- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
starting clockwise from the leftmost negress in the back:name as many of the crew as you can WITHOUT looking them up.
uwu, stamen, fatty, token 1, token 2, ditka, doug jones but as a space cow, BIG MIKE, and lobot with tits
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
starting clockwise from the leftmost negress in the back:name as many of the crew as you can WITHOUT looking them up.
TOS also had a change in management in season 3. And a reduced budget.TOS is the exception due to CBS having had enough of the show and sidelined it to the 10 o'clock friday timeslot. In general, 90s Star Trek did get better by the third season. DS9 had okay episodes here and there, but it's really seasons 3, 4, and 5 does it get exceptional. Enterprise does get better by season 4, but that was due to a change in management. In fairness to Picard, Matalas is a change in management... sort of. Matalas is a Dave Filoni-type and exerts the kind of influence a middle manager would. He still has to follow company guidelines such as extremely dark lighting, have a young character who's the key to everything, and a sword-wielding maniac that sneaks up on people first, but he has authority otherwise.
But why should I care that the show is now up to Bad TNG movie when The Orville exists?
Enterprise is worth at least one view through.TOS also had a change in management in season 3. And a reduced budget.
IIRC Voyager was never really stellar but it was consistent (barring Threshold). Not sure about "The Rock" episode, never saw it don't know if its threshold bad. Never seen enterprise. Maybe someday. Not couting any of the new shows. They aren't star trek. Will never watch the orville. Why should I give a shit about some show cosplaying as star trek?
Because The Orville is produced by Brannon Braga and is on-brand as a Star Trek show. Nice, even fluorescent lighting, many episodes are episodic, characters are generally pleasant and largely competent.TOS also had a change in management in season 3. And a reduced budget.
IIRC Voyager was never really stellar but it was consistent (barring Threshold). Not sure about "The Rock" episode, never saw it don't know if its threshold bad. Never seen enterprise. Maybe someday. Not couting any of the new shows. They aren't star trek. Will never watch the orville. Why should I give a shit about some show cosplaying as star trek?
Voyager... when it was good, it was VERY good, but when it was bad, it was VERY bad. It's a show that worked because it had excellent casting, but the writing itself often let it down. Enterprise... had less good casting so all the problems in that show were more apparent.Enterprise is worth at least one view through.
The Rock episode was bad but then again so was all of Voyager.
By the time the end of Voyager/Enterprise rolled out trek had been on TV continuously for 13-14 years. Some fatigue had set in so I haven't seen much of the last 3 seasons of Voyager and none of Enterprise.Enterprise is worth at least one view through.
The Rock episode was bad but then again so was all of Voyager.
Now there's a name I haven't heard in a long time. The dude got all sorts of beat up by the fanbase back in the day. Buffy was the hot thing back then. Voyager got slagged for being boring and repetitive. How times change.Because The Orville is produced by Brannon Braga and is on-brand as a Star Trek show. Nice, even fluorescent lighting, many episodes are episodic, characters are generally pleasant and largely competent.
Which is funny because TNG and on were pioneers in using green screen compositing. That's what the Holodeck was really.One thing I do enjoy about Star Trek in general, for the most part still holds true to this day, is their production relying on physical sets and practical effects. They're not yet covering everything in green screen and what not, for the most part.
I've seen a lot of mental gymnastics to make this true, like how Sisko doesn't count because he's not captain of a ship and the likes. Sisko isn't even the first black Captain we've seen in Star Trek.I mostly remember Sonequa-Green from The Walking Dead and I did not like her in that show, so there's a little bias about her role in Discovery, and also I remember reading something how she claimed she was the first Black captain in Star Trek.
I only know Tilly and Obama and that's all we need to know, honestly.Let's play a fun game! If you watched most or all of STD, name as many of the crew as you can WITHOUT looking them up.
Funny how despite they all are white and liberal, each of them has a very distinct personality. IICR, many of them have got different opinions about different things and ethic dilemmas through the show. Membah when they were celebrating Thanksgiving and Willow went full libtard saying it as an offensive holiday while Spike told her to STFU and stop feeling guilty for it. Xander, Giles, and Faith also had very different opinions about Angel than the rest of the gang. Cordelia was very much non PC, calling people "retards" and "lesbos" like it was nothing. Angel was very conservative too (for obvious reason), unlike Spike. Xander was too, in his own way. Anya was a hardcore capitalist. Giles and Wesley were very traditionalists, Buffy never truly cared for rules and was fine with breaking traditions.
I'm watching both Enterprise and Voyager on a "When I'm not doing other shit" basis and I vastly prefer Enterprise's simplicity for now, there's no Starfleet, no Federation, everyone distrusts transporters so they get down to a planet with these very dated shuttlepods.Going to rewatch Voyager fairly soon. I'm betting it will look a lot better compared to the garbage that's on these days.
Might even watch Enterprise.
It's funny because, Sisko aside, there's been Black representation in Star Trek before him, and yet Sonequa ignored the whole bit and jumped ahead.I've seen a lot of mental gymnastics to make this true, like how Sisko doesn't count because he's not captain of a ship and the likes. Sisko isn't even the first black Captain we've seen in Star Trek.
You're right, he isn't.I've seen a lot of mental gymnastics to make this true, like how Sisko doesn't count because he's not captain of a ship and the likes. Sisko isn't even the first black Captain we've seen in Star Trek.
Voyager and Enterprise are great stuff.By the time the end of Voyager/Enterprise rolled out trek had been on TV continuously for 13-14 years. Some fatigue had set in so I haven't seen much of the last 3 seasons of Voyager and none of Enterprise.
Going to rewatch Voyager fairly soon. I'm betting it will look a lot better compared to the garbage that's on these days.
Might even watch Enterprise.
It's funny because beyond the occasional clit-tickling of Uhura for breaking racial barriers that I was way too young to understand (the show had been cancelled for like 30 years by the time I watched it) no one gave a shit about the diversity of Star Trek. The actors and characters were just there and from my perhaps naïve grade schooler perspective, no one was crowbarring in obvious quotas, at least nothing like they are today.It's funny because, Sisko aside, there's been Black representation in Star Trek before him, and yet Sonequa ignored the whole bit and jumped ahead.
Geordie was Geordie. The colour of his skin meant nothing and he didn't jive talk or speak like he was in the hood on Ten Forward in his off-hours.
This'll be interesting to see. First time they're tackling a movie in the main timeline since Nemesis.![]()
Paramount+ Greenlights ‘Star Trek: Section 31’ Film Starring Michelle Yeoh
Paramount+ is officially moving forward on a “Star Trek: Section 31” project starring Michelle Yeoh, but it will now be an event film instead of a series, Variety has learned. It was first reported that a Section 31 series with Yeoh was in development back in 2019. In the film, Yeoh will reprise...ca.news.yahoo.com
So section 31 got the official greenlight.....but as a film rather than a full series
Most notably John Tesh.there were tons of other white guys playing Klingons too
Won't be surprised if it's just yet another piece of fanservice.This'll be interesting to see. First time they're tackling a movie in the main timeline since Nemesis.
After attempting to watch the Halo series, I suspect that a show that focuses on Section 31 will be focused on shitting on the Federation and painting it as a dystopian hellhole.This'll be interesting to see. First time they're tackling a movie in the main timeline since Nemesis.