Sony hate thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
if you're not too far on the soy side to blow girl boss shit and not too far on the incel side to hate women being in anything
I'm simply not a homosexual who likes masculine traits in women. But yes Kill Bill and first three Aliens films are the rare cases where it was done right. I also didn't mind much the fighter girl in FF 16, but if she would've worn a micro mini skirt and thigh highs it would've ruined the whole immersion, great outfit for night out and party, immersion ruining in pretty much every combat game.

Back in the days warrior women were rare, now every game, every film, every series has them, I mean we kinda live in a gynocracy, how can hetero male gamers not be annoyed by this is a mystery to me. No wonder everybody is gay these days and nobody has sex.

ZERO niggers and browns, more masculinity, and more feminity are reasonable demands for games and films at this point.

It is less dead and more in hospital.
Nope it's more alive than ever, don't get fooled by them maybe getting a bit more subtle about it. There are niggers everywhere, and they push female niggers hard, the most hideous creatures on the planet. Also kiwifarmers love to make excesses about it, BG3 was a great example for this, and they love to get soft on games that are just mildly woke, Pargmata has niggers in it, you see this more and more in Korean/Japanese games. Even Crimson Desert has niggers and browns. Sony is in full non-White worshipping mode, a Japanese company who should just have Japanese people in their games.
 
Last edited:
I'm simply not a homosexual who likes masculine traits in women.
You heard it here folks, liking sexy women is gay. I bet you also think that men without facial hair or cook and clean are effeminate too. MemriTV's account was discovered! Brother Ew!

But yes Kill Bill and first three Aliens films are the rare cases where it was done right.
Charlie's Angels, Xena, Samus Aran, Lara Croft, The female Power Rangers, a ton of anime and many, many more have depicted women being strong and sexy. It was recently (and only in the West) that the tendency to get strong women wrong surfaced. You know nothing.

I also didn't mind much the fighter girl in FF 16, but if she would've worn a micro mini skirt and thigh highs it would've ruined the whole immersion, great outfit for night out and party, immersion ruining in pretty much every combat game.
Yeah, let's keep the game with magic realistic. Who knows, maybe those micro mini skirts have protection spells woven into them and that makes them BETTER than armor. How does that work? MAGIC!

Back in the days warrior women were rare, now every game, every film, every series has them, I mean we kinda live in a gynocracy, how can hetero male gamers not be annoyed by this is a mystery to me.
Maybe men like women being competent and sexy. Trust me, if you can't understand the appeal of a scantly clad woman fighting, then the gay man might be the one in the mirror. Even back in the "good old days" we had literature featuring the "Jungle Princess" trope that showed scantly clad women fighting. Those were really popular too. Maybe your ideal world that you wish to return to never existed.

No wonder everybody is gay these days and nobody has sex.
Or people's money go to illegal migrants through taxes, prices increase, wages can't catch up and no one can afford a family anymore. How about that?
 
HHQD3W4X0AA8jAC.jpgHHPnlIlXgAAn01u.jpgHHVZg2-WsAAUBHm.png

:story:
 
Maybe men like women being competent and sexy. Trust me, if you can't understand the appeal of a scantly clad woman fighting
lol shut the fuck up, smarmy idiot.

Taki, of the Soul Caliber series (to seize a personal favorite example) isn't appealing because she's a woman fighting. She's appealing because she has huge fucking tits with their own gravitational pull, wears skin-tight spandex outfits that always accentuates her big fat puffy nipples (and sometimes even some camel toe too), and fights in a game series that implements jiggle physics, meaning every time she moves her fat floppy tits move more than anything else on the screen. No one gives a shit that she's larping as a stronk wamyn fighter who don't need no man. They're staring at her fat floppy tits (or ass if she's facing away from the camera; usually they put jiggle physics there too :story:).

"Le stronk fighting wamyns" is a feminist fantasy. Yes, there's a animalistic, almost sexual appeal in seeing a woman fighting an enemy in defense of her children, but 1) that's fantasy, and 2) astonishingly rare, as women are built to escape, hide, organize, regroup, and care for their young, not fight. A woman fights if she has literally no other options, or is mind-bogglingly retarded.

I'm sure some will roll their eyes at my introduction of culture war shit into a perfectly reasonable "lol fuck you Sony" discussion, but one of The Critical Drinker's single most effective and devastating criticisms against modern "akshun grrrrrl" cinema is how he describes every scene wherein the plucky, young(ish) sexy badass boss girl fights off all her evil, incompetent, big dumb enemies no matter how implausible it is. I paraphrase, of course, but it's always "she spends a few minutes fucking around with the gang of unreasonably accommodating stuntmen before she gets on to confront the Big Dumb Bald White Guy."

"Unreasonably accommodating stuntmen." Puts a hell of a blunt point on things, eh? There is a physical element the "tough female warrior" archetype can simply never actually overcome, and so usually just ignores. The stuntmen she's fighting are conspicuously incompetent and unexpectedly helpful. It's like they're losing on purpose, taking a dive to make her look cool, and inflicting brutal takedowns, flips and falls on themselves while making it seem like she's doing it since her muscles cannot force them to, because the script demands it.

Men are bigger than women. There's a fucking reason we keep men and women separate in combat sports -- if we didn't, women would routinely fucking die fighting men. Given no advantages -- just face-to-face, man-to-woman, no weapons, no guns, no nothing -- women cannot fight men with any expectation of "victory." The best a woman can generally hope for is briefly disabling a male foe (ball shot, sand to the eyes, etc.) for a chance to hide, arm herself, or escape. Something like the top 1% of exemplar female athletes possess the bare minimum strength to reach the bottom-tier capacity of an underrated, underperforming male athlete.

This isn't even theory or hypothetical. Look at troons trying to contaminate women's sports. That faggot Fallon Fox fought six MMA matches (and won five of them), brutally beating and injuring his female opponents, and the one time a woman beat him had literally everyone on their feet cheering for her because of 1) how rare it was to see a woman get one over on a big strong man, and 2) how much the fucking asshole richly deserved the beating. He shattered women's jaws in the ring, and tranny rights assholes cheered him on for it.

It's not a matter of being mean or anything. Women look fucking great in skin-tight spandex and I'd be delighted for that to become standard attire for any woman who isn't obese :story: but treating the notion of "women can fight men" as anything besides giggle-worthy fantasy is just retarded. At best it's just patronizing ("oh yes, you're a good girl, of course you could beat up Andre the Giant, [pats head], now go make dinner", and at worst it's dangerous letting women believe they have a fighting chance when they don't.
 
Taki, of the Soul Caliber series (to seize a personal favorite example) isn't appealing because she's a woman fighting. She's appealing because she has huge fucking tits with their own gravitational pull, wears skin-tight spandex outfits that always accentuates her big fat puffy nipples (and sometimes even some camel toe too), and fights in a game series that implements jiggle physics, meaning every time she moves her fat floppy tits move more than anything else on the screen. No one gives a shit that she's larping as a stronk wamyn fighter who don't need no man. They're staring at her fat floppy tits (or ass if she's facing away from the camera; usually they put jiggle physics there too :story:).
You really didn't actually understand anything I said. What I said was that fighting doesn't detract from the appeal of a woman. It is one thing if you don't feel greater attraction to women warriors but it rarely has been described as something that takes away from a woman's appeal. Ergo, we like sexy women fighting. Combat ability won't turn an uggo into a supermodel but can make an appealing woman more appealing.

"Le stronk fighting wamyns" is a feminist fantasy. Yes, there's a animalistic, almost sexual appeal in seeing a woman fighting an enemy in defense of her children, but 1) that's fantasy, and 2) astonishingly rare, as women are built to escape, hide, organize, regroup, and care for their young, not fight. A woman fights if she has literally no other options, or is mind-bogglingly retarded.
Yes, so? How is any of what you said disproving my point? "Women fight in defense of their children." Most men that fight do so too. Amazons, Boudica, Saint Joan, Shield Maidens, Mongols, anyone. They defend their homes, their kids and their ways of life. So do men. "They aren't as strong as men." Well, humans don't blast fireballs either. We aren't going for realism beyond a certain point. "They were rare in real life." So? People over 7 feet were rare too but you see them populate the rosters as well by being the heavy slow guys (in reality, those guys tended to be much faster too). Complete realism was never the point.

I'm sure some will roll their eyes at my introduction of culture war shit into a perfectly reasonable "lol fuck you Sony" discussion, but one of The Critical Drinker's single most effective and devastating criticisms against modern "akshun grrrrrl" cinema is how he describes every scene wherein the plucky, young(ish) sexy badass boss girl fights off all her evil, incompetent, big dumb enemies no matter how implausible it is. I paraphrase, of course, but it's always "she spends a few minutes fucking around with the gang of unreasonably accommodating stuntmen before she gets on to confront the Big Dumb Bald White Guy."

"Unreasonably accommodating stuntmen." Puts a hell of a blunt point on things, eh? There is a physical element the "tough female warrior" archetype can simply never actually overcome, and so usually just ignores. The stuntmen she's fighting are conspicuously incompetent and unexpectedly helpful. It's like they're losing on purpose, taking a dive to make her look cool, and inflicting brutal takedowns, flips and falls on themselves while making it seem like she's doing it since her muscles cannot force them to, because the script demands it.
OH MY GOD! No one likes those movies! Remember Black Widow in the MCU? Do you know why no one complained? Because she didn't fight men bigger than her fairly. She used gadgets, sneak attacks, cheap shots, allowed herself to be underestimated and got the upper hand. That is how a woman can fight in a grounded, realistic setting. The women the Drinker is talking about move like kittens and try to outmuscle men three times their size. That isn't how an experienced woman would fight. She would use every dirty trick in the book. Why do you think the Drinker had no problem with Black Widow? Ask that before you parrot him.

Men are bigger than women. There's a fucking reason we keep men and women separate in combat sports -- if we didn't, women would routinely fucking die fighting men. Given no advantages -- just face-to-face, man-to-woman, no weapons, no guns, no nothing -- women cannot fight men with any expectation of "victory." The best a woman can generally hope for is briefly disabling a male foe (ball shot, sand to the eyes, etc.) for a chance to hide, arm herself, or escape. Something like the top 1% of exemplar female athletes possess the bare minimum strength to reach the bottom-tier capacity of an underrated, underperforming male athlete.

This isn't even theory or hypothetical. Look at troons trying to contaminate women's sports. That faggot Fallon Fox fought six MMA matches (and won five of them), brutally beating and injuring his female opponents, and the one time a woman beat him had literally everyone on their feet cheering for her because of 1) how rare it was to see a woman get one over on a big strong man, and 2) how much the fucking asshole richly deserved the beating. He shattered women's jaws in the ring, and tranny rights assholes cheered him on for it.
Again: SPORTS ARE DIFFERENT THAN FIGHTING! In fighting you have weapons. Knives, swords, hammers, maces, toxins, guns. Doesn't matter if you can take a punch or a kick by a woman. You cannot take a stab or a gunshot. War has no rules.

It's not a matter of being mean or anything. Women look fucking great in skin-tight spandex and I'd be delighted for that to become standard attire for any woman who isn't obese :story: but treating the notion of "women can fight men" as anything besides giggle-worthy fantasy is just retarded. At best it's just patronizing ("oh yes, you're a good girl, of course you could beat up Andre the Giant, [pats head], now go make dinner", and at worst it's dangerous letting women believe they have a fighting chance when they don't.
Again, this isn't about realism. Yes, women are weaker. Yes, some men cannot be overcome in a fair fight. 2 things though:

1) Games don't have to be realistic, especially ones with clear exaggerations. Magic, violations of the laws of physics etc etc. No game wants to be fully realistic unless you want a fight to end in one strike because you hit the guy in the spot in which he had surgery. That isn't fun. No one wants a character in a fighting game that can't move because he has only one HP. We still want that comeback.

2) Weapons are force multipliers. What goes on the UFC, doesn't matter in a real combat situation where weapons are allowed. And that isn't just me saying it. Others have too. Metatron on YT has talked about it and he is about as far from woke as it gets. Women that have fought men in a historic setting and won always used weapons. Would you be better off arming a man? Yes but sometimes you have more weapons than men.
 
1) Games don't have to be realistic
Correct. This is the only way they can excuse the fantasy of having powerful female characters who can hold their own against male characters.

Maybe men like women being competent and sexy. Trust me, if you can't understand the appeal of a scantly clad woman fighting
I'm explaining to you that the fantasy doesn't really exist (few people, if any, actually prefer it). A competent and sexy woman isn't a fighter. She's competent at doing something else, not fighting. I'm explaining to you that the appeal of a scantily-clad woman fighter is that she's scantily-clad, not that she's fighting.

No fighting game was ever made worse by taking the women out (beyond the damage of taking out a familiar character regardless of sex). You know what did make a lot of modern fighting games worse, to the point that people actually bitched loudly enough for the devs to notice (and for the idiot devs to mock them and double-down in response)? Covering them up. I forget which Mortal Kombat installment it was that decided it was going to have half-naked burly boys fighting (as to be expected, natch) but go full muzzie tarp mode covering up all the women, and boy howdy did people fucking hate that shit. Ed Boon stepped on so many rakes defending that choice, holy fucking shit.
 
Correct. This is the only way they can excuse the fantasy of having powerful female characters who can hold their own against male characters.
As I said before, weapons as well do that too. A game with fully realistic weapons is rarely fun however. Women are better at making new soldiers so that is the reason they were kept from combat. Not being as strong was merely part of it. Without women, a country dies. In many cases however they were still taught combat as you never knew if you would be attacked with only a few men.

I'm explaining to you that the fantasy doesn't really exist (few people, if any, actually prefer it). A competent and sexy woman isn't a fighter. She's competent at doing something else, not fighting. I'm explaining to you that the appeal of a scantily-clad woman fighter is that she's scantily-clad, not that she's fighting.
People like competence. We are hardwired to find people that are good at something useful appealing. Look at media depicting women that suck at fighting and watch how every fan complains about it while glazing the women that can fight. There is sex appeal to it. Beautiful, athletic bodies and competence are an appealing combination. Don't like it? Many others do.

No fighting game was ever made worse by taking the women out (beyond the damage of taking out a familiar character regardless of sex). You know what did make a lot of modern fighting games worse, to the point that people actually bitched loudly enough for the devs to notice (and for the idiot devs to mock them and double-down in response)? Covering them up. I forget which Mortal Kombat installment it was that decided it was going to have half-naked burly boys fighting (as to be expected, natch) but go full muzzie tarp mode covering up all the women, and boy howdy did people fucking hate that shit. Ed Boon stepped on so many rakes defending that choice, holy fucking shit.
No fighting game was hurt because no one was dumb enough to do it. Having women in the roster means more character designs. Gameplay and visuals. That is how that works. You can almost double the roster. As for covering them up, no one likes censorship or lack of sex appeal.
 
Le gay brown Jeet man, black lesbians, degenerate interracial infidelity.

No wonder games journos are soyjacking like crazy over Saaros.

Is a wave of Indian-character games (see also Unknown 9: Awakening) actually a trend, or are these just one-off games, because gamers aren't fond of Pajeet characters either? I'm leaning more towards the latter, since WWE tried to do the same with Jinder Mahal winning the WWE Championship, but even Indians weren't fond of that either.
 
Back
Top Bottom