If anything they're skirting the line between M and AO
The games they claimed went again guidelines recently were things like Neptunia, and those aren't particularly risque, just very basic fan service stuff, so they're pretty strict now. Neptunia was not even rated M, let alone approaching AO, just T. The woke mind virus is probably hitting Nintendo and the sight of no niggers or uggos is sending them into a frothing rage.
It wasn't clear if this was only NoA or not, hopefully that's the case.
Whatever hentia stuff they have on the Switch is either:
- the censored versions that have nudity but the good bits covered up or the H-scenes outright removed
- There is Nudity but it's only tits.
Only one game I've come across that has pussy shots and it was one of those tile moving/swapping """puzzle""" game where the art wasn't exactly top notch. Ironically the sequel game decided to censor those bits with white lines, so idk what made them defang themselves in the 2nd game.
I'm surprised there's any games even showing tits on a Nintendo system. And you're sure one showed pussy? I'd understand Nintendo taking action against that stuff. Hell, it'd be prudent to force games that contain "Hentai" in the title to change it, they appear to be shovelware anyway.
Woke = anti-White/hatred of the White race, so yes everything woke is trash. Why would you want to give money to people who hate the White race (if you are White). A game can have the best graphics, game mechanics, story, characters, ever seen in a video game, if it's woke I don't play it, I don't give money to the anti-White people who created it.
Primarily, but it's a bit more broad than that, woke is defined as something politically liberal or progressive, so jamming in positive portrayals of trannies or whatever also fits.
How about no niggers, how about that, instead let's have White hetero males. I'm annoyed with "anti-woke" guys who are fine with female niggers or warrior women (see picture) as long as they look good, totally missing the point. Isn't our world already feminized enough. The plane/helicopter accident, female pilot.
PS how about the moderators start banning woke people from the farms, if you don't gatekeep, every platform will become woke in the long run.
I think it just depends on the spirit of the game. There's always been niggers and women in fiction and didn't bother 99% of people. It's why the left's cry of racism and sexism falls flat. Final Fantasy 7 and Street Fighter 2 had niggers and female warriors, and they were cool. Nigger worship and girlbosses are what I don't want to see.
As for banning woketards, at the bare minimum do NOT let them become mods/admins. It's very dangerous because liberals are so fucking subversive and they hate free speech, which is fairly strong here.
The useful thing with superlative sentences, is that no further inquiry is required. It can be made, of course, but it's pointless.
The gas tank blew up and killed seven people. - How did they die? Were they burned by the blast? Were they shattered, then burned? Did the tank blow up and then land on the people?
We can detail and study all of the effects, it's just that for the purposes of informing facts, "the game is a piece of shit" does seem readily informative, whereas "uh it's woke" means now I have to sift through youtube grifters to see if it's woke because there's a black woman in it, or woke because the main character is too ugly, or woke because the devs are pozzed out retards on twitter, or woke because there are no sex options and only type A/type B duality in character creation, or woke because the story is a disastrous retelling of current year rightthink/wrongthink, etc.
Not really, because "uh it's woke" is equally readily informative of the facts as "uh it's shit". In your examples you're just taking the first statement that "it's shit" as word of God but then not doing so for the statement that "it's woke", instead now doing research to confirm if and exactly why it's woke, but not if and exactly why it's shit.
Now, if you'd also said this then it'd be an equal comparison:
"uh it's shit" means now I have to sift through youtube grifters to see if it's shit because there's a glitchy character in it, or shit because the main character is too boring, or shit because the devs are outed as lazy untalented hacks on twitter, or shit because there are no weapon options and only type warrior/mage duality in character creation, or shit because the story is a disastrous retelling of a classic tale, etc.
Fact is, there's no way to know exactly if/why something is really shit or woke based on just two words ("it's shit/woke"). That is because there's
some disagreement on what constitutes a game being woke, but I'd say much moreso about something being shit or not.
For example, if I say NES Zelda is shit we can have a dozen differing opinions that go on for pages, but if I say Concord is woke everyone except a deranged bad faith libtard will simply go "yep".
Tldr; "Woke" is just more informative than "shit", because woke specifically means there's liberal politics and sensibilities in the game (though whether there's enough of that in any given game to constitute it being woke
is subjective), so you know the general reason someone called a game woke. Shit is a lot more vague, there can be a thousand different reasons a game is shit, and it's inherently much more subjective.