Steve Quest (p/k/a Montagraph) vs. Nicholas Robert Rekieta & Rekieta Law, LLC (2023)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I wouldn't be surprised to see the Ghost of Ethics Sanctions Past brought up.
There is also the fact that he was not at the hearing because he was at the Karen Reed thing trying to be a celebrity lawyer.

No one likes arrogance and egotism and by trying to self-promote using the Karen Reed thing he is saying that he is more important than everyone else involved in this lawsuit. He wasted Hardin's time and the Court's time. Even if he says it was a mistake it still applies that he didn't treat this lawsuit with proper respect.

I expect the court to smack him around a little bit both as a warning and because they really don't like him.
 
I expect the court to smack him around a little bit both as a warning and because they really don't like him.
I certainly hope so, but a series of unfortunate events in Minnesota has moved me a tad closer to the blackpilled "nothing ever happens" bro that I'd prefer not to be.
 
I think Hardin and Randazza came to some sort of deal that means Hardin won't file sanctions over this specific motion.

It's actually a good deal for Hardin and Monty. They don't have to spend time dealing with this or risk not being compensated if they don't get awarded sanctions and the motion goes away. It's a win-win which is what courts want you to negotiate if you can before asking for sanctions.
a series of unfortunate events in Minnesota has moved me a tad closer to the blackpilled "nothing ever happens" bro that I'd prefer not to be.

A deal's looking less likely and there may be some fireworks over the sanctions motion after all, now that Randazza has bothered to put in a response that probably already cost his client more money than simply paying sanctions would have cost him. It was filed late last week but I hadn't seen it posted or discussed here yet:

MCRO_34-CV-23-12_Objection_2025-06-26 (1)_.webp
MCRO_34-CV-23-12_Objection_2025-06-26 (2)_.webp
MCRO_34-CV-23-12_Objection_2025-06-26 (3)_.webp
MCRO_34-CV-23-12_Objection_2025-06-26 (4)_.webp
MCRO_34-CV-23-12_Objection_2025-06-26 (5)_.webp
MCRO_34-CV-23-12_Objection_2025-06-26 (6)_.webp
MCRO_34-CV-23-12_Objection_2025-06-26 (7)_.webp
MCRO_34-CV-23-12_Objection_2025-06-26 (8)_.webp
MCRO_34-CV-23-12_Affidavit of Attorney_2025-06-26 (1)_.webp
MCRO_34-CV-23-12_Affidavit of Attorney_2025-06-26 (2)_.webp

Can't we all just get along?
 
A deal's looking less likely and there may be some fireworks over the sanctions motion after all, now that Randazza has bothered to put in a response that probably already cost his client more money than simply paying sanctions would have cost him. It was filed late last week but I hadn't seen it posted or discussed here yet:


Can't we all just get along?

Did he really forget to mention the very unambiguous savings clause before going into this whole statutory interpretation mumbo jumbo.
:story:


What a legend. Also, Hardin agreed to allow him an extension of time to file the motion. Allowing an extension does not mean that he thinks your motion is meritorious. Wet brain!

Edit: implying he is a “victim of lawfare.” Holy shit.
 
Last edited:
A deal's looking less likely and there may be some fireworks over the sanctions motion after all, now that Randazza has bothered to put in a response that probably already cost his client more money than simply paying sanctions would have cost him. It was filed late last week but I hadn't seen it posted or discussed here yet:


Can't we all just get along?

He talks about "internal inconsistencies" and "ambiguity" in the statute. There is no such ambiguity.

Sec. 13.

[554.19] SAVINGS CLAUSE.

Sections 554.07 to 554.19 do not affect a cause of action asserted before the effective date of sections 554.07 to 554.19 in a civil action or a motion under Minnesota Statutes 2022, sections 554.01 to 554.06, regarding the cause of action.

....

Sec. 17.​

EFFECTIVE DATE.​

This article is effective the day following final enactment and applies to a civil action pending on or commenced on or after that date.

These are not incongruent or ambiguous. In fact, it's quite explicit. A subset of the bill does not apply retroactively (the new anti-SLAPP) while the rest of it does.
 
Also, Hardin agreed to allow him an extension of time to file the motion. Allowing an extension does not mean that he thinks your motion is meritorious. Wet brain!
This probably turns on what was actually said in the conference, and I suspect Hardin will be filing his version soon enough. The explanation of the stipulation seems to change multiple times over the filing, from "all deadlines in the scheduling order" on page 1, to "explicitly agreed to extend the deadline to the anti-SLAPP" on page 5. Then Randazza's declaration says "all dates in the case". If anything is inconsistent in this squabble, it's Rendazza's recollection of events.

First, as a general matter, I would not assume "all deadlines in the scheduling order" or "all dates in the case" include a statutory deadline, at all. That seems to be talking about case-specific or court-set deadlines, not legislative deadlines. If it was meant to include externally-set dates, I would expect a specific all out.

Second, even if Hardin was dumb enough to explicitly allow Nick to file past the legislatively-determined deadline... does he even have that power? I don't think two random lawyers can arbitrarily override a law just by shaking hands. Maybe he could agree "I won't file a challenge on the deadline", but if the law doesn't apply in a case, he can't just agree to make it apply, especially if it's adverse to his own client's interest.

I'd imagine at least the Court itself would have to rule on the question, if it was somehow a question of law. I don't think even the judge could extend the law's stated cutoff, though.
 
It was widely discussed, around the time this case was filed, that it made a certain amount of sense to hire Randazza to try and apply Colorado's anti-SLAPP. It was a novel idea that was probably worth a shot (mind you, this was before people really wised up to how awful Nick was, and how his claims about Monty were utterly baseless).

That having failed, it makes absolutely no sense to keep Randazza now, or not settle. Randazza's recent argument here is so awful, it's stunning to think that his earlier anti-SLAPP argument, and this one, were crafted by the same person.
Hey man, Monty actually is a pedophile and did kill JB Ramsey. He talks all about it under the pseudo name “JBSmeary” in a book he sold on Barnes and Noble call “TwoIsTooYoungToDie” for 2.22$… he started getting money hurt after JBRamsey’s swingset got sold on EBay for a sum of money and made the video “I Am Your Ghost”. He tried making more easy money with more flicks, even hiring that girl for “Miss Piggy and The Umbrella Man”, I wonder how much he forked out for that? He has a website that is “looking for models” called “montography.com” where he can showcase his computing skill. Cmon man, he used to work at Access Graphics and babysat JonBenet, he got his moniker from stitching aerial photography together. He moved here from a communist regime in Romania with his parents, got put in military school for raping a young boy. He changed his name to “Steve Quest” in 1996…

I have a shitload of proof to back all this up and more… I really need to get his employment records from Access Graphics. There’s a pasta I made below:👇🏼

This is Montagraph’s YouTube channel where he shows his face and has a *handprint logo. I wouldn’t bother with too many of his vids but you can hear his illness in every single video, especially after you try to read the “JBSmeary” confessions
https://m.youtube.com/@Montagraph/videos (https://m.youtube.com/@Montagraph/videos)
This is what i found, i used to play this Counterstrike game and believe me they take this game too seriously. The saying was if you die in Counterstrike you die in real life. Compare the game profile and logo to Montagraph’s YouTube logo, also take note of the added /222/.
https://steamcommunity.com/groups/222respect (https://steamcommunity.com/groups/222respect)
Now shortly after JonBenet Ramsey’s swingset was being sold on EBay for a ridiculous sum of money, this JBRamsey confession book named Two Is Too Young Too Die was being sold on BarnesAndNoble for 2.22$ by JBSmeary an anagram for JBRamsey.
https://timothycharlesholmseth.com/jonbenet-ramsey-murder-confession-turned-over-to-donald-j-trump/ (https://timothycharlesholmseth.com/jonbenet-ramsey-murder-confession-turned-over-to-donald-j-trump/)
The confession is not worth reading except for maybe the first page but if you do it would sound a lot like Montagraph’s late night YouTube streams of him talking to himself. Here is that book transcribed to a google docs.
https://docs.google.com/document/u/...7259RPm4IlP4yp3se2FkLUAP7fM/mobilebasic?pli=1 (https://docs.google.com/document/u/...7259RPm4IlP4yp3se2FkLUAP7fM/mobilebasic?pli=1)
To clearify what the /222/ is it mentions Masterchan in the confession. Masterchan was an image posting forum identical to 4chan and Montagraph was the Moderator for a thread called Masterchan.org/222/ and the hyperlink would read “twoistooyoungtodie”. They would buy and sell snuff on this forum anonymously and one user like Peter Scully has been apprehended already, you can google “Hurtcore” and Peter Scully’s name will come up. Also it mentions Masterchan and Hurtcore in Montagraph’s Steam page. I have followed and Archive.org to Masterchan and do have a screenshot of the hyperlink to “twoistooyoungtodie”. Last thing to mention, Montagraph used to work for John Ramsey at his company Access Graphics. He used to “stitch” aerial photography for a military software similar to Google Earth, monta- Latin for world and -graph. He also legally changed his name in 1996 after the murder from “Dale Bennet” to “Steve Quest”. “Steve” is currently trying to sue a Lawyer in MN and the next link the lawyer accuses him of killing JBRamsey.
https://randazza.com/wp-content/uploads/Rekieta-Anti-SLAPP-Opposition.pdf (https://randazza.com/wp-content/uploads/Rekieta-Anti-SLAPP-Opposition.pdf)
Unfortunately like I was saying, they can shuffle around America and end up in concentrations in our government, unfortunately it looks like both Co. and Mn. are some of those places (also Fl. and obviously D.C.)

https://socialmediasmostwanted.com/help-find-youtube-montagraph-predator-troll/ (https://socialmediasmostwanted.com/help-find-youtube-montagraph-predator-troll/)

It was widely discussed, around the time this case was filed, that it made a certain amount of sense to hire Randazza to try and apply Colorado's anti-SLAPP. It was a novel idea that was probably worth a shot (mind you, this was before people really wised up to how awful Nick was, and how his claims about Monty were utterly baseless).

That having failed, it makes absolutely no sense to keep Randazza now, or not settle. Randazza's recent argument here is so awful, it's stunning to think that his earlier anti-SLAPP argument, and this one, were crafted by the same person.
Oh, and I could find frazzled.rip but I found this… /222 actually is real…
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2085.webp
    IMG_2085.webp
    30.1 KB · Views: 12
  • IMG_9331.webp
    IMG_9331.webp
    33.3 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_9332.webp
    IMG_9332.webp
    33.7 KB · Views: 12
  • IMG_9346.webp
    IMG_9346.webp
    34.7 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_9347.webp
    IMG_9347.webp
    33.3 KB · Views: 14
  • IMG_9348.webp
    IMG_9348.webp
    52.8 KB · Views: 14
  • IMG_9349.webp
    IMG_9349.webp
    91.6 KB · Views: 14
  • IMG_9350.webp
    IMG_9350.webp
    64.8 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_9352.webp
    IMG_9352.webp
    38.1 KB · Views: 12
  • IMG_9353.webp
    IMG_9353.webp
    56.5 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_9354.webp
    IMG_9354.webp
    41.8 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_9355.webp
    IMG_9355.webp
    31.5 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_9356.webp
    IMG_9356.webp
    61.6 KB · Views: 12
  • IMG_9357.webp
    IMG_9357.webp
    63.5 KB · Views: 11
  • IMG_9358.webp
    IMG_9358.webp
    37.2 KB · Views: 12
  • IMG_9359.webp
    IMG_9359.webp
    41.1 KB · Views: 10
  • IMG_9360.webp
    IMG_9360.webp
    39.2 KB · Views: 10
  • IMG_9361.webp
    IMG_9361.webp
    58.1 KB · Views: 10
  • IMG_9362.webp
    IMG_9362.webp
    46.2 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_9363.webp
    IMG_9363.webp
    55.4 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_9364.webp
    IMG_9364.webp
    37.3 KB · Views: 10
  • IMG_9324.webp
    IMG_9324.webp
    41.4 KB · Views: 9
Unfortunately like I was saying, they can shuffle around America and end up in concentrations in our government, unfortunately it looks like both Co. and Mn. are some of those places (also Fl. and obviously D.C.)
That cocaine must be FIRE. This is almost worthy of a mass shooting manifesto. Have another snort.
 
View attachment 7601764
Have you considered that the "handprint that proved it all" is just the first handprint image available when you type in "handprint image" on Google Images you retard schizo-fuck?
Bro made an entire schizo conspiracy based on the first handprint image on google LUL
 
Back