SlutHate II: Hatred Edition - Now Known as "RedPillTalk"

Our modern standards were not their standards back then. Things may have sucked back then but generally we as a species and as a society try to make things less shitty than what they were before.

Could it have been the case? Possibly. The fact of the matter is that that isn't how we view the world today, so it is irrelevant.

For someone how considers himself logical, its hilarious to what him use the argument from tradition a-priori, and expect us all to just open wide and chug it down.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Pope Gregory IX
Our modern standards were not their standards back then. Things may have sucked back then but generally we as a species and as a society try to make things less shitty than what they were before.

Could it have been the case? Possibly. The fact of the matter is that that isn't how we view the world today, so it is irrelevant.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...2e7980-96d5-11e4-aabd-d0b93ff613d5_story.html

QED.

But we are talking about moral standards here. Our grandfathers were immoral for exploiting the teens.

What makes you think that modern moral standards are right on everything?

For someone how considers himself logical, its hilarious to what him use the argument from tradition a-priori, and expect us all to just open wide and chug it down.

Sexual attraction is not a tradition.
Even now when it's not a tradition a big chunk of men are attracted to teens.

But being attracted to a teen does not mean that you're going to exploit her. In which case your moral standards kick in.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sexual attraction is not a tradition.
Even now when it's not a tradition a big chunk of men are attracted to teens.

But being attracted to a teen does not mean that you're going to exploit her. In which case your moral standards kick in.
Yes. A chunk of men called "pedophiles".
This is dull. Got anything else?
 
Sexual attraction is not a tradition.
Even now when it's not a tradition a big chunk of men are attracted to teens.

But being attracted to a teen does not mean that you're going to exploit her. In which case your moral standards kick in.
Fuck you're an idiot. Arguing that previous generations did it assumes that previous generations were somehow right. Given the track record of history basing an ethical calculus on it is stupid as all fuck. You need better axioms kiddo.
 
@ThonisSH since you're ignoring my refuting your argument, I would like to take this time to remind to you that you're going to die all alone as an unloved virgin who's only notable fact was that he made a retard of himself on the internet.
 
It's funny because you guys probably think i would date an underage girl. I probably wouldn't date a girl who is below 19.

I am merely saying that being attracted to younger girls is not sick.

It is true that most teens are not mentally mature and so i would date a girl who is closer to my age. But that does not mean that i am not sexually attracted to girls who are 16-17.

I know a few underage girls. I even helped one of them pass the drug test that her mother gives to her after every friday night. Truth be told they are annoying but sometimes they come along with us and i speak to them briefly.
 
Yet to be sexually attracted to them is not wrong as a lot of them have the same body for a few more years. I am saying that if a 17 year old has the same body as 25 fit year old women is it truly sick?
In my personal opinion sexual attraction is something that cannot really be helped but it changes the second you act on it in any way.
Deciding you find young teens attractive? Ok. Going out of you way to ogle young teens and arguing that you should be allowed to fuck them? Not ok.
 
It's funny because you guys probably think i would date an underage girl. I probably wouldn't date a girl who is below 19.

I am merely saying that being attracted to younger girls is not sick.

It is true that most teens are not mentally mature and so i would date a girl who is closer to my age. But that does not mean that i am not sexually attracted to girls who are 16-17.

I know a few underage girls. I even helped one of them pass the drug test that her mother gives to her after every friday night. Truth be told they are annoying but sometimes they come along with us and i speak to them briefly.
You can't date any girls dude
 
Oh so would it be fine if the 11-year old had breasts then? What about even earlier? There are rare situations that cause people to go through puberty at exceptionally early ages.

No it wouldn't be fine. There is a gigantic change in mental growth during those ages.

In my personal opinion sexual attraction is something that cannot really be helped but it changes the second you act on it in any way.
Deciding you find young teens attractive? Ok. Going out of you way to ogle young teens and arguing that you should be allowed to fuck them? Not ok.

How old are you again?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No it wouldn't be fine. There is a gigantic change in mental growth during those ages.
What the fuck are you arguing again? Cogent statement of thesis plea... oh wait, forgot who I was talking to...
 
Yet to be sexually attracted to them is not wrong as a lot of them have the same body for a few more years. I am saying that if a 17 year old has the same body as 25 fit year old women is it truly sick?
Ah I'm glad you brought this up. I used to date a woman who looked to be in her late teens.. well into her 30s. A bouncer tried to take her ID away once in her late 20s. I liked her, other guys liked her a lot... lol lots of really old creepy guys too.

Anyhow for the most part she acted like an adult and I had things in common with her, you would certainly have a difficult time manipulating her. On the contrary she could be a downright controlling bitch when she was at her worst. Guys would comment how cute she was and so on, she did have a sort of youthful cuteness.
I don't see you guys doing that, I don't see you saying "man she'll hold up well" no even though by your own admission there are women of similar appearance that you could fawn over, you're still interested in the mentally undeveloped one who can be emotionally manipulated and plied with candy, cigarettes, alcohol, car rides and other shit that adults have and teenagers don't despite the fact it's totally frowned upon by society and acting on it at all will get you thrown in jail fast.


You're not so much into these girls for being hot, you just hide behind that shit because you know that most guys would never ever even hint that a teenager is attractive so you just call guys liars for not wanting to talk about it. It's creepy.. it's the sort of shit that would make me not let you come over to my house if I had kids or neighbors with kids. There is simply no reason in polite society for a man more than a year or two older to comment how attractive a schoolgirl is. You're into these kids because you're predatory. If there is some other reason that you can come up with that you'd fawn over illegal women vs fit women please share it with me. I of course did forget to account for the case that you may just be a straight up pedo who talks about JB because it's marginally more socially acceptable.

 
No it wouldn't be fine. There is a gigantic change in mental growth during those ages.

Your entire argument was that there was a difference between children and 'jailbait,' with jailbait being that they had started puberty and begun developing physically. But if you say it wouldn't be okay since there would be a difference in their mental growth, then why even bring up this distinction between children and 'jailbait' in the first place?

Edit:
I see. I did not expect your real age to be there. Are you single?
@Lalala has a new admirer. C-congratulations.,,
 
Back