Science SPACEX "Starship" explodes shortly after launch

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

SPACEX​

"Starship" explodes shortly after launch​

The unmanned "Starship" giant rocket of the US space company SpaceX has exploded during its first test flight. The largest and most powerful rocket ever built took off on Thursday from the SpaceX spaceport Starbase in Boca Chica in the US state of Texas. However, just over three minutes after launch, the rocket detonated, live footage showed.​
Online since today, 3:41 p.m. (Update: 3:57 p.m.)

At that point, the first booster stage called "Super Heavy" should have separated from the "Starship" space shuttle. SpaceX spoke on Twitter of a "rapid unplanned breakup prior to stage separation." "Teams will continue to evaluate data and work toward our next flight test," tech billionaire Elon Musk's company added. The launch was delayed by a few minutes: the countdown had been briefly interrupted to check some more details. Afterwards, the launch was released after all. Actually, the "Starship" of the private space company SpaceX of tech billionaire Elon Musk should have already taken off on Monday for a first short test flight. But that was postponed shortly before the planned launch because of a problem with a valve.

Enormous setback
The "Starship" rocket system - consisting of the roughly 70-meter-long "Super Heavy" booster and the roughly 50-meter-long upper stage, also called "Starship" - is intended to enable manned missions to the moon and Mars in the future. The "Starship" system is in itself designed so that the spacecraft and rocket can be reused after returning to Earth. The explosion, however, is an enormous setback for the initiative. The U.S. space agency NASA has selected "Starship" to fly humans to the moon for the first time in more than 50 years in the Artemis 3 mission at the end of 2025. Even flights to Mars should be possible with the rocket.

First attempt briefly halted
The launch of the 120-meter-high rocket from SpaceX's Starbase spaceport in Boca Chica was stopped on Monday less than ten minutes before the planned ignition. As a kind of dress rehearsal, however, the countdown continued until ten seconds before the originally planned launch time. The reason given for the abort was a technical problem with the pressure equalization on the most powerful space rocket ever built. Musk wrote on Twitter, apparently a valve had frozen. However, he said SpaceX had "learned a lot" from the launch attempt. It was only in February that almost all of the rocket's first stage engines had successfully ignited for the first time during a test in Boca Chica. Musk then declared that the 31 engines ignited in the test were "enough to reach orbit".

Explosion after first landing
Apart from the size and the associated possibility of transporting large loads, the reusability of all rocket components pursued by SpaceX is another central element of the "Starship" program. The declared goal is to significantly reduce the cost of operating spacecraft. SpaceX reported the first successful landing of a prototype in May 2021. Shortly thereafter, the explosion of the rocket made headlines. It was the third explosion within a few months - yet Musk remained convinced that the "Starship" rocket would soon be "safe enough" to transport people.

Youtube Video

Private moon orbit with billionaire and artists
Since last year, SpaceX has been trying to launch its spacecraft into orbit for the first time. At the beginning of the year, Musk had initially set a launch date of February or March - but at the same time made this dependent on the further course of testing. The schedule will be missed by at least a few weeks. A first private space mission is also planned for this year. The Japanese billionaire Yusaku Maezawa recently announced his intention to circumnavigate the moon in a "starship" together with eight artists. The moon will then also be the destination of a mission pursued jointly with NASA.

Central role for NASA moon program

NASA is currently planning to use "Starship" as a landing module in its Artemis program in 2025 at the earliest. The rocket is significantly larger and more powerful than NASA's SLS rocket, which the space agency plans to use to put astronauts into orbit around the moon from 2024.​
1681999822370.png
After several weeks in space, the unmanned "Orion" capsule of NASA's Artemis 1 lunar mission returned to Earth in December

According to NASA plans, the "Starship" mission is dependent on the progress of the Artemis-2 mission. After the Artemis-1 mission, which ended in December with the return of an unmanned Orion space capsule to Earth, a manned orbit of the moon is now on the agenda. The next step will be to bring astronauts to the moon again with the "Starship". NASA put the last humans on the moon in 1972 with the Apollo 17 mission. The USA was the only country to put twelve astronauts on the moon with the Apollo missions between 1969 and 1972.

Space suits ready
Artemis 3 will be much more complex, according to NASA, combining the SLS "Orion" system with spacecraft built and flown by SpaceX. The NASA plan calls for a four-person "Orion" crew to dock in space with a SpaceX lander that will carry two astronauts to the lunar surface for nearly a week.

Twitter | Archive

According to NASA, an orbital fuel depot and a space tanker are required in addition to the Starship. The new space suits developed for the mission in collaboration with Axiom Space were unveiled by NASA in mid-March. In the "Starship" program, the moon is only the first stopover on the first manned mission to Mars, which Musk has already announced for 2029.
red, ORF.at/Agencies

Source (German)
 
And now it blows up not once but TWICE. The booster exploded after separation and then later the second stage blew up.

This is a disaster; don’t buy the hype it’s “we learn from every failure”.

A d-i-s-a-s-t-e-r.
I’ll have to update this post; I’ve lost track of how many have blown up since then. Elon dicksuckers feel free to weigh in how good the program is going.

Get real. Elon will be lucky to send a rocket to mars by 2026 (which ain’t hard), perhaps successfully LAND on mars with a rocket by 2035; and perhaps by 2040 get a rocket to take off from the surface. Perhaps a manned flight to the surface by 2045-2050.

And that’s if stars align for him; I.e. if they stop blowing up. You Elon fanboys need your head examined.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hitman One
I’ll have to update this post; I’ve lost track of how many have blown up since then. Elon dicksuckers feel free to weigh in how good the program is going.

Get real. Elon will be lucky to send a rocket to mars by 2026 (which ain’t hard), perhaps successfully LAND on mars with a rocket by 2035; and perhaps by 2040 get a rocket to take off from the surface. Perhaps a manned flight to the surface by 2045-2050.

And that’s if stars align for him; I.e. if they stop blowing up. You Elon fanboys need your head examined.
I'm just upset this is literally the thing that's supposed to get us to the Moon.....

I think Blue origin is working on a backup vehicle but still.
 
I'm just upset this is literally the thing that's supposed to get us to the Moon.....

I think Blue origin is working on a backup vehicle but still.
It’s a worry. Even after they eventually get it working; they will have to do a number of flights without incident to the moon before NASA lets them treat their astronauts as flare balls.

Musk has sacrificed good design for weight; much like the Titan and shitty cars made today that can’t tow shit beyond their payloads when they hit sudden moments of stress. I suspect the engines create too much thrust for the design to handle and it’s akin to having a truck engine on Volkswagen chassis.

The fist step will be for musk to abandon the reusable stage and recognize that a more robust rocket is better and let go of the high translunar loads and send two good rockets instead of one.

They got to go back and rethink it, eat shit and redesign.
 
Some Elon supporters think NASA hasn’t got the ability to build rockets to the moon or to go to Mars.

Both are incorrect. NASA merely told congress what it would actually cost and they scoffed at the price tag and people like Elon promised them a figure they could live with.
 
Back