- Joined
- Dec 29, 2014
IQ's can very between test actually because there are multiple scales. They're not objective.
Sluthate.com
- Thread starter Arctic
- Start date
- Status
ne enenen
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2015
we've actually given you the (autistic, scientific, data-based) studies.
I say it's your turn to prove your own beliefs
go prove that personality matters more, empirically
I say it's your turn to prove your own beliefs
go prove that personality matters more, empirically
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2014
An actual study by ukmedix.com
A website with a name kool enough to make the 90's proud
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2015
I think we're proving that by being fly as fuck.
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2014
That's not what we've been arguing. We've been arguing that there are multiple factors and not just looks. Also the problem is we don't care enough.
- Joined
- May 25, 2013
That's probably why they only talked to 1,994 people in their poll.
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2014
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
My personality is beyond your pathetic metrics of success.
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2014
IQs also don't show a person's knowledge or level of common sense
You could be the smartest potato in the world, you'd still be a potato
And you, @sephon will always be an autistic sluthater
ne enenen
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2015
ad hominem (directed at that site)
if you want to make this really aspie... go discredit their methodology
sephon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2015
lol I actually don't know my real IQ... I got 126+ (cannot go higher) on the Swedish Mensa practice test.
I've gotten anywhere from 126-133 on different online tests as well.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2015
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2013
ne enenen
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2015
Any study "proving" personality matters would also be "pseudoscience" if you're gonna dismiss all of psychology
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2014
I've actually read this one before. Weirdly enough I've seen most of what you guys have posted before. Yeah pretty people get stuff easier, but we never said they didn't. We said that there are multiple factors. I don't know why you guys keep trying to argue this. The article never says no ugly people ever get hired. I think you guys are totally missing the point that I already explained.
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
Do you even operationalize?
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2014
OKcupid is not a psychology site
DailyMail is not a psychology site
Also you don't prove things in science. You support.
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2014
Maybe if I could find the study behind all the voodoo drugs they seem have for sale
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2014
That's not how it's supposed to be used it means if you find one counterexample to a conjecture that the conjecture is not valid even if it may be acceptable to use as a rule of thumb.
Con: "No scotsman could commit murder"
A: "Police are on the lookout for murderous scotsman as we speak"
Re: "Well you know what I mean, no true scotsman"
Using logical fallacy and most tools of debate on the internet is usually a bad idea unless you can express the same in everyday language.. this is not formal debate. Examples might be
SHer: This medical procedure has been proven to be perfectly safe and there is plenty of anecdotal evidence that it's effective
Me: If it'd been proven safe there would also be formal reporting on it's effectiveness generated as part of the same process. You're lying or you've been lied to.
SJW: I am here to teach you men not to rape. First we will discuss the rapist who is generally a psychopath with a long history of other crimes.
ME: Psychopaths are impossible to reform and commit these other crimes because of their pathology?
SJW: Yes of course.
ME: It stands to reason that unless rape is somehow special that you cannot teach me not to rape because rapists are psychopaths. If you can teach me not to rape you can probably teach me not to commit most crimes. We have at least 1000s of years of failure attempting to do this. I'm insulted that you're here getting paid.
The logic isn't impeccable here but it doesn't have to be because it's a faggy internet argument anyhow. Attempting to will just devolve quickly into a debate about debate like this.... most attempts at calling someone out for using a logical fallacy on the internet are 1) usually totally misapplied and 2) usually good examples of the fallacy fallacy, just because your opponent commits logical fallacy doesn't mean he's wrong and often times statements that contain logical fallacies still hint at the truth. We're not in court and we're not Socrates.
- Joined
- May 25, 2013
I incleled my operationalized fiboflavs.
- Status