Sony hate thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
plus I'm not sure Sly was ever that popular but I really don't know.
Sly never did that well. It was a moderate hit with the first, but decreased sales from there. I have no idea what Sony’s thought process was for green lighting a 4th at a time when R&C, the most popular of the PS2 trio, was struggling. The era was not suitable for the type of game Sly was, and the lack of marketing only made things worse.
 
Exactly, it runs contrary to reality, and people forget that there's used games, rentals, trades, borrowing, and piracy to consider.
Yup, so I decided to look up the number 1 best selling PS1 game of 1998 in the US. Gran Turismo.
In the United States, it was the best-selling PlayStation game of 1998 with 1,431,483 sales and $58,568,520 (equivalent to $105,155,485 in 2022) revenue.
1,4 million and that game was certainly popular and made lots of money.
 
Sly never did that well. It was a moderate hit with the first, but decreased sales from there. I have no idea what Sony’s thought process was for green lighting a 4th at a time when R&C, the most popular of the PS2 trio, was struggling. The era was not suitable for the type of game Sly was, and the lack of marketing only made things worse.
That's too bad, I only played Sly 4 but it was great, I'd have liked to see more.
 
That's too bad, I only played Sly 4 but it was great, I'd have liked to see more.
Sly 1 is your basic stealth adventure game where you go to different locations, beat the bosses of each stage, and then fight the final baddie

Sly 2 and 3 is where it gets more character/story focused, and the areas are more open-ish to where you can just dick around and explore. Tons of collectables and missions.

I started with 2 because one of my exs had the game and fucking fell in love with it, so I had to get the other ones. A complete gem of a game series i'd HIGHLY recommend.
 
Your franchises were never popular chuds:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=xee7FfFsgFk
This comment seems to explain the problem of the video perfectly.
Screenshot_1168.png
 
Batman Arkham
You know, as wonderful as the Arkham games were, and as much as I love them, I think they did contribute to Sony's overly cinematic focused style. That and Uncharted, which was even more the type of game Sony's stuck on now, but those games were liked because of the solid characters and story. Infamous was another one, I liked the first 2 games, and I think they were pretty popular.

Now we have this weird genre of games like Insomniac Spider-Man that try to copy those older games but without the quality of writing, and just copy the gameplay without considering if it actually matches the character they're working on. Spider-Man plays too much like Batman, for example.

Meanwhile all 3 of those series mentioned before are basically on ice now. Arkham ended, replaced by a horrifying Suicide Squad live service game; Uncharted had a 4th entry that was kind of mediocre, a spin-off with a de-sexualized Chloe, and has been basically dead ever since; and I don't know what's going on with Infamous at all anymore, it just had some bland entries with some other guy and then stopped. And now we get these really mediocre games that just want to be playable movies but they can't even get the story to not suck.

Sly 1 is your basic stealth adventure game where you go to different locations, beat the bosses of each stage, and then fight the final baddie

Sly 2 and 3 is where it gets more character/story focused, and the areas are more open-ish to where you can just dick around and explore. Tons of collectables and missions.

I started with 2 because one of my exs had the game and fucking fell in love with it, so I had to get the other ones. A complete gem of a game series i'd HIGHLY recommend.
I played a little bit of 2 or 3 at a friend's place back in the day. Disappointed I never got to play the full series. It seems like so many of Sony's classic series are basically dead now. Same goes for Jak & Daxter, which I remember playing a little bit of the first game.
 
It should also be noted that the definition of popularity have shifted since then. It sounds strange but a big-dev retail game didn't need to sell 20 million copies to be a hit or to be popular. Selling 10 million within a year was almost unheard of because the market wasn't as top heavy as it is now.
He also didn’t take in how Sony packs in many of their titles which has contributed significantly to the sales of Horizon, GOW and Spider-Man.

Earthbound is the greatest example of inordinate popularity in comparison to units sold.
To be fair, EarthBound and F-Zero have Smash, which has heavily skewed how popular they actually are. There are tons of “fans” but the only game they play is Smash while complaining that Captain Falcon needs to be brought back.

You know, as wonderful as the Arkham games were, and as much as I love them, I think they did contribute to Sony's overly cinematic focused style. That and Uncharted, which was even more the type of game Sony's stuck on now, but those games were liked because of the solid characters and story. Infamous was another one, I liked the first 2 games, and I think they were pretty popular.
Sony was more influenced by Uncharted and The Last of Us. The PS3 era struggled in selling IP and those two games were the only major successes of the console. Batman did impact Spider-Man though.

I don't know what's going on with Infamous at all anymore
The developer moved on to Ghost of Tsushima.
 
To be fair, EarthBound and F-Zero have Smash, which has heavily skewed how popular they actually are. There are tons of “fans” but the only game they play is Smash while complaining that Captain Falcon needs to be brought back.
I think you mean “made them heavily popular”. There are plenty of people, myself included, who found out about those games through Smash, played them, and became huge fans.
 
I think you mean “made them heavily popular”. There are plenty of people, myself included, who found out about those games through Smash, played them, and became huge fans.
Kinda. I don’t doubt that people played the games after, but I think a good chunk only like it because Smash. Smash has a lot of weirdness like that where people bandwagon characters they never heard of, or will play the game of, because of the echo chambers the community brings.
 
Last edited:
Kinda. I don’t doubt that people played the games after, but I think a good chunk only like it because Smash. Smash has a lot of weirdness like that where people bandwagon characters they never heard of, or will play the game of, because of the echo chambers the community brings.
F-Zero is a special case since Smash 64 is the first game that actually showed Captain Falcon besides a still image in F-Zero X’s ending. Combined with his cool moves and personality, he basically became the face for Smash and quickly became more associated with it than his own game.

But Earthbound? Ness didn’t stand out as being an especially cool character, but his inclusion made people wonder “what the heck is Earthbound?”, so they played it and saw that it was so much more than just Ness, while F-Zero is more like “cool Captain Falcon stuff plus other racers that aren’t Captain Falcon”. Not to undermine F-Zero, but I’d argue that Smash was more of a catalyst for people to give Earthbound a chance, while F-Zero gets more popularity from its main character’s direct association with Smash.
 
Sly 1 is your basic stealth adventure game where you go to different locations, beat the bosses of each stage, and then fight the final
Basic sounds good, I have this one installed on my Vita already, maybe I'll finally get around to it and run through the others if I like it.

To be fair, EarthBound and F-Zero have Smash, which has heavily skewed how popular they actually are. There are tons of “fans” but the only game they play is Smash while complaining that Captain Falcon needs to be brought back.
Maybe, but I think it's so easy to play Earthbound that most people have. Hell, there's even a demo in SSB... Brawl? Or was it Wii U?

"Keep in mind when I talk about toxic behavior..."
*exits tab*
He must have said toxic a million times.
 
Basic sounds good, I have this one installed on my Vita already, maybe I'll finally get around to it and run through the others if I like it.


Maybe, but I think it's so easy to play Earthbound that most people have. Hell, there's even a demo in SSB... Brawl? Or was it Wii U?


He must have said toxic a million times.
The demo for Earthbound was in Brawl for the Wii and it was only in the Japanese version, Earthbound at that time was still going through weird issues where Nintendo wasn’t sure they could re-release it in the West due to copyright stuff. Least that’s what I remember people saying, could’ve just been Nintendo didn’t think it was worth bothering with it. It wasn’t until 2013 on the Wii U for there to be a re-release, and it was the first time Europe got Earthbound in general since it never had a release on the snes there. Probably because it was a late SNES release and not like Nintendo was super popular in Europe during that period.
 
Earthbound at that time was still going through weird issues where Nintendo wasn’t sure they could re-release it in the West due to copyright stuff. Least that’s what I remember people saying, could’ve just been Nintendo didn’t think it was worth bothering with it.
Speculation always revolved around legal issues, but then it came to the Wii U and they didn’t change a single thing. Speaking of which, I kinda miss masterpieces (the Brawl/Smash 4 demos of Virtual Console games). They were completely unnecessary, but a fun way to take a break between matches. But I’ll stop here before the Sony thread devolves even further into another Nintendo thread.
 
Speculation always revolved around legal issues, but then it came to the Wii U and they didn’t change a single thing. Speaking of which, I kinda miss masterpieces (the Brawl/Smash 4 demos of Virtual Console games). They were completely unnecessary, but a fun way to take a break between matches. But I’ll stop here before the Sony thread devolves even further into another Nintendo thread.
At this point I don’t think I believe the “it was just legal issues” theory anymore. It’s most likely was just Nintendo of America not thinking it was worth the effort, which kinda seemed like a trend for NOA during that period.

Those demos have been the only time I’ve ever enjoyed speed running because it was neat to see people figure out how to beat demos that gave you like no time to actually make much progress in lol.

But yea back on topic can I ask has anyone actually seen a PS Portal in person? I was at a gamestop today and I saw a poster for one and had the realization that I’ve never actually seen the fucking thing once out in the wild.
 
F-Zero is a special case since Smash 64 is the first game that actually showed Captain Falcon besides a still image in F-Zero X’s ending. Combined with his cool moves and personality, he basically became the face for Smash and quickly became more associated with it than his own game.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, F-Zero needs to come back in some form. Nintendo said they don't want to bring it back because Mario Kart already fulfills the racing genre, but F-Zero has a really cool setting and characters behind it. I think a game based on Captain Falcon's bounty-hunting career set in the F-Zero universe would be a really fun direction for them to go in.
 
Basic sounds good, I have this one installed on my Vita already, maybe I'll finally get around to it and run through the others if I like it.
Its a decent game. No real replay value once you've finished it, but its a decent game and worth at least one playthrough.

Nintendo said they don't want to bring it back because Mario Kart already fulfills the racing genre, but F-Zero has a really cool setting and characters behind it.
The real reason Nintendo have done nothing with it is because Miyamoto couldn't really figure out any way to evolve the series. In other words, he couldn't figure out some new gimmick to attach to it. The thing is, F-Zero doesn't need to reinvent the wheel to be successful; the game was fun and great on its own.
 
Back
Top Bottom