Business Starbucks reverses its open-door policy, requiring people to make a purchase if they want to stay - Hobos in shambles

1736891554647.png

Starbucks is reversing its open-door policy after almost seven years, now requiring that people make a purchase if they want to hang out at its coffee shops or use its restrooms.

The coffee giant said on Monday that a new code of conduct – which will be posted in all company-owned North American stores – will also ban discrimination or harassment, consumption of outside alcohol, smoking, vaping, drug use and panhandling.

The new rules reverse an open-door policy put in place in 2018, after two Black men were arrested at a Philadelphia Starbucks where they had gone for a business meeting. The incident at that individual store, which had a policy of asking non-paying customers to leave, was caught on video and was a major embarrassment for the company.

The change also comes under the new leadership of Brian Niccol, who was hired from Chipotle last year to revitalize the struggling coffee chain. Niccol has vowed to make Starbucks' locations "inviting places to linger," with the goal of reestablishing the chain as the nation's "community coffeehouse."

Starbucks spokesperson Jaci Anderson said the new rules are designed to help prioritize paying customers. Anderson said most other retailers already have similar rules.

"We want everyone to feel welcome and comfortable in our stores," Anderson said. "By setting clear expectations for behavior and use of our spaces, we can create a better environment for everyone."

According to a company statement emailed to CBS News, the coffee chain understands that visitors might need to use the restroom or log into Wi-Fi before making a purchase at the counter. The goal of the new rules is to make its locations more appealing by prioritizing customers, Starbucks said.

Stores may call law enforcement​

The code of conduct warns that violators will be asked to leave, and says the store may call law enforcement, if necessary. Starbucks said employees would receive training on enforcing the new policy.

At the time of the 2018 incident, Starbucks Chairman Howard Schultz said he didn't want people to feel "less than" if they were refused access.

"We don't want to become a public bathroom, but we're going to make the right decision a hundred percent of the time and give people the key," Schultz said.

Since then, though, employees and customers have struggled with unruly and even dangerous behavior in stores. In 2022, Starbucks closed 16 stores around the country — including six in Los Angeles and six in its hometown of Seattle — for repeated safety issues, including drug use and other disruptive behaviors that threatened staff.

Since the pandemic shuttered the economy in early 2020, mental health issues as well as misuse of drugs have increased, as well as homelessness.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/starbucks-open-door-policy-reversal-purchase-now-required/ (Archive)
 
Idk maybe they have a decent customer base in middle aged suburban moms to hold them over?
That is a good portion of their customer base these days. The kind of people you'd think would love Starbucks hate it. Hipsters hated it by the time it was everywhere.
 
was caught on video and was a major embarrassment for the company.
Nobody cared except the people who make money off pretending to care about shit like this, and you idiots took the bait.
I've heard some stories from Starbucks workers about cleaning the bathrooms after this change - needles, shit on walls, and even a few about homeless fuckers sleeping in the bathrooms.
Post some.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chiobu
Bad idea. I mean, not in isolation. But if your main customer base is balls deep in woke nonsense, going hardcore on some dumb woke policy and then reneging... it'll totally fuck you over.
Something to keep in mind is that millennial leftists are also hypocrites and don't actually like seeing hobos in the places they hang out in. NIMBY is their religion. They prefer not to see it but will vocally speak out in its defense.
 
In 2018, two random black guys showed up at a starbucks in Philadelphia. They first tried to use the restrooms, but were told they would have to buy something. So then the sat down at a table and didn't order anything. They claimed they were waiting for a friend. The friend was revealed to be jewish businessman Andrew Yaffe. The story told in the media (largely by Yaffe without attribution) was that these two rando street black guys were in the middle of a giant real estate and business investment deal with Yaffe. That turned out eventually to have been a tremendous overstatement of what was actually going on. Suprisingly (or not) it turned out that the two rando black guys in their early 20s were actually not major players in Philly real estate and business. Though they were constantly referred to as such in the media.

When they wouldn't buy anything or leave, the manager called the police. The police threw them out and cited them for trespassing.

The then-woke CEO of Starbucks removed the store manager, had a special meeting with the black guys to apologize and closed every single Starbucks store for a whole day of education of about racism. This was way before George Floyd. It was back in the days of Colin Kaepernik and "white fragility". There was a whole national thing about how calling the police on black people behaving badly was just wrong.

The fired manager was eventually awarded $25 million dollars by a jury. The two black guys got undisclosed settlements with starbucks. Then they settled with the city in exchange for the city setting up some some program for black people.
 
The fired manager was eventually awarded $25 million dollars by a jury. The two black guys got undisclosed settlements with starbucks. Then they settled with the city in exchange for the city setting up some some program for black people.
So everybody involved got rich as fuck.
 
I remember reading about this incident, yeah it was a bit shitty what happened to them, but why is that justification to allow randos to clog up your service?
Funny that they don't actually explain the incident properly.

I remember. The manager, an ASIAN WOMAN asked them to either make a purchase or they would have to leave. They repeatedly refused so the ASIAN WOMAN tried to trespass them.
This was ofcourse very racist so policies changed and special training was rolled out globally.

An ASIAN WOMAN asked non-customers to leave so all WHITE employees had to take special training to be less racist.
It was hillarious.


And what were the niggers doing there in the first place? They were there to wait for some landlord to sign a rental agreement on some shitty apartment. MSM described this as two major real estate personalities (the two niggers wanting to rent the small apartment) and a jew mega-realestate mogul (your average landlord) making some high-baller mega-real-estate-business-super-deal (signing a rental agreement for a shitty apartment).
You cant hate the media enough.
 
Last edited:
Back