- Joined
- Dec 29, 2015
One of the things I noticed about cartoons by Nickelodeon and Disney Channel is that they often had child characters that were nigh omniscient, with the parents being bumbling idiots. The adults were always the worst. They were the people who lived in a permanent infomercial. How they managed to grow up, succeed at a job, and raise children to the age that the main characters are seems like the epitome of luck.
Well, I get that same feeling with Lower Decks. The children are the omniscient ones, and the "adults" are idiots. What's worse, is that the spunky free spirit is the best of the best, and their genius/luck is what's going to save them every time, with maybe an attempt at a heartfelt episode where the losers teach the main characters some humility... which will be ignored in later episodes.
I remember the show Malcolm in the Middle where the smart kids/ignorant parents was done mostly right (sorry Bryan Cratson's dad character). The kids were brilliant, but unwise. The mother was the opposite. She didn't have the genius of her sons, but she was wise, and she knew what to do. They couldn't one-up her all the time because she knew what they were capable of. Could such a dynamic be replicated in Star Trek form?
I now wonder if we're incapable of having something light-hearted and Trek-y. I poke around places and find that maybe the younger crowds want that, and that's who execs are trying to attract. Case in point, when I was running Star Trek Adventures games for a store, I would have people submit characters that were broken in horrible ways, characers any rational organization like Starfleet would have long ejected. "Yeah, could we not have the schizophrenic Trill with the serial killer symbiont, please?" "But, but! It's tragic!" "No, it's a gimmick. And gimmicks are good for one shots only."
And here I think the show's characters are just gimmicks.
Well, I get that same feeling with Lower Decks. The children are the omniscient ones, and the "adults" are idiots. What's worse, is that the spunky free spirit is the best of the best, and their genius/luck is what's going to save them every time, with maybe an attempt at a heartfelt episode where the losers teach the main characters some humility... which will be ignored in later episodes.
I remember the show Malcolm in the Middle where the smart kids/ignorant parents was done mostly right (sorry Bryan Cratson's dad character). The kids were brilliant, but unwise. The mother was the opposite. She didn't have the genius of her sons, but she was wise, and she knew what to do. They couldn't one-up her all the time because she knew what they were capable of. Could such a dynamic be replicated in Star Trek form?
I now wonder if we're incapable of having something light-hearted and Trek-y. I poke around places and find that maybe the younger crowds want that, and that's who execs are trying to attract. Case in point, when I was running Star Trek Adventures games for a store, I would have people submit characters that were broken in horrible ways, characers any rational organization like Starfleet would have long ejected. "Yeah, could we not have the schizophrenic Trill with the serial killer symbiont, please?" "But, but! It's tragic!" "No, it's a gimmick. And gimmicks are good for one shots only."
And here I think the show's characters are just gimmicks.
Last edited: