- Joined
- May 8, 2024
I was curious why O'Brien, an enlisted man, was the chief engineer for a critical space station. turns out the ds9 writers just wanted him to be enlisted, because on TNG he was an officer. Rodenberry wanted everyone on a spaceship to be an officer, like modern day astronauts. they just called him chief O'Brian on TNG becuase he was the transporter chief ,in the same way geordi was chief engineer. if you wanted you could make a silly retcon and say that his officers rank on the ship was a "field promotion" since all ship crews are officers, and when he got tranferred off to ds9 he went back to his original rank, but why bother? for that matter why bother making O'brian enlisted?
I don't know very much about current day military, but it does seem weird to me that the chief engineer of an entire space station, even one considered to be in the backwaters of space as DS9 originally was, should be so low ranked that he would have to salute an ensign like Nog... And yet O'Brien himself said that Nog would indeed outrank him if he became an officer.
Watching an episode of TNG yesterday, saw a part where O'Brien said he was tactical officer on another ship. Demotion?Not that surprising. Chief engineer is still more of a civilian role than a military one and I imagine that the hierarchy was setup for military matters. Meaning that an ensign trained by Starfleet would probably have more military experience/training than most chief engineers. Therefore it makes sense that command would fall to an ensign rather than a Chief engineer should that become necessary.
Its not the case with O'brian since he is a veteran of the cardy war obviously and Nog is just a fresh ensign, but I imagine for most cases the chief engineers probably have never been in serious combat or even received military training and therefore Nog is higher up the chain than O'brian.
On another subject, never watched "Enterprise". How does it compare to "Voyager", which I feel is ok, at best? Will download, if it's worth watching.