Stable Diffusion, NovelAI, Machine Learning Art - AI art generation discussion and image dump

[AnOminous]

What does that mean legally? These are things that are gonna be decided in courts in the next years and I wonder what the impact will be. (Also very apropos to the early computer and internet times where "the law" basically didn't understand that stuff and you could get away with *a lot*)

Depending on the content it could run afoul of plain old federal obscenity law even if it doesn't fall into the "child pornography" category technically. And of course in other countries it could just be flat out illegal. I believe Canada is such a country. To some extent it might be a tough call for the federal courts especially if at least some of the dataset really is actual children. Although I don't think that argument will be availing in the copyright context, it could potentially work in the obscenity context or in regard to a well-drafted pornography-related law.

 

[The Mass Shooter Ron Soye]

Stable Diffusion Benchmarked: Which GPU Runs AI Fastest (Updated)

Which graphics card offers the fastest AI?

www.tomshardware.com

Stable Diffusion Benchmarked: Which GPU Runs AI Fastest | Tom's Hardw…

archived 23 Jan 2023 11:30:42 UTC

archive.ph

 

[Balr0g]

Wanted something optimistic for once. Turned out quiet good and only a few prompts (and no negative prompt)

 

[A Hot Potato]

Decided to start dicking around with MidJourney.

Nether of these are quiet perfect, but I still like em.



Edit: This too holy fuck.


Edit Edit: I doxed myself with the orginal file names lol, reuploaded them for safety

 

[WelfareNiggerQueen]

Stable Diffusion Benchmarked: Which GPU Runs AI Fastest (Updated)

Which graphics card offers the fastest AI?

www.tomshardware.com

Stable Diffusion Benchmarked: Which GPU Runs AI Fastest | Tom's Hardw…

archived 23 Jan 2023 11:30:42 UTC

archive.ph

View attachment 4319165
View attachment 4319168
View attachment 4319171

>Terashits per megashart
Anyway's here are some more long eared niggers frens

Spoiler: FF 15 Cid but long eared nigger

Spoiler: More outdoors long eared niggers

 

[Starved Artist]

Depending on the content it could run afoul of plain old federal obscenity law even if it doesn't fall into the "child pornography" category technically. And of course in other countries it could just be flat out illegal. I believe Canada is such a country. To some extent it might be a tough call for the federal courts especially if at least some of the dataset really is actual children. Although I don't think that argument will be availing in the copyright context, it could potentially work in the obscenity context or in regard to a well-drafted pornography-related law.

But that's the fun part. Unless you're actually telling people what you're generating, nobody will ever know. A wise shitposter once said on the Stable Diffusion threads, you can't put the toothpaste back in the tube. I've got a million Nazi Kanyes ready to march upon Poland and nobody can stop me.

A smart freak/absolute degenerate will generate all the vile shit they want and rip their dick off/grind their clit off in the comfort of their own home.

Yet, the existence of the Farms proves that there are people who will do the most vile and disgusting things and CANNOT HELP but tell other people about it. When they do? Just treat them like any regular old criminal. There's no need to thought police and worry about what people MIGHT do, just regular police and punish the freaks for oversharing. At the end of the day, you can always trust the narcissists to tell on themselves.

 

[Abeezo]

I have been obsessed with this 90's and 2000's jap artstyle thing I've been fucking around with lately. I love it!

 

[Pocket Dragoon]

 

[Pendulous Dong]

made some flowers

 

[Hair and Nails]

View attachment 4329263

That made me feel some unfamiliar emotion

 

[Pocket Dragoon]

That made me feel some unfamiliar emotion

"Bob Ross wasn't just painting the same things; he was painting a journey."

Ngl made my eyes leak a little.

The one from this series kinda did too:


I forgot that I could even remember those times....

 

[bifftango]

That made me feel some unfamiliar emotion

That's the priapism; you should really see a doctor.

 

[AmpleApricots]

Instead of going an art route I've been trying to go the route of generating images that look realistic, in the way of "somebody might've taken that with their shitty android phone" kind of way. Results have been going from hilarious to uncanny but there's still the little mistakes in the picture that tells you that something doesn't look right. Interesting and kinda wild at any rate.


I've also tried my hand at more classical art generations, like impressionist paintings and portraits that might've been made in the 18th and 19th century. The problem with those is usually that the AI gets the background right but the person in 9 out of 10 times looks way too photo-realistic, sharp and out of place. I guess I'm going to have to experiment a bit with things like dreambooth.

 

[A Hot Potato]

Not particularly fond of Snoopy, but I decided to try some things with him anyway.

First one started with me trying to make a photo of Snoopy like one of the ones in the opening of Cheers, but I gave up and made something slightly different.



Next one was me trying to have Snoopy fight Goku DBZ style.

Needless to say, I'm not sure what happened.

 

[The Mass Shooter Ron Soye]

Stable Diffusion Benchmarked: Which GPU Runs AI Fastest (Updated)

Which graphics card offers the fastest AI?

www.tomshardware.com

Stable Diffusion Benchmarked: Which GPU Runs AI Fastest | Tom's Hardw…

archived 23 Jan 2023 11:30:42 UTC

archive.ph

View attachment 4319165
View attachment 4319168
View attachment 4319171

Tom's fucked up their shit and changed it. Here are their new charts, properly putting Nvidia's latest at the top. But with at least one mistake on them, iterations/sec on one where it should say FP16 TFLOPS.

Stable Diffusion Benchmarked: Which GPU Runs AI Fastest (Updated) | T…

archived 25 Jan 2023 19:45:35 UTC

archive.ph

Spoiler

 

[*sigh*]

 

[A Hot Potato]

Don't know anymore.

 

[macrodegenerate]

I was out a bit of the whole thing for a bit and started getting into the newest stuff again since a few days here and there and the development jump from just a few months ago is kinda crazy tbh. Feels kind of like computers some 30 years ago where there was no telling what things would be available in two years.

Also coomers man, I think they drive most of this. I've seen convincing nudes on civitai and reddit where if shown in a blind test, I would not be able to tell you if these are real photos (albeit photoshopped to airbrush etc.) or AI generated. This was not a thing a few months ago, nor was it possible. It's a completely unregulated frontier but somehow I start to think it won't stay that way for long. I'm convinced we're at a point where you could for example generate photo-realistic child porn that'd stand up to some scrutiny. (Frankly, I'd be surprised if people don't already make such) Yet it is generated. What does that mean legally? These are things that are gonna be decided in courts in the next years and I wonder what the impact will be. (Also very apropos to the early computer and internet times where "the law" basically didn't understand that stuff and you could get away with *a lot*)

It's a pretty bad idea to produce or possess something that is indistinguishable from real CSAM. If the police or federal law enforcement find it and use it to charge a person, all the cops need to do is show a jury it as evidence, and the philosophical underpinning of AI generation goes out the window. People are extremely trigger happy on that stuff for good reason, and no excuses are acceptable.

 

[AnOminous]

It's a pretty bad idea to produce or possess something that is indistinguishable from real SAM. If the police or federal law enforcement find it and use it to charge a person, all the cops need to do is show a jury it as evidence, and the philosophical underpinning of AI generation goes out the window.

That's why you don't want shit like that in front of a jury. And why even a judge might be so disgusted by it as to get the law wrong. However, something that is literally indistinguishable from CP is likely to be unprotected by the First Amendment if it has no artistic merit (however arbitrary that phrase is) and exists solely to excite prurient interest.

To be illegal it would just have to be targeted with a well-drafted law.

 

[macrodegenerate]

That's why you don't want shit like that in front of a jury. And why even a judge might be so disgusted by it as to get the law wrong. However, something that is literally indistinguishable from CP is likely to be unprotected by the First Amendment if it has no artistic merit (however arbitrary that phrase is) and exists solely to excite prurient interest.

To be illegal it would just have to be targeted with a well-drafted law.

My assertion is that it doesn't matter if the murder weapon sitting on your desk is a copy. The evidence is fake, but if nobody can tell or denying it makes someone's job harder, it implicates you.