- Joined
- Jan 18, 2017
It's called Subtlety™ a concept totally alien to the SSRI/Vyvanse addicted producers, writers, and directors of nuTrek. I'm not even talking about big brain 2deep4u subtlety, I'm just saying Orville actually understood that Trek can take a concept and explore it via aliens and SF and ideally let the ideas be discussed and debated and examined via the premise of different characters with different perspectives on a space ship.The hilarious thing is that Seth fucking MacFarlane with The Orville managed to do political episodes with more tact and wisdom than anyone in the last 10-15 years has been able to. Probably because he realizes the goal of these shows it to be entertaining and not to indoctrinate your audience. Shit, just put him in charge of Star Trek and see how it goes since he seems to actually understand why people liked Star Trek.
Orville also wasn't locked into retarded EVERY EPISODE IS A MYTHOS EPISODE situation that plagues the modern series so badly.
The similarities are so vast it cannot be understated how much of a rip-off DS9 feels like and why JMS should rightfully be pissed. It's a shame that B5 is left totally in the shadows compared to DS9 when I think a ton of fans of the latter would immediately latch onto the former. Which leads me to:If the official line is that DS9 just sprang fully formed with zero overlap or influence, I don't buy it.
Not sure I'd go that far but your point about getting to things faster with less filler is spot on. I think generally it's just better written too. Could also be that it feels refreshing to look at SF races that aren't fucking Klingons or Vulcans.Babylon 5 is better than DS9


