evolution, because they failed in reproduction.
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2013
Maybe for you, but most of us don't let our genitals control our lives.
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2014
ne enenen
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2015
god you guys are dense
the point of life is sex/reproduction biologically speaking
all that means is, you're wired to care deeply about those things
doesn't mean that life can't have other meanings from different perspectives
stop taking shit literally
the point of life is sex/reproduction biologically speaking
all that means is, you're wired to care deeply about those things
doesn't mean that life can't have other meanings from different perspectives
stop taking shit literally
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2014
again, nope, dont try to put survival instict and the Suspending bridge effect on this because those are psychological moments
and im now seeing the problem, what girl would give a damn about you if the only thing that you said is SEXSEXSEXSEXSEXSEXSEXSEXSEXSEXSEXSEXSEXSEX
come on say RAPE APE
O
ON 190
Guest
kiwifarms.net
I can't read bedtime stories to all of you at once.
Shidoshi
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2015
Hey guys, I hope you are doing well.
My version:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- 0 - 0.99 - extremely rare, I've seen only a few of these in my whole life, these are usually patients with severe life-threatening or debilitating conditions, they die prematurely or suffer isolated from the outer world (the pictures show the extreme end of such conditions)
- 1 - 1.99 - usually syndromatic patients, whose facial development is compromised since birth, but sometimes even the victims of tragic injuries or diseases, may be mentally retarted and otherwise handicapped, very rare
- 2 - 2.99 - these are often called "very ugly" by the majority of people, they often lack the sufficient facial harmony and have one or more bizarre/grotesque features, but their face is "humanly" proportionated, rare ones
- 3 - 3.99 - these aren't good looking either, but you won't feel disgusted by their presence, they are simply not aesthetically pleasing euphemistically speaking
- 4 - 4.99 - the lower end of average, broad range of population, bland, need to compensate when they decide to compete in looks-inclined fields/contexts
- 5 - 5.99 - the upper end of average, broad range of population, can be good-looking for someone when they establish connection with and/or maintain/groom themselves sufficiently
- 6 - 6.99 - the area of "good-looking" ones, due to rarity of 8+, there is a significant loss of perception of reality and people think this subgroup is somewhere around 7.5+, thus the welcoming acceptance and compliments
- 7 - 7.99 - rare, most of the people consider the ones from this spectrum to be very handsome/beautiful (8+ distortion mentioned above), they are very successful in real life regarding to looks-inclined fields/contexts
- 8 - 8.99 - model tier individuals, very rare, when you come into contact with such a person, you won't forget him/her, for obvious reasons, these people often monetize their rarity, thus their presence in "exposed" areas (media platforms, movie industry, modelling, etc.), you won't see these in real life much unless you visit vip parties, elite restaurants/clubs/boutiques, rush downtown areas and other places where these concentrate
- 9 - 9.99 - the ceiling of beauty, unique features synthesized into the epitome of harmony, you may feel hypnotized by their presence, attributes like "heavenly", "noble", etc., extremely rare, hidden in obscurity, waiting to be discovered, leading persons in looks-oriented fields
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Practically speaking, individuals normally differentiate between good-looking/handsome, average/normal and below average/ugly and expand this "model" to the whole scale when asked. Usually, they cannot see the subtlety and nuances precisely, they either overrrate the good-looking ones or underrate the below-average ones. Their own self-image is almost universally distorted and leans towards the range of 7, which is illustrated in the documentary below.
According to normal distribution, being 7 is quite rare and impossible at such a rate. We can roughly compare the problematic of this discrepancy to the distribution of intelligence. You don't meet somebody with an IQ of 130+ very often and therefore consider the bright people with an IQ between 120 - 130 to be very clever. You simply overrate their brightness, which exists, but can be easily overshadowed by the intellectual giftedness of the individuals from the upper end, that are very rare, but they do occur here and there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
With regard to sexual attraction (or sex-appeal) Wikipedia says:
Based on my observation, sex-appeal is interconnected with the level of physical attractiveness to a degree, but this dependence is not too tight. Rating of sex-appeal is definitely more complex and subjective, as there are many factors involved, not only the facial attractiveness itself. One cannot accurately rate the sex-appeal of the individual from the static picture, the height, smell, mimic and gestures, elegance, character of movements, the overall body language, "sexiness of the brain" and a few other variables need to be taken into account. Most importantly, sex-appeal is related to the sexual orientatition, so the interpretation is affected by the sex you are attracted to (you less likely estimate the sex-appeal of the sex you are not attracted to).
I agree the facial expression, body language and other aspects of the sexual attractiveness play a bigger role in sum than the looks alone. We can say an involuntary celibacy is caused by the non-existent sex-appeal, whose etiology varies case by case basis.
You may be sexually appealing to somebody more than the individual, whose facial ratings is higher than yours. This is a very important fact many people ignore or don't see.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
One of my friends thinks this naturally good-looking girl we've both met is bland and unexciting. She was the girl from the Eastern European countryside with no makeup applied, no fancy haircut or dress. He was not interested to have sex with her and talked about some short low-class blonde from the caffeteria instead.
Have you ever wondered why there is such a disproportionately high number of a seemingly attractive women in one place? Let's say you've just entered some prom as a stranger and most of the women looked fabulous. Well, the chances their life-long experience with "looking good" hobby (i.e. hair, makeup & dress) outweighed their "true" physical potential are higher than the alternative all of them would naturally exceed the fictional 6+ threshold. Since you don't have enough time to evaluate them properly, you only notice their superficial polish. The examples below show some makeup transformation.
So..............
Do you agree or disagree? Please share your thoughts.
My version:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- 0 - 0.99 - extremely rare, I've seen only a few of these in my whole life, these are usually patients with severe life-threatening or debilitating conditions, they die prematurely or suffer isolated from the outer world (the pictures show the extreme end of such conditions)
- 1 - 1.99 - usually syndromatic patients, whose facial development is compromised since birth, but sometimes even the victims of tragic injuries or diseases, may be mentally retarted and otherwise handicapped, very rare
- 2 - 2.99 - these are often called "very ugly" by the majority of people, they often lack the sufficient facial harmony and have one or more bizarre/grotesque features, but their face is "humanly" proportionated, rare ones
- 3 - 3.99 - these aren't good looking either, but you won't feel disgusted by their presence, they are simply not aesthetically pleasing euphemistically speaking
- 4 - 4.99 - the lower end of average, broad range of population, bland, need to compensate when they decide to compete in looks-inclined fields/contexts
- 5 - 5.99 - the upper end of average, broad range of population, can be good-looking for someone when they establish connection with and/or maintain/groom themselves sufficiently
- 6 - 6.99 - the area of "good-looking" ones, due to rarity of 8+, there is a significant loss of perception of reality and people think this subgroup is somewhere around 7.5+, thus the welcoming acceptance and compliments
- 7 - 7.99 - rare, most of the people consider the ones from this spectrum to be very handsome/beautiful (8+ distortion mentioned above), they are very successful in real life regarding to looks-inclined fields/contexts
- 8 - 8.99 - model tier individuals, very rare, when you come into contact with such a person, you won't forget him/her, for obvious reasons, these people often monetize their rarity, thus their presence in "exposed" areas (media platforms, movie industry, modelling, etc.), you won't see these in real life much unless you visit vip parties, elite restaurants/clubs/boutiques, rush downtown areas and other places where these concentrate
- 9 - 9.99 - the ceiling of beauty, unique features synthesized into the epitome of harmony, you may feel hypnotized by their presence, attributes like "heavenly", "noble", etc., extremely rare, hidden in obscurity, waiting to be discovered, leading persons in looks-oriented fields
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Practically speaking, individuals normally differentiate between good-looking/handsome, average/normal and below average/ugly and expand this "model" to the whole scale when asked. Usually, they cannot see the subtlety and nuances precisely, they either overrrate the good-looking ones or underrate the below-average ones. Their own self-image is almost universally distorted and leans towards the range of 7, which is illustrated in the documentary below.
According to normal distribution, being 7 is quite rare and impossible at such a rate. We can roughly compare the problematic of this discrepancy to the distribution of intelligence. You don't meet somebody with an IQ of 130+ very often and therefore consider the bright people with an IQ between 120 - 130 to be very clever. You simply overrate their brightness, which exists, but can be easily overshadowed by the intellectual giftedness of the individuals from the upper end, that are very rare, but they do occur here and there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
With regard to sexual attraction (or sex-appeal) Wikipedia says:
Based on my observation, sex-appeal is interconnected with the level of physical attractiveness to a degree, but this dependence is not too tight. Rating of sex-appeal is definitely more complex and subjective, as there are many factors involved, not only the facial attractiveness itself. One cannot accurately rate the sex-appeal of the individual from the static picture, the height, smell, mimic and gestures, elegance, character of movements, the overall body language, "sexiness of the brain" and a few other variables need to be taken into account. Most importantly, sex-appeal is related to the sexual orientatition, so the interpretation is affected by the sex you are attracted to (you less likely estimate the sex-appeal of the sex you are not attracted to).
I agree the facial expression, body language and other aspects of the sexual attractiveness play a bigger role in sum than the looks alone. We can say an involuntary celibacy is caused by the non-existent sex-appeal, whose etiology varies case by case basis.
You may be sexually appealing to somebody more than the individual, whose facial ratings is higher than yours. This is a very important fact many people ignore or don't see.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
One of my friends thinks this naturally good-looking girl we've both met is bland and unexciting. She was the girl from the Eastern European countryside with no makeup applied, no fancy haircut or dress. He was not interested to have sex with her and talked about some short low-class blonde from the caffeteria instead.
Have you ever wondered why there is such a disproportionately high number of a seemingly attractive women in one place? Let's say you've just entered some prom as a stranger and most of the women looked fabulous. Well, the chances their life-long experience with "looking good" hobby (i.e. hair, makeup & dress) outweighed their "true" physical potential are higher than the alternative all of them would naturally exceed the fictional 6+ threshold. Since you don't have enough time to evaluate them properly, you only notice their superficial polish. The examples below show some makeup transformation.
So..............
Do you agree or disagree? Please share your thoughts.
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2014
Christ man I was making a joke. I didn't ask for your creepy rhetoric.
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2013
I don't know if you know what a strawman argument is. I meant you claiming that we are emphatic about "only personality matters" is simply not true. It's a strawman you have built to attack rather than attacking the shit we're actually claiming.
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2014
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2015
ne enenen
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2015
so what are you claiming, if not that "personality matters more" ?
O
ON 190
Guest
kiwifarms.net
I am, thanks. How are you doing?
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2014
There's no faster way to say, "I'm autistic", then to rate everyone in society on a numbered scale.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2015
"Oh you know, trying to appeal to a high standard some men have told me to to conform too on the websites which grooms young adults into insecure males"
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2014
im claiming that you are obsessed about sex, that sex is not important to the point of whine 24/7 about it and Mirror's Edge is one of the best games out there
- Status