Link | Archive
Link to the hit piece | Archive
On May 19th, 2025, the anti-white organization Hope Not Hate ‘‘doxxed’’ my real name and identity in a gutter trash article full of lies, cherry-picked and out-of-context quotations, and cheap smears. The hit-piece article followed what seemed to be an extensive campaign of spying and intelligence gathering more in keeping with East Germany or the Soviet Union than a supposed ‘‘Liberal Democracy’’. I was advised to take a step back for a while as the hit piece played out, which explains the lack of activity over the last week. However, there are a few points that I'd now like to highlight and address in response.
* After learning of an address I left years ago, Hope Not Hate proceeded to harass and question the current tenant of the property (whom I do not know) to illicit still more information about me, in particular my full name and personal details. The Hope Not Hate activists claimed to be mere journalists interested in interviewing a ''popular YouTuber''. Despite this, the current tenant found the behaviour so perverse and unsettling she called the police.
* Still unsatisfied, the Hope Not Hate activist Harry Shukman returned to the property the following day and pushed a letter through the door, offering the tenant a bribe in exchange for any letters or documents bearing my name. This would severely violate the Data Protection Act of 2018 and the Bribery Act of 2010. However, as is so often the case, this organization frequently appears to be above the law.
* Hope Not Hate activists then went door-to-door in the area where I once lived, interrogating residents about my whereabouts, identity, and activities. One former neighbour contacted me to say she was deeply concerned at the ‘‘odd’’ behaviour of the two activists posing as journalists (Harry Shukman and Patrik Hermansson), whom she found suspicious and dishonest.
* The photo of me Hope Not Hate posted in their smear article was taken from a private, invite-only conference that clearly stated that no pictures were to be taken without consent and that hidden cameras were disallowed. I did not consent to the photo Hope Not Hate took of me with a hidden camera after they entered the conference on false pretences.
* The article Hope Not Hate published on me is headlined with the outrageous slander that I ‘‘inspired a terrorist’’. By this, they're referring to the American mass murderer Dylan Roof. Not a shred of evidence is provided to support this claim, and there is no evidence that Dylan Roof had ever read my material or even heard of me. Moreover, Roof's influences are documented by himself and the American legal system, and my work is never mentioned or referred to. The phrase ‘‘If Jews Turned Blue’’ was common on message boards and forums in the early 2010s, which Roof was familiar with.
* The bulk of the Hope Not Hate hit piece relies on cherry-picked quotes and out-of-context statements made a decade ago on a blog that no longer exists. Many quotations attributed to me seem entirely made up. In the most popular article I've written on Substack, I state explicitly that people should stay away from the unrest resulting from the murder of three English girls at Southport. Naturally, the fact I've spent years telling people to be sensible and not get themselves in trouble or do violence runs against the picture Hope Not Hate wish to paint of me as a deranged ''Fascist'' stoking up racial tensions, so it is entirely ignored.
Hope Not Hate described me in the most hyperbolic and incendiary terms because they wish to fire up a flare that highlights me as a person to be un-personed. According to Google, I ‘‘inspired a terrorist’’ thanks to Hope Not Hate. It is obviously ludicrous, yet in their eyes, it’s a little white lie worth telling because it acts as a mechanism of psychological torment upon an individual they see as challenging the consensus. It points me out for the convenience of other institutions in a network of institutions that create and impose a consensus on the United Kingdom.
Yet, these little white lies the power structure’s institutions have told themselves over the years stack up, little by little, bit by bit, alongside the dead bodies and rapes. None of this concerns Hope Not Hate, naturally, who’ve turned slander and torment into a business model and career opportunity, but the larger society becomes ever more degraded and miserable.
Fundamentally, I’m just a middle-aged blogger who comments on culture and politics; I never pretended to be anything else. I’m not responsible for the United Kingdom becoming a surveillance state where shady NGOs masquerading as ‘‘charities’’ snoop and run intel ops on the population. It is not because of me that the exasperated American Government lectures the British Government on their apparent contempt for free speech and classic liberal mores or that our country is often regarded as a dystopian clown show.
Yet, the power structure itself, with Hope Not Hate acting as a goon squad, appears to think that the problems they’ve created will vanish if they just censor harder, slander more and pump up the number of people residing in jail for disagreeing with what power does and says. Why, if the foundations of this great society are so sound, does an organization such as Hope Not Hate need to exist? The assumption is that outliers from human nature are the system's critics and not that British society, as it is structured, is built on nothing but oppression, disregard for the majority's wishes and contempt for the human condition.
The fact is, the rot and decay at the heart of British society is not bloggers or YouTubers but the institutions of power itself.
I will no doubt have more to say on this in the future. For now, I want to thank everybody who has supported me, both privately during this recent affair and those who contributed financially to my work. I could not do this without you. Thank You.
Link to the hit piece | Archive
On May 19th, 2025, the anti-white organization Hope Not Hate ‘‘doxxed’’ my real name and identity in a gutter trash article full of lies, cherry-picked and out-of-context quotations, and cheap smears. The hit-piece article followed what seemed to be an extensive campaign of spying and intelligence gathering more in keeping with East Germany or the Soviet Union than a supposed ‘‘Liberal Democracy’’. I was advised to take a step back for a while as the hit piece played out, which explains the lack of activity over the last week. However, there are a few points that I'd now like to highlight and address in response.
* After learning of an address I left years ago, Hope Not Hate proceeded to harass and question the current tenant of the property (whom I do not know) to illicit still more information about me, in particular my full name and personal details. The Hope Not Hate activists claimed to be mere journalists interested in interviewing a ''popular YouTuber''. Despite this, the current tenant found the behaviour so perverse and unsettling she called the police.
* Still unsatisfied, the Hope Not Hate activist Harry Shukman returned to the property the following day and pushed a letter through the door, offering the tenant a bribe in exchange for any letters or documents bearing my name. This would severely violate the Data Protection Act of 2018 and the Bribery Act of 2010. However, as is so often the case, this organization frequently appears to be above the law.
* Hope Not Hate activists then went door-to-door in the area where I once lived, interrogating residents about my whereabouts, identity, and activities. One former neighbour contacted me to say she was deeply concerned at the ‘‘odd’’ behaviour of the two activists posing as journalists (Harry Shukman and Patrik Hermansson), whom she found suspicious and dishonest.
* The photo of me Hope Not Hate posted in their smear article was taken from a private, invite-only conference that clearly stated that no pictures were to be taken without consent and that hidden cameras were disallowed. I did not consent to the photo Hope Not Hate took of me with a hidden camera after they entered the conference on false pretences.
* The article Hope Not Hate published on me is headlined with the outrageous slander that I ‘‘inspired a terrorist’’. By this, they're referring to the American mass murderer Dylan Roof. Not a shred of evidence is provided to support this claim, and there is no evidence that Dylan Roof had ever read my material or even heard of me. Moreover, Roof's influences are documented by himself and the American legal system, and my work is never mentioned or referred to. The phrase ‘‘If Jews Turned Blue’’ was common on message boards and forums in the early 2010s, which Roof was familiar with.
* The bulk of the Hope Not Hate hit piece relies on cherry-picked quotes and out-of-context statements made a decade ago on a blog that no longer exists. Many quotations attributed to me seem entirely made up. In the most popular article I've written on Substack, I state explicitly that people should stay away from the unrest resulting from the murder of three English girls at Southport. Naturally, the fact I've spent years telling people to be sensible and not get themselves in trouble or do violence runs against the picture Hope Not Hate wish to paint of me as a deranged ''Fascist'' stoking up racial tensions, so it is entirely ignored.
Hope Not Hate described me in the most hyperbolic and incendiary terms because they wish to fire up a flare that highlights me as a person to be un-personed. According to Google, I ‘‘inspired a terrorist’’ thanks to Hope Not Hate. It is obviously ludicrous, yet in their eyes, it’s a little white lie worth telling because it acts as a mechanism of psychological torment upon an individual they see as challenging the consensus. It points me out for the convenience of other institutions in a network of institutions that create and impose a consensus on the United Kingdom.
Yet, these little white lies the power structure’s institutions have told themselves over the years stack up, little by little, bit by bit, alongside the dead bodies and rapes. None of this concerns Hope Not Hate, naturally, who’ve turned slander and torment into a business model and career opportunity, but the larger society becomes ever more degraded and miserable.
Fundamentally, I’m just a middle-aged blogger who comments on culture and politics; I never pretended to be anything else. I’m not responsible for the United Kingdom becoming a surveillance state where shady NGOs masquerading as ‘‘charities’’ snoop and run intel ops on the population. It is not because of me that the exasperated American Government lectures the British Government on their apparent contempt for free speech and classic liberal mores or that our country is often regarded as a dystopian clown show.
Yet, the power structure itself, with Hope Not Hate acting as a goon squad, appears to think that the problems they’ve created will vanish if they just censor harder, slander more and pump up the number of people residing in jail for disagreeing with what power does and says. Why, if the foundations of this great society are so sound, does an organization such as Hope Not Hate need to exist? The assumption is that outliers from human nature are the system's critics and not that British society, as it is structured, is built on nothing but oppression, disregard for the majority's wishes and contempt for the human condition.
The fact is, the rot and decay at the heart of British society is not bloggers or YouTubers but the institutions of power itself.
I will no doubt have more to say on this in the future. For now, I want to thank everybody who has supported me, both privately during this recent affair and those who contributed financially to my work. I could not do this without you. Thank You.
