Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Zee seethes about Myron calling her a fat jew.
View attachment 8949355

The sexpest pedo who happens to be the most unreliable witness in the world lying about what's happening in his own lawsuit? No way!!!!Unless Destiny is lying about what's happening
Yes.Unless Destiny is lying about what's happening

I guess so man. Just seems a bit off how he's went from depressed and concerned a year ago to now laughing and cheerful about how "retarded" the team on the other side is.The sexpest pedo who happens to be the most unreliable witness in the world lying about what's happening in his own lawsuit? No way!!!!
Ahhh okay that makes more sense then. I figured Pxie was talking about it somewhere too. Or that other woman who I guess was leading it would be.1. Destiny is the only one of the parties commenting on the case publicly, so most of the information you hear will be from him
Hahahah thank you for that. That is a keeper for use when arguing with DGG.Also the court allowed this in, which is fun
Babe, what matters to you? If he sent the sexual media without consent, or if he did it before the statute that would punish him for it?I'm so lost on this situation with the lawsuit but the clips i've seen.. Destiny is certainly winning this isn't he? Unless Destiny is lying about what's happening, her case seems like it's ran by Nick Rekieta style lawyers.
Like man... I want my $50 back Pxie![]()
He could very well get out of this victorious, assuming that he wins on all fronts of this suit due to a mostly indian jury, stasia and the other raped whores do nothing (in stasias case the fronts wouldnt even exist as the only known publication is from 2023), the red state of florida lets his legal charges slide and does nothing for the next 2 years they have to put him on trial, and you accept him being a million in the hole at a time he isn't really making money a part of said victory (he isn't getting paid back lmao), compared to the alternative of spending maybe a third of that as hush money which would have made none of the finding rose + disavowals happen.I'm so lost on this situation with the lawsuit but the clips i've seen.. Destiny is certainly winning this isn't he? Unless Destiny is lying about what's happening, her case seems like it's ran by Nick Rekieta style lawyers.
Like man... I want my $50 back Pxie![]()
Most of the time when I see Tiny "smile" or "laugh", I'm not sure that its a real or involuntary display of emotion.Just seems a bit off how he's went from depressed and concerned a year ago to now laughing and cheerful about how "retarded" the team on the other side is
The CARDII stuff is still the primary statute Pxie is going after right? I recently saw Tiny seething about this idea of a google drive link being described as "continuous disclosure"(or some similar language). So I would assume that is the primary definition that the entire case hangs on, but honestly I have no idea. I didn't follow the Karl Jobst case outside of Karl Jobst coverage of it. Was it clear in the public filings that the defamation was over Jobst claiming that Billy Mitchell got Apollo to commit suicide, or were the details more nebulous than that?He could very well get out of this victorious, assuming that he wins on all fronts of this suit due to a mostly indian jury, stasia and the other raped whores do nothing (in stasias case the fronts wouldnt even exist as the only known publication is from 2023), the red state of florida lets his legal charges slide and does nothing for the next 2 years they have to put him on trial, and you accept him being a million in the hole at a time he isn't really making money a part of said victory (he isn't getting paid back lmao), compared to the alternative of spending maybe a third of that as hush money which would have made none of the finding rose + disavowals happen.
Edit: i will add that the average dgjeet, while confident, is about as well educated on the specifics as a karl jobst fan was when people thought billy would lose and no one cared to check what the quoted defamation instances were.
The idea is that if you were to right now upload someone's nudes to youtube but set those videos to unlisted(not private) then anyone with a link could have accessed it and you were making it available as long as that link was accessible by anyone.I recently saw Tiny seething about this idea of a google drive link being described as "continuous disclosure"(or some similar language)
There is also the screenshot from AbyyMC claiming that he has sent her videos of pixie way before it became public. To me it seems pretty solid because if it wasn't real then why the fuck would she mention Pixie out of everyone? She wasn't someone he was known to hook up with.So I would assume that is the primary definition that the entire case hangs
There is also the screenshot from AbyyMC claiming that he has sent her videos of pixie way before it became public.
The AbbyMC stuff seems like it is either really damning or entirely unconvincing. Each time it comes up it is immediately followed with a request to dismiss.Andy B and the other lawyer did follow up on their MSJ saying to dismiss the case with prejudice because Pxie has no new evidence since AbbyMC's affidavit has been presented. Same old stuff, but with a deposition saying as much now.
Destiny was only questioned about the AbbyMC communications for around 20-30 minutes during his deposition, but I don't think that's really indicative of how that went for either party. Supposedly this was the first time that Steven saw the full, unredacted communication from AbbyMC where she stated she saw the video of Pxie along with Lav and Chaiery. And he just said he had no comment on what he was shown during his deposition,
I understand the concept, but currently there is no precedent for continuous disclosure being covered under this law, that is probably why the AbbyMC stuff is stronger, as it wouldn't need to argue some new precedent, and could just be covered under the existing law. Although, It would be great if Steven Bonnell II set the precedent for a continuously accessible link being covered under CARDII. His delusions of becoming a constitutional attorney might be far fetched, but at least he could make his mark on federal law.The idea is that if you were to right now upload someone's nudes to youtube but set those videos to unlisted(not private) then anyone with a link could have accessed it and you were making it available as long as that link was accessible by anyone.
Meaning that if he send it to [Whore A] 1 day before CARDII, then [Whore A] would send it to [Whore B] 1 day after the CARDII date he should still be responsible for the nudes landing in the [Whore B]'s hands after the CARDII date because he was making it available on his youtube channel.
Now replace youtube and youtube video with a google drive link
Yeah also he started out saying he didn't send her anything and that she found it on his laptop lol. If they actually have her side of the messages, that makes sense why he conjured up two different videos in his excel sheet, but if they can pounce on that lie he seemingly would be fucked. If they actually have her side of the messages he's likely fucked already. That's huge.There was a moment in Steven’s retelling of the depo where he was shown AbbyMC messages, but with redactions (implied to be his deletions) and the direction of the questioning did sound like it was one of probably numerous instances Joan was trying to create enough doubt for their motion for spoliation to work out.
Seems really weird she would need to point out redactions if he provided a full production. I also have a very hard time believing he would still be playing word games with Google Drive videos, directories, and links if there wasn’t a record to create ambiguity around. Those old discord DMs from Destiny explaining to some other girl how to access his unsecured Google Drive link in incognito mode still comes to mind.
Who knows what he really provided since he just recreated the logs himself.Seems really weird she would need to point out redactions if he provided a full production.
If this goes unnoticed in the deliberations, my scant respect for the judicial process will somehow further diminish. Didn't think possibleWho knows what he really provided since he just recreated the logs himself.