Stinkditch Meta Thread

Sorry if this is the wrong thread or if it's been posted already but I am compelled to share this wonder. I wish I could post it everywhere.

Behold, "‘Brazilian Deaf-Mute Transwoman’ sings Whitney Houston’s ‘I will always love you'"



 
  • Lunacy
  • Horrifying
  • Feels
Reactions: cinnamon doggie, RussianBlonde, MavisBeaconTeachesSnipin and 7 others
NoonmanR said:
Trannies on dicksword are now taking to "subtly" shilling their new DIY HRT guide. This was plastered all over the british government discord that recently opened up:
diyhrt.wiki

The DIY HRT Directory

All the information you need to be informed on DIY Hormone Replacement Therapy
diyhrt.wiki diyhrt.wiki

Gee, i wonder why they don't want people knowing about the new bathtub estrogen guide. Forgive if this is just the shit keffals was shilling, but i was under the impression that was deleted.


TBH on some level keeping your kid ignorant about them is a mistake. Like don't get me wrong, i ain't saying they should be explicitly taught gender garbage especially from a hopped up predator pretending to be a woman, but i don't know. From what i can tell staying ignorant only makes it that much easier for them to convert the child.
Click to expand...
it's like telling them about scientologists or mormons. it is a from of protection imo.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Lead Sammich
In light of Matt Walsh's stupid "millions" of kids on blockers, can someone give me a more accurate general accounting of the numbers for annual surgery rates & hormone blockers for minors in the US/Europe?
 
Gender Critical feminism is where it's at. No tolerance for transgenderism, pornography, prostitution, adultery, drag kids. Actually puts their money where their mouth is when it comes to helping women.

I support every TERF out there, I'm pretty sure I meet the definition of one myself. It's crazy in the past ten years I've gone from making fun of Andrea Dworkin to realizing she was right about a lot, and it SUCKS.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: 90 Seconds, Monkey Sea Monkey Drown, Crepidodera fulvicornis and 21 others
Considering Alex Caraballo has become one of the central figures of the slowly emerging troon/journo alliance that's attempting to deplatform Twitter, could his thread be moved to the Stinkditch? Pretty much the entirety of Alex's buffoonery in the field of law is only in service to his activism deplatforming campaigns against anyone he deems a transphobe, which takes much more of a primary role in his public persona than being a lawyer does.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: 陰毛は多い方がいい, Markass the Worst, Nuns with guns and 5 others
  • Agree
Reactions: NoonmanR
Right-winger Mark Dice did a great video with a litany of outrages, a parade of horribles. Some of it is very old news (eg Desmond is Amazing on GMA) and probably should have been excluded, but some of it is new and disturbibg. Next time some freak asks you how any of this affects you, recall just some of these outrages.

 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: GenderCop, Snuckening2, AStupidMonkey and 2 others
So now that Oli London has denounced transitioning into the other sex, is his thread here still appropriate or should it be moved back to where it was?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: GenderCop
Monkey Pink said:
Gender Critical feminism is where it's at.
Click to expand...
>Gender
>Critical
>Feminism
if you adhere in any form to an ideology who's name contains even a single word from that little list you've already made a massive mistake(though you should never adhere to an ideology anyways, but that's another argument all together). All of these are major red flags for insanity, and unhinged views of reality; the fact that they've smooshed them all together is a feat in and of itself, but not one to be admired.
 
  • Autistic
  • Dumb
  • Like
Reactions: GenderCop, Oilspill Battery, T.E.R.F and 5 others
Monkey Pink said:
Gender Critical feminism is where it's at. No tolerance for transgenderism, pornography, prostitution, adultery, drag kids. Actually puts their money where their mouth is when it comes to helping women.

I support every TERF out there, I'm pretty sure I meet the definition of one myself. It's crazy in the past ten years I've gone from making fun of Andrea Dworkin to realizing she was right about a lot, and it SUCKS.
Click to expand...
As a TERF I'm in full support of pornography and prostitution, it's a business, not a lifestyle or ideology. I have never heard of a brothel or porn studio employees wanting to come to your kids' preschool to read them books or teach them anything.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Dislike
Reactions: Crepidodera fulvicornis, World Famous Quasi Payer, assigned Karen at birth and 6 others
  • Informative
Reactions: GenderCop and ScooterL
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: GenderCop, Deepland Bystander and A Fucking Houseplant
Kerr Avon said:
Try again

:story:
Click to expand...

In the last chapter of Hating Woman (1974), where those quotes are from, Dworking also endorsed beastiality, incest and pedofilia. She would later denounce the entire chapter and went on to endorse Janice Raymond's The Transsexual Empire: The Making of the She-Male (1979).

From Raymond's Doublethink (2022):
...After feminist writer Andrea Dworkin’s death in 2005, considerable
attention has been paid to Dworkin’s opinions about transgender.
Dworkin’s life partner, John Stoltenberg, has channeled and
championed Dworkin as a trans ally, singling me out as guilty of
the biological essentialism that Andrea would have abhorred.

...it was The Transsexual Empire that
precipitated our friendship. Dworkin read the manuscript in process
and contributed an endorsement published on the cover of the
paperback edition that read:
Janice Raymond’s The Transsexual Empire is challenging, rigorous, and
pioneering. Raymond scrutinizes the connections between science,
morality, and gender. She asks the hard questions and her answers
have an intellectual quality and ethical integrity so rare, so important,
that the reader wants to think, to enter into a critical dialogue with
the book.
Hardly a ‘deplorable’ view of my work!

...I can’t quell the thought that Stoltenberg joins the crowd of
mansplainers who tell women that we don’t know what we are
doing and explain to us what is wrong with our ‘obsession’. But at the
same time, I know that Andrea Dworkin understood the difference
between biological essentialism and a political materialist analysis
that recognizes women have sexed bodies that no man can simply
wear.

...In the final chapter of Woman Hating, Dworkin had also
affirmed incest and bestiality. Jenefsky wrote that this chapter
centered on a multisexual paradigm that Dworkin believed at the
time were repressed practices and should be accommodated in an
‘androgynous world’. Dworkin admitted she was wrong in her last
chapter of Woman Hating so it’s doubly wrong that Stoltenberg is
perpetuating an analysis of transsexualism that Andrea would not
have affirmed today. Funny, I don’t see him defending her early views
on incest and bestiality, both of which Dworkin had supported in
her last chapter.

...Dworkin wrote that it was mainly through getting responses to
Woman Hating and in developing her future writings that she became
critical about this final chapter (Jenefsky, 1998, p. 139). In 1977,
I wrote one of those responses in an article called ‘Transsexualism:
the Ultimate Homage to Sex-Role Power’. I quoted Dworkin and said
that in her “otherwise insightful” book, Woman Hating, she stated
that sex-change operations should be provided by the community
as one of its functions (Raymond, 1977). Dworkin only objected to
my words, “otherwise insightful.”
Wiki:

Dworkin's work from the early 1980s onward contained frequent condemnations of incest and pedophilia as one of the chief forms of violence against women, arguing once that "incest is a crime committed against someone, a crime from which many victims never recover."[108] In the early 1980s, she had a public row with her formerly admired friend Allen Ginsberg, with whom she shared godparent status of a mutual friend's child. The intense disagreement was over his support for child pornography and pedophilia, in which Ginsberg said, "The right wants to put me in jail." Dworkin responded, "Yes, they're very sentimental; I'd kill you."[109]
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Hubelublub, GenderCop, AStupidMonkey and 5 others
Registration is open and it reminded me I wanted to say something to the trans women who have been victimized by Kiwi Farms, particularly by the vicious TERFs on the Beauty Parlor. I know how these girls are, and I just wanted to say first how sorry I am that happened to you.

If you want people to be kind to you because you're "vulnerable wominxes," maybe protect women and children first. And just to be clear, I mean real women and real children, not 46 year old dudes in diapers and toddler dresses. Man to man, stop this shit, because you're hurting women and children, and if the cost of "being your true self" is being a menace to society, the price is too high, and you should get out before you wake up after you're in too deep and you see the only way out as suicide. You will inevitably take this as "anti-trans" rhetoric. I would like you to change and grow as a person who serves others, rather than a useless eater who thinks it's okay to not only joke about raping women, but help teenagers forever damage their fertility, kidneys, heart, and bones through abusing drugs. Kiwi Farms can be a safe haven for you where you can get outside your hugbox and really think if what you've gotten yourself into is a good fit. There are some good-hearted trans people on this forum who probably could help you live a better life. There are people like myself cheering for you to be the best version of yourself. I don't know all the wonderful things about you, but I do know you're stuck in an ideology riddled with evil people, and if you can't see that it's making you evil, may God have mercy on your soul.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Optimistic
Reactions: David Glowie, Bob Abooey, assigned Karen at birth and 10 others
Jetski Blues said:
In the last chapter of Hating Woman (1974), where those quotes are from, Dworking also endorsed beastiality, incest and pedofilia. She would later denounce the entire chapter and went on to endorse Janice Raymond's The Transsexual Empire: The Making of the She-Male (1979).

From Raymond's Doublethink (2022):
...After feminist writer Andrea Dworkin’s death in 2005, considerable
attention has been paid to Dworkin’s opinions about transgender.
Dworkin’s life partner, John Stoltenberg, has channeled and
championed Dworkin as a trans ally, singling me out as guilty of
the biological essentialism that Andrea would have abhorred.

...it was The Transsexual Empire that
precipitated our friendship. Dworkin read the manuscript in process
and contributed an endorsement published on the cover of the
paperback edition that read:
Janice Raymond’s The Transsexual Empire is challenging, rigorous, and
pioneering. Raymond scrutinizes the connections between science,
morality, and gender. She asks the hard questions and her answers
have an intellectual quality and ethical integrity so rare, so important,
that the reader wants to think, to enter into a critical dialogue with
the book.
Hardly a ‘deplorable’ view of my work!

...I can’t quell the thought that Stoltenberg joins the crowd of
mansplainers who tell women that we don’t know what we are
doing and explain to us what is wrong with our ‘obsession’. But at the
same time, I know that Andrea Dworkin understood the difference
between biological essentialism and a political materialist analysis
that recognizes women have sexed bodies that no man can simply
wear.

...In the final chapter of Woman Hating, Dworkin had also
affirmed incest and bestiality. Jenefsky wrote that this chapter
centered on a multisexual paradigm that Dworkin believed at the
time were repressed practices and should be accommodated in an
‘androgynous world’. Dworkin admitted she was wrong in her last
chapter of Woman Hating so it’s doubly wrong that Stoltenberg is
perpetuating an analysis of transsexualism that Andrea would not
have affirmed today. Funny, I don’t see him defending her early views
on incest and bestiality, both of which Dworkin had supported in
her last chapter.

...Dworkin wrote that it was mainly through getting responses to
Woman Hating and in developing her future writings that she became
critical about this final chapter (Jenefsky, 1998, p. 139). In 1977,
I wrote one of those responses in an article called ‘Transsexualism:
the Ultimate Homage to Sex-Role Power’. I quoted Dworkin and said
that in her “otherwise insightful” book, Woman Hating, she stated
that sex-change operations should be provided by the community
as one of its functions (Raymond, 1977). Dworkin only objected to
my words, “otherwise insightful.”
Wiki:

Dworkin's work from the early 1980s onward contained frequent condemnations of incest and pedophilia as one of the chief forms of violence against women, arguing once that "incest is a crime committed against someone, a crime from which many victims never recover."[108] In the early 1980s, she had a public row with her formerly admired friend Allen Ginsberg, with whom she shared godparent status of a mutual friend's child. The intense disagreement was over his support for child pornography and pedophilia, in which Ginsberg said, "The right wants to put me in jail." Dworkin responded, "Yes, they're very sentimental; I'd kill you."[109]
Click to expand...
"In the final chapter of Woman Hating, Dworkin had also affirmed incest and bestiality."

What the absolute fuck. This tells me nothing except this chick was a whole pair of enchiladas and half a serving of Spanish rice short of anything like a combination plate.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: World Famous Quasi Payer, pork and beans and Beating_Women
Larry David's Crypto Fund said:
"In the final chapter of Woman Hating, Dworkin had also affirmed incest and bestiality."

What the absolute fuck. This tells me nothing except this chick was a whole pair of enchiladas and half a serving of Spanish rice short of anything like a combination plate.
Click to expand...
So, this was kind of utopian thinking typical of the era. These things, in the utopian understanding, could be allowed in the coming "androgynous world" after the fall of the patriarchy. The patriachy being the source of sexual violence and oppression.

To understand this, it is a little like saying that blood sports can not be allowed under capitalist system (because the inherent exploitation), but could be allowed in a post-capitalist post-scarcity utopia, where the un-exploited participants could now genuinely consent to a fight to the death for sport.

This kind of utopinism was largery abandoned to 1970s and you'd be hard pressed to find it in contemporary mainstream radical feminist thinking.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: World Famous Quasi Payer, GenderCop, pork and beans and 2 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back