- Joined
- Oct 20, 2019
So I've spent about twenty minutes with ComfyUI and I don't think I'm ever going back to Automatic1111. I don't know why the performance difference is so striking as I thought the difference was primarily UI. I was motivated to try this new "ComfyUI" I saw a reference to because trying out SDXL with 1024x1024 the speed of generating them compared to previous models at 512x512 absolutely tanked. From maybe 30s to 7min+. Switching to ComfyUI has restored things to fast turn-around. This is on an AMD RDNA3 card, btw. As AMD continue to increase support for that I hope it to improve further.
Some people have said ComfyUI's downside is greater complexity. I don't find it so at all. In fact I find it simpler than Automatic1111.
Also, I think it will be easier to script large batches of images to run when I try running it on some paid GPU instance in the Cloud. Which I intend to do as soon as I (a) have time and (b) and certain I wont accidentally run it for a month and rack up a couple of thousand pounds bill.
Some people have said ComfyUI's downside is greater complexity. I don't find it so at all. In fact I find it simpler than Automatic1111.
Also, I think it will be easier to script large batches of images to run when I try running it on some paid GPU instance in the Cloud. Which I intend to do as soon as I (a) have time and (b) and certain I wont accidentally run it for a month and rack up a couple of thousand pounds bill.