Star Trek - Space: The Final Frontier

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Clown College said:
Ok don't ruin the prime timeline for me ok, just don't. In my mind STD is in the Abramsverse with all the other garbage Trek series.
Click to expand...
craiyon_035420_mike_stoklasa_in_silent_hill_4_71.png

ToroidalBoat said:
Live action Kzinti may not have worked out so well in TNG, as "fursuits" show.
Click to expand...
2fe.jpg


And what species was M'ress from the animated series? She wasn't Kzinti. Are there other feline species?
Flexo said:
Or worse - it would have inspired an even larger generation of furries.
Click to expand...
I think it would be cool if Trek followed the first interacial kiss on television with beastiality.
20220903_034149.png
 
I imagine one could simulate "politically incorrect" stuff in the holodeck when off duty in the Enterprise D, as TNG was made in the 1980s IRL. But if the Discovery of STD has a holodeck, one could get in big trouble simulating "politically incorrect" stuff there.
 
ToroidalBoat said:
(Star Trek: The Animated Series | Memory Alpha | Fandom)

If TAS is "canon", it doesn't really fit the rest of the pre-JJ series after TAS that well. There's no more Kzinti and no more "life support belts" for example. But it still fits the ST universe far better than STD does, that's for sure.
Click to expand...
Ex Astris Scientia has a good article on the canonicity of TAS. Basically, a few episodes like "Yesteryear" fit into Star Trek canon without issue. As you noted, TAS feels more Trek-like than nuTrek (even though stuff like LDS is probably more canonically accurate).
 
Thomas Bayard said:
Ex Astris Scientia has a good article on the canonicity of TAS. Basically, a few episodes like "Yesteryear" fit into Star Trek canon without issue. As you noted, TAS feels more Trek-like than nuTrek (even though stuff like LDS is probably more canonically accurate).
Click to expand...
yeah TAS certainly has its flaws but it's a lot more "more TOS" than basically anything else
 
What if warp drive really works, and all it takes is sending plasma through coils with some kind of superconductor material in them?

:thinking:

(IIRC that's how that old '90s "technical manual" of the Enterprise D explained it.)
 
ToroidalBoat said:
What if warp drive really works, and all it takes is sending plasma through coils with some kind of superconductor material in them?

:thinking:

(IIRC that's how that old '90s "technical manual" of the Enterprise D explained it.)
Click to expand...
I got a technical manual around. Want me to double check?
Or would that be too nerdy?
 
It looks like Paramount/CBS kind of forgot to put Shatner's Kirk on the key art of their Star Trek Day™.

pp_15562_star_trek_universe_brand_startrekday_1460x821.png
 
Miller said:
It looks like Paramount/CBS kind of forgot to put Shatner's Kirk on the key art of their Star Trek Day™.

View attachment 3687507
Click to expand...
They forgot to put either kirk. Why Spock AND Uhurah? I would have actually tolerated them doing 1 original cast member and 1 kelvin time cast member if they've got to share the stage with the rest there.
 
The Wrath of Khan 40th anny screening was a blast.

Nice to be able to blow free pass on non capeshit for once.
 
ToroidalBoat said:
What if warp drive really works, and all it takes is sending plasma through coils with some kind of superconductor material in them?
Click to expand...
Oh if we do ever figure it out it'll definitely be something offensively simple like that. You just spin a big magnet at a certain angle next to a big cube of copper or something.

Like the helical drive proposal involves ions and a rowboat or something? idk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom