It's not fucking rare, it was printed by Image in the fucking 90s.
I'm pissed that Alan Moore was a cunt to his collaborators and prevented a trade that would have made them some much needed cash...
@Alexander Thaut
All the confusion made me go back, so here are the details of '63.
63 started conception in '92-'93, ending a period of extreme irrelevance for Moore following his 88-89 divorce from the mainstream. Jim Valentino reached out to Moore and his top 80s collaborators leading to parody/retro series '63.
'63 exists in two forms, like Watchmen. The pages stories, thin reinterps of the 60s with even period authentic ink, coloring, and paper. It was very thought out and deliberate. They did six issues; with Gibbons, Don Simpson, Rick Veitch, John Toltebeen, and Bissette. The series was to culimnate in a massive annual drawn by Jim Lee. The second was the behind the scene character assassinations of the Marvel 60s creatives.
Each issue had letters colums by Moore in his 'affable al' persona, a hit at Stan Lee.
Affable Al interviews are a series of interviews he did at the end there.
Ultimately, it seems as if the Image guys never cared about the artists on '63, but the big name writer, Moore. That seems reflected in Bissettes interview, that led to him getting the ax from Moore's friends list.
Moore was highly sought after for clout, as all the Image comics were panned for being poorly written garbage. Moore wound up doing a ton of work for McFarlane, Liefeld, Lee. he did some smaller pieces for Valentino. But what's criminal is the list of collaborators on the project who are literally left holding the bag for a big project. They spent time putting this together and now their ability to monetize their hard work is literally scrubbed.