SlutHate II: Hatred Edition - Now Known as "RedPillTalk"

[Rin]

@Humanoid Email Address LOL @ Sluthate trying to push anything. No one forces anyone to believe anything. If you join sluthate you probably believe in the "redpill" or some aspects of it,if you don't join you probably have a different opinion.

"Attempting to convince Others" Exactly who did that? I haven't seen anyone start a magic crusade about the "red pill".

Have you even read any of the posts made by your fellow sluthaters? Several of them have tried to convince us of the truth of their ideals.

 

[Dove]

@Nara What was that,2 people? Okay,certain users attempted to "convince" kiwifarms,a forum that majority of people doesn't even know exists. What's the big deal about it¿?

 

[DrChristianTroy]

@Dr Boe Jangles Esq. Thank you. Very proud of being boring

Congrats on making one of the wackest statements of the whole thread. No wonder women avoid your #SWAGless ass.

 

[Positron]

Some of the subtleties of SlutHate - dare I call them that - are lost on you chaps because of the very selective nature in which you 'assess' the site, true to your own forum principles. You miss for example the benefit of total freedom of speech; even extending to the abuse of forum admin. It serves as an excellent place to vent, to let loose; usually on the themes of frustration around relationships and sex - or the lack thereof.

You've described a hugbox. It is one thing to vent out your frustrations; it is quite another to indulge in crackpot theories (the all-important maxilla; that looks are the be-all-end-all of sexual attraction; that personality is nothing but a consequence of looks...not to mention the torrent of bad evo-psych). To allow falsehoods to propagate with no criticism, in the name of "freedom of speech", is not going to benefit anyone.

And even emotional relief has to have a limit: offering a word of encouragement to someone down and out is awesome; to join him in cursing some imaginary bogeyman ("sluts"; "Chads") is just silly. And to sympathize with or identify with spree killers (like the co-pilot who crashed a plane on purpose) -- sorry man, your forum is inviting ridicule.

 

[Ruin]

The salty virgins realized unfunny trolling won't get the thread removed so they're trying to be diplomatic now?

 

[A Ghost]

[a forum that majority of people doesn't even know exists.

i think with the amount of threads you guys have on us most of the people on sluthate have attest heard of us

 

[Norwood Crematorium]

You've described a hugbox. It is one thing to vent out your frustrations; it is quite another to indulge in crackpot theories (the all-important maxilla; that looks are the be-all-end-all of sexual attraction; that personality is nothing but extensions of looks...not to mention the torrent of bad evo-psych). To allow falsehoods to propagate with no criticism, in the name of "freedom of speech", is not going to benefit anyone.

And even emotional relief has to have a limit: offering a word of encouragement to someone down and out is awesome; to join him in cursing some imaginary bogeyman ("sluts"; "Chads") is just silly. And to sympathize with or identify with spree killers (like the co-pilot who crashed a plane on purpose) -- sorry man, your forum is inviting ridicule.

Once again, someone mistaking my posts as a defense of the website - it wasn't. I'm merely responding to why I use the forum. Did I ever state that SH wasn't worthy of criticism?

Your post, to my reading, inherently assumes all SHers advocate said 'crackpot theories' by association. They don't. That's the same black-and-white thinking most SHers are guilty of. But even within some of those 'looks' theories are interesting/revealing real-world examples that are hard to otherwise pass off as 'rubbish'.

I agree however that freedom of speech is nothing without the freedom of others to challenge. Just don't assume that we all hold the central tenets of the PUA rules so dearly.

The salty virgins realized unfunny trolling won't get the thread removed so they're trying to be diplomatic now?

I'm not salty, I'm certainly no virgin and I am totally indifferent to this site's threads. Best you try again, eh?

 

[melty]

@Nara What was that,2 people? Okay,certain users attempted to "convince" kiwifarms,a forum that majority of people doesn't even know exists. What's the big deal about it¿?

No one knows sluthate exists either. People don't even know PUAhate, whenever I hear people talk about Elliot Rodger they think he was a Wizardchan regular or 4channer or whatever they think the bogeyman is.

 

[Dove]

@meltychocolate Good,and why should that be relevant?

 

[melty]

@meltychocolate Good,and why should that be relevant?

Sometimes I get the feeling you guys think your site is popular/well known. Maybe I'm wrong. Plus, you said it like kiwi farms being obscure is somehow bad.

 

[Pope Gregory IX]

The salty virgins realized unfunny trolling won't get the thread removed so they're trying to be diplomatic now?

I have already been named an Honorary Kiwi, praise be to Cop Dog. I was so proud I wanted to write it under my username, but I don't know how. Norwood has been here two days and already mastered this. I'm feeling less than.

I aim to blood up to Full Kiwi soon, but this is a marathon, not a sprint.

 

[Ruin]

I'm not salty, I'm certainly no virgin and I am totally indifferent to this site's threads. Best you try again, eh?

If you're not a virgin or bitter and angry what value could Sluthate possibly hold for you? I'm genuinely curious why you choose to spend your time on a website that idolizes mass murderers and the users all hate each other.

 

[Norwood Crematorium]

If you're not a virgin or bitter and angry what value could Sluthate possibly hold for you? I'm genuinely curious why you choose to spend your time on a website that idolizes mass murderers and the users all hate each other.

That's already been answered across the last page(s).

 

[Ruin]

That's already been answered across the last page(s).

Yea ok great. You can claim to be a clean cut all American type all you want, but that fact remains that well adjusted people don't hang out on a site that advocates mass murder and pedophilia. The fact that you are so insistent on defending Sluthate seems to indicate some sort of social maladjustment.

 

[Dr. Boe Jangles Esq.]

Yea ok great. You can claim to be a clean cut all American type all you want, but that fact remains that well adjusted people don't hang out on a site that advocates mass murder and pedophilia. The fact that you are so insistent on defending Sluthate seems to indicate some sort of social maladjustment.

My theory is that if we wait patiently, the other shoe will drop. He's not the first to try to pretend to be normal.

 

[Norwood Crematorium]

Yea ok great. You can claim to be a clean cut all American type all you want, but that fact remains that well adjusted people don't hang out on a site that advocates mass murder and pedophilia. The fact that you are so insistent on defending Sluthate seems to indicate some sort of social maladjustment.

I'm a clean-cut British type, I stated quite clearly in my third post that I wasn't normal and never once attempted to defend Sluthate. The site does not advocate murder and paedophilia; that's simply individual users allowed to speak freely who the majority of the site dislike. But don't worry about mere facts. No-one wants a war, Ruin - so the attitude isn't necessary.

For someone feigning superiority over a mere SlutHater, your reading comprehension sure needs to be brought up to scratch.

 

[supdup]

I agree however that freedom of speech is nothing without the freedom of others to challenge. Just don't assume that we all hold the central tenets of the PUA rules so dearly.

I get what you're saying. But there's something that sticks in the back of my mind, there has to be some common element between all the users to want join and participate in a forum called "Sluthate". If someone claims they're a member and participant of a forum called "Nazi's are cool", it's not necessarily unfair to think they're a Nazi. Because why would anyone who's not a Nazi join a Nazi forum? Same with Sluthate, if you're not a hater of sluts (and all that entails) then why join? There has to be other forums with interesting content that isn't based on the hate of sexual women.

 

[Frank Rizzo]

My theory is that if we wait patiently, the other shoe will drop. He's not the first to try to pretend to be normal.

This. Look at sephon. Look at scarface. Look at Thonis. Three examples of guys who came here originally going "I'M TOTES NORMAL, I'M JUST HERE TO HAVE AN INTELLIGENT DISCUSSION ABOUT SH."

And what wound up happening?

sephon chimped out because we weren't his hugbox and didn't agree blindly that he needed "maxilla surgery" that would magically change his life, he spammed dick pics and got banned.

scarface's many facades were seen through, and when we called him out on it, he threw a bitch fit and rage quit back to SH.

Thonis? Well, you can see for yourself what he morphed into.

 

[Dr. Boe Jangles Esq.]

No-one wants a war, Ruin

I have no idea what gave you that idea, my friend, but I think you're in for a rude awakening.

 

[Norwood Crematorium]

I get what you're saying. But there's something that sticks in the back of my mind, there has to be some common element between all the users to want join and participate in a forum called "Sluthate". If someone claims they're a member and participant of a forum called "Nazi's are cool", it's not necessarily unfair to think they're a Nazi. Because why would anyone who's not a Nazi join a Nazi forum? Same with Sluthate, if you're not a hater of sluts (and all that entails) then why join? There has to be other forums with interesting content that isn't based on the hate of sexual women.

Ah, now that is another bone of contention amongst the more normal-thinking. The name is appalling and I've lobbied hard for a name change - you could search the relevant posts if the site was up.

I used PUAhate before, and drifted to the new site once formed. The new name remains an embarassment.