Star Trek - Space: The Final Frontier

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Not big on the NX. It almost looked too much like an offshoot of the E rather than a prototype of what would become a main line of the Federation design.

For what its worth I'm getting the eagle moss xl version of the Enterprise A this week. Would have preferred if it was the original refit from the first three movies but I'll concede to your point since it was the only version of that ship available.

Nothing about Enterprise as a whole seems to click with me, I have no real interest in watching it. It just seems uninspired and unnecessary. The only entertainment I've gotten has been at its expense via Chucks reviews. He flat out hates Archer, and his character retrospective video tears him apart. He at least seems to like Janeway when she is written well, just has issues with consistency more than anything else. Still haven't watched DS9, but it is rapidly approaching time to watch over the holidays.
 
The NX didn't do it for me either at first but the more I watch Enterprise the more I start to appreciate it. It's actually not that bad of a show and I really do like how slim and sleek the design is. I'm actually enjoying Enterprise and what's weird is that I'm sure in 2000 when it aired, I probably wouldn't have but compared to what passes for Trek today? It's quite engaging. I think Archer can be a bit over the top in his do gooder writing, almost like a propaganda piece but for the most part I feel the main crew/cast click together and I can believe in their friendships. At times though it does feel like they're trying too hard to copy the Kirk/Spock dynamic with Archer and T'Pol. I have to say T'Pol is by far the most aesthetically sexualized main character in Star Trek that I've seen but I honestly don't mind it not just because she's gorgeous, but her character actually does shit. It's eye candy with a bit of agency.


Still haven't watched DS9, but it is rapidly approaching time to watch over the holidays.

My man, I just powered through all 7 seasons of DS9 and it was fucking incredible. Definitely watch it as soon as you can.
 
The NX didn't do it for me either at first but the more I watch Enterprise the more I start to appreciate it. It's actually not that bad of a show and I really do like how slim and sleek the design is. I'm actually enjoying Enterprise and what's weird is that I'm sure in 2000 when it aired, I probably wouldn't have but compared to what passes for Trek today? It's quite engaging. I think Archer can be a bit over the top in his do gooder writing, almost like a propaganda piece but for the most part I feel the main crew/cast click together and I can believe in their friendships. At times though it does feel like they're trying too hard to copy the Kirk/Spock dynamic with Archer and T'Pol. I have to say T'Pol is by far the most aesthetically sexualized main character in Star Trek that I've seen but I honestly don't mind it not just because she's gorgeous, but her character actually does shit. It's eye candy with a bit of agency.




My man, I just powered through all 7 seasons of DS9 and it was fucking incredible. Definitely watch it as soon as you can.
I'll push up the DS9 marathon then and save TOS for later. My issue is more just finding time than anything else. DS9 has a great reputation so I'm looking forward to it.
 
DS9 does take a lot of influence fron TOS though. Depends on what kind of completionist you are. If you've really got to do stuff in order TOS is paradigm. If you never had an interest in TOS you should probably start with DS9.
 
The more I watch TOS the more I see it in the later series, one that really jumped out at me was Kirk during his trial being accused of murder through negligence. I didn't cross reference but I feel like when his service awards were being read out they were the same that Data had during Measure of a Man.
 
DS9 does take a lot of influence fron TOS though. Depends on what kind of completionist you are. If you've really got to do stuff in order TOS is paradigm. If you never had an interest in TOS you should probably start with DS9.
I watched TOS in full around 2009 and nothing since. I remember thoroughly enjoying it. Grew up watching the movies primarily with an occasional episode of TNG or TOS thrown in. I've also watched most of TNG but not to completion. The only piece of Star Trek media I readily had access to as a kid was the extended cut of TMP on vhs and I wore that tape down. I probably like TMP so much due to Stockholm syndrome.
 
Last edited:
ok, who is reading this thread?

they just played faith of the heart on the radio (rod stewart version tho), I can't even remember the last time I heard it on the radio, if ever...
 
Last edited:
I'm actually enjoying Enterprise and what's weird is that I'm sure in 2000 when it aired, I probably wouldn't have but compared to what passes for Trek today? It's quite engaging.

It is crazy that Discovery, Picard, and Lower Decks have been so awful, it has made me go back and appreciate Enterprise, and especially Voyager. Somehow Voyager has become my second favourite series after TOS. That's how badly Star Trek has fucked itself.
 
That and the crew had kids and stuff on it so they were constantly in harms way basically all the time.

That was such a stupid idea. Why would you want that for a ship that constantly gets into encounters where you have to make life and death decisions for the entire goddamn universe? Knowing your kids were somewhere else would make these decisions a lot easier.
 
It is crazy that Discovery, Picard, and Lower Decks have been so awful, it has made me go back and appreciate Enterprise, and especially Voyager. Somehow Voyager has become my second favourite series after TOS. That's how badly Star Trek has fucked itself.
Voyager ain't that bad, tbh. It can be a bit campy sometimes, but Star Trek has always been campy, even a bit cringy. DS9 is fine, but sometimes people just want Star Trek to continue being dark and serious and all about a war when, sure, that aspect of Star Trek is also necessary, but Janeway's crew was in a different circumstance. Not everything had to be about war.

And the new movies are just that, too serious. No fun allowed.
 
Voyager ain't that bad, tbh. It can be a bit campy sometimes, but Star Trek has always been campy, even a bit cringy. DS9 is fine, but sometimes people just want Star Trek to continue being dark and serious and all about a war when, sure, that aspect of Star Trek is also necessary, but Janeway's crew was in a different circumstance. Not everything had to be about war.

And the new movies are just that, too serious. No fun allowed.
I quoted it before on this thread, I'll recite it from memory here, the interview Ronald D Moore did where he talked about Voyager some.

It's not about the fun - it's not about the camp.

It's about being serious.

And as I've stressed before on here as well, being serious doesn't mean you can't laugh or have fun either, it just means you treat things seriously.

You don't even have to do a war, all you have to do is hold to voyager's fucking premise. Like, ok, instead of year of hell, let's do "year of silly." One season (or a 2 part episode) where Voyager has to go through Talaxian controlled space and each episode they get into sillier and sillier situations that amount to largely side-quests of fun. Know how you make it work? You sell it based on the premise. You have Janeway bitching about something like "I can't stand these hedgehogs! I wish we could be rid of them!" "I know, Captain, but we don't have Starfleet to repair the ship. We need those parts, yada yada."

That's what always annoys me about it more than anything. You could do a swap of actors and 99% of the stories would work just as well in TOS or TNG - them being separated is that irrelevant.

The best parts of voyager were always the parts that actually dealt with the premise for this very reason. 7 or 9? (besides being a fine piece of ass) Totally unique to the show and not really doable anywhere else (since in those you could just ship her off to a federation therapy center). Same with the Doctor. An actual character arc built around the fact that they HAD to keep this guy and work with him. Scorpion 1 & 2? Masterpieces because it worked upon Voyager being alone.

They didn't have to make it gritty and war-torn all the time, they just had to keep it consistent to the set up. They could even had consistent stand-alone A plots, as long as they went with character arcs and long running B plots that looked at the struggle and adaption of a ship stranded.

But they didn't.

That's what always annoys me about Voyager. Enterprise was largely doomed from the start. Kelvin is a waste. Discovery should have been post-Voyager from the start and Picard is another waste. Voyager is by far the show of all them which had the most potential, the most set up, and squandered it all. It is the BIGGEST disappointment.
 
I quoted it before on this thread, I'll recite it from memory here, the interview Ronald D Moore did where he talked about Voyager some.

It's not about the fun - it's not about the camp.

It's about being serious.

And as I've stressed before on here as well, being serious doesn't mean you can't laugh or have fun either, it just means you treat things seriously.

You don't even have to do a war, all you have to do is hold to voyager's fucking premise. Like, ok, instead of year of hell, let's do "year of silly." One season (or a 2 part episode) where Voyager has to go through Talaxian controlled space and each episode they get into sillier and sillier situations that amount to largely side-quests of fun. Know how you make it work? You sell it based on the premise. You have Janeway bitching about something like "I can't stand these hedgehogs! I wish we could be rid of them!" "I know, Captain, but we don't have Starfleet to repair the ship. We need those parts, yada yada."

That's what always annoys me about it more than anything. You could do a swap of actors and 99% of the stories would work just as well in TOS or TNG - them being separated is that irrelevant.

The best parts of voyager were always the parts that actually dealt with the premise for this very reason. 7 or 9? (besides being a fine piece of ass) Totally unique to the show and not really doable anywhere else (since in those you could just ship her off to a federation therapy center). Same with the Doctor. An actual character arc built around the fact that they HAD to keep this guy and work with him. Scorpion 1 & 2? Masterpieces because it worked upon Voyager being alone.

They didn't have to make it gritty and war-torn all the time, they just had to keep it consistent to the set up. They could even had consistent stand-alone A plots, as long as they went with character arcs and long running B plots that looked at the struggle and adaption of a ship stranded.

But they didn't.

That's what always annoys me about Voyager. Enterprise was largely doomed from the start. Kelvin is a waste. Discovery should have been post-Voyager from the start and Picard is another waste. Voyager is by far the show of all them which had the most potential, the most set up, and squandered it all. It is the BIGGEST disappointment.
I always thought that voyager would have been a far superior show if it committed to the extreme survival measures necessary to survive this part of isolated space.

It would fit better with Janeway's bat shit insane strategies and anti-federation like diplomacy. I would have loved to see the ship itself change as they had to replace worn out federation parts that no longer worked with the local space faring races equivalent. Give the ship a lot of character, gives the audience a good idea of how far they have gone based on much like Frankenstein the ship looks, and shows a gradual change not only the ship, but also the crew.

We can see this group of elite federation purists turn into survivors willing to do anything. It would even give the Marqui a lot more "power" over the ship because they are survivors who have the experience these federation pansies desperately need to survive without the support of something like the federation.

I honestly think this was the vision they were going for really early on, but completely lost it. Imagine an ending where we see Voyager come home not as a shining example of the federation, but a barely working mess of a ship. With a crew beaten and worn out by their experiences and the extremes they had to go to in order to survive. It would be actually very bitter sweet for an ending. They finally returned home, but at the same time left a part of themselves out there forever lost to the dangers of the Delta Quadrant.


(this is basically Enterprise Season 3 for an entire show, but Enterprise Season 3 is fucking awesome so sue me)
 
Watching TNG "The Icarus Factor" right now. Still always LOL at imagining Riker's dad being The Great Santini growing up. Bouncing a Parisi Square ball off Lil Wil's noggin, asking if he's gonna cry.
You can't do it, kid. But don't worry, my boy. You're not the only one. No one else can do it. I'm the best!

You with a woman ha! You couldn't even catch a ball!

Gonna cry again? Cry, cry. That's the only thing you're good for.

- Kyle Riker
 
Last edited:
Ambo Jitsu will always be one of my favorite moments, the fact that neither of them had been prepped on how to actually say the Japanese words so they just awkwardly mumble them is perfect. It being the "Ultimate Evolution of Martial Arts" kills me every time as well.
 
I still can't get over those fucking suits they wore. Felt like TRON rejects.
 
Back
Top Bottom