You mean Justice League Infinity? I gave that a chance because a couple people involved with the show worked on it, and it completely sucked. It weirdly rehashes things that already happened on the show while also contradicting it and retconning it (probably by accident). I get the feeling Tucker and DeMatteis haven't thought much about JLU in the past 20 years and have mostly forgotten it. And if you take out the mangled DCAU callbacks then it's just another generic multiverse story with another generic Evil Nazi Superman, quite literally the single most boring overly-done thing they could possibly have shat out, and something the DCAU has already done better multiple times.
I don't trust any new "DCAU" material. The animated Fatal Five movie wasn't great and that had Bruce Timm on board. And Timm has straight up said it's a "possible future" or "could be canon" or whatever. He knows what it is, he knows it's not on part with the old stuff. DC otoh doesn't have any qualms about quality control, every time they try to draw some more blood from the DCAU's corpse they will promise it's DEFINITELY TRUE CANON. I haven't read the "official" Batman Beyond comics but the plot summaries sound utterly shit and at odds with the show.
Timm inserted the babs/bruce into Killing Joke, so no. Don't trust Timm.
They did do a series of DC Beyond expanded before Nu52 that I remember liking well enough with Beechen and I want to say Dustin Nugyen. But for me that plus the adventures tie ins were enough.
I agree with
@MirrorNoir @Mississippi Motorboater
There's a difference between not liking art and not crediting a good artist. I loathe the anus scratches of Bill Sienkbitch or what ever, but I can't deny the artistry behind say New Mutants or Elektra. Frank Quitely is an amazing drafter with a keen sense of sequential art as a medium. There are tons of standout moments in the series, whether the scene with the admittedly eye rolling two dimensional Cassandra Nova using her powers to drive Beast to attack the bird mutant or #121, where Jean and Emma delve through the unconscious Xavier's mind.
To be sure, the state of the X-men plays a role in justifying it. Because yes, the Claremont X-men were well and truly dead. The 90s had made them unreadable. I note you mention Magneto and making him a villain. Well, how can a man using nukes to threaten world annihilation who ripped the adamantium from Wolvie's skeletons be anything but?
There are two interpretations. Either the way Magneto views himself (via Claremont) as a misguided but good man is accurate or he's delusional. At some point, you cross the event horizon though. Since his 'redemption' he did all those things. That was the state of the X franchise. And I'm just giving one example of how wholly malformed it was.
I don't know if Grant disregarded all characterizations...or any. I'd be happy to discuss the bat saga, because....
...You know, I hadn't read A Serious House On Serious Earth, and I had it on my reading list because the art looked intriguing...but now I'm having second thoughts.
It's....something different. I view it as a dream. There are moments that work and look good. here's the thing. If you want to read Morrison, be prepared for him to approach based on the point he's at as a creator...and he's not the typical edgy britbong faggot, making it tougher to deal with
Morrison circa 80s was a Moore larper, he was pretentious and treated superheroes not with outright contempt but some level of disdain. Deconstruction. Then around 90 as he's getting done with Animal Man and doing Doom Patrol deconstructing heroes, he starts to change a little.
He was starting to grow and change, I think effected by his friendship with Millar in..94ish