Stinkditch Meta Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
A Tumblr Terf's FOIA request on tranny crime statistics came in; the big news here is the most common reason TIM troons are arrested, at 47.62%, is sex crimes, while TIF poons most commonly get arrested for drugs at 55.15%.
 

Attachments

  • Tumblr_l_1834399752823610.jpg
    Tumblr_l_1834399752823610.jpg
    102.8 KB · Views: 170
  • Tumblr_l_1834387929847640.jpg
    Tumblr_l_1834387929847640.jpg
    140.6 KB · Views: 170
  • Tumblr_l_1834384724691071.jpg
    Tumblr_l_1834384724691071.jpg
    137.9 KB · Views: 143
  • Tumblr_l_1834382097657528.jpg
    Tumblr_l_1834382097657528.jpg
    116.2 KB · Views: 173
I'm irritated that a lot of gender critical activists are just grifting at this point. The UK seems more organized about getting politicians on their side. In the US people seem to be more promoting their Substacks and Twitters. You know Glinner has "The Mess We're In" podcast? He mentioned Griffin Sivret twice and just said it's a shame. Exulansic has at least 3 posts about her on her Substack. But she doesn't seem to do much actual advocacy. Neither does the lady who writes songs. Neither do any of them. They mostly just gossip about each other. It's like the breast cancer charities that sell endless pink merch to "raise awareness." Everyone is aware at this point, is there a plan for a phase 2 of this delightful catfighty-infighty movement?

Griffin was operated on EIGHT times for phalloplasty in just 2 years. It's SO unethical. Couldn't the doctors have said "look we HAVE to take that thing off we'll try again in six months." How are they still licensed to operate? Can't these "activists" pressure someone to investigate the doctors? It's a public health issue if surgeons are straight up harming people.

Am *I* going to have to do something, write to some politician or something? Would that even work? I don't think I want to get involved but goddamn no one is doing anything useful. It's really irritating. Sorry just needed to vent.
 
Yeah I've read a few terf adjacent substacks and it annoys me too. If a TIM died because of stinkditch complications or suicide all terfs would be dancing on his grave..but no poor Makayla ( sure, of course, another young life lost to this idiocy I'm not disputing that ) was a lost soul and so forth.
Her parents were wholly complicit for whatever reason and went along bombarding her with opposite sex hormones and all the shit fellow kiwis know fully well.
It's a constant replay of Kurtz...
The horror..the horror
 
Random clip of troons, struggling to explain how they're totally not castrated men in ridiculous get ups, anno 1971.
Well, except for the first one, he's just an asshole but at least he knows he isn't a woman.
Take note how he mentioned that he won't be doing this forever - glimmers of self awareness, the kinds of which is today rarely seen, if ever.
 
Can someone help me find some material, any really, on Lou Sullivan?
I can't find any criticism, all I found in regard to her work is "pivotal, important, groundbreaking" and nothing else.
There's nothing on ovarit or reduxx and very little on YouTube ( mainly tranny praising her for getting aids )
 
  • Like
Reactions: WhiteNiggasGardens
A new documentary is out, about "trans widows", women who were married to men who decided to troon out during their marriage. Lots of testimony from the women, and discussions about how hard it is to divorce these men due to the legal language changing, and calling men women instead of what they actually are. Put on Youtube for free, because the woman who made this isn't a faggot grifter selling a subscription.
She also previously released another documentary called Dysphoric for free on Youtube. It's in four parts, so I'll post the playlist if you've never seen it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8taOdnXD6o&list=PLRU9NIX0AA143z2QKukQcOqS96qriKGyw
 
About the Wu thread, there’s a topic I am interested in there but feel it might derail it.

There seems to be a growing consensus that public sentiment is turning away from the transgender agenda. But I don’t know what I could point to in order to definitely prove that. I do not trust polls because they are made to shape public opinion rather than reflect it.

Is there another metric we can use to gauge if “the people” are finally fed up with men pantomiming women?
 
About the Wu thread, there’s a topic I am interested in there but feel it might derail it.

There seems to be a growing consensus that public sentiment is turning away from the transgender agenda. But I don’t know what I could point to in order to definitely prove that. I do not trust polls because they are made to shape public opinion rather than reflect it.

Is there another metric we can use to gauge if “the people” are finally fed up with men pantomiming women?
I don't know about the public. But where it really matters: companies, governments, institutions, that control our lives: I do not see the evidence. I see doubling and tripling down. I see the British Medical Association management deciding its members should 'critique' the Cass review. I see the UN cementing its "all trans all the time" agenda. I see men participating in women's sports and handmaidens all over the world supporting it. I see the judiciary deciding trans women are and ought be treated the same way as actual women in every facet of society. I see hospitals and medical research refusing to target education about exclusively female cancers to women. I see the signs in my bathroom at work telling me the bathroom is based on gender identity. I see Hollywood memory-holing the actual history of trans celebrities.

When I see a single piece of legislation rolled back or repealed in my jurisdiction, I'll be more optimistic. But there is no good reason to let down you guard right now.
 
I don't know about the public. But where it really matters: companies, governments, institutions, that control our lives: I do not see the evidence. I see doubling and tripling down. I see the British Medical Association management deciding its members should 'critique' the Cass review. I see the UN cementing its "all trans all the time" agenda. I see men participating in women's sports and handmaidens all over the world supporting it. I see the judiciary deciding trans women are and ought be treated the same way as actual women in every facet of society. I see hospitals and medical research refusing to target education about exclusively female cancers to women. I see the signs in my bathroom at work telling me the bathroom is based on gender identity. I see Hollywood memory-holing the actual history of trans celebrities.

When I see a single piece of legislation rolled back or repealed in my jurisdiction, I'll be more optimistic. But there is no good reason to let down you guard right now.
Sometimes I wish it would escalate rapidly. As in society will double down on the troonery thing until it becomes such a huge problem, so they have to nuke it from orbit, and there wont even be a discussion regarding if that was the best solution or not.
 
The UK seems more organized about getting politicians on their side. In the US people seem to be more promoting their Substacks and Twitters
I don't know if this merits its own thread, but could you or any other Bri'ish (@Otterly?) explain how the GC/TERF movement got as strong as it is in the UK?

I'd expect the UK to be more pozzed than the US due to centralized government, no Constitutionerino etc...maybe I'm unfairly ignoring RW governors and groups like Moms 4 Liberty because they would simply be declared terrists in the UK. But at the national level, the UK seems to still have "single sex spaces" and protections for women who want a doctor of the same sex, whereas the USgov just declares "sex = gender identity = meaningless".

Has the US just done a better job tard-wrangling its Leftists into intersectional lockstep, while the UK with no real RW party has a more splintered left? Is there some other historical path I'm unaware of? Or am I just wrong in my assessment?
 
I don't know if this merits its own thread, but could you or any other Bri'ish (@Otterly?) explain how the GC/TERF movement got as strong as it is in the UK?
There is a strong ‘don’t tell me what to think’ streak in native Brits. You may laugh at that and with the current degree of pozz I wouldn’t blame you, but there is a bit of the national psyche that simply will not do what it’s told to. We do not like it. It’s slowly being bashed out of us via the suffocating woke stuff. But a little of it survives. Queen Liz 1 famously settled the fact she wasn’t carrying on with a lot of religious persecution by saying she ‘would not make windows into men’s souls.’ That spirit isn’t quite dead yet, and we are still wellington’s scum/salt of the earth.

So there’s that, and there’s also mumsnet. Mn is a parenting site, it allows men no problem, men are parents too, but it’s very female oriented. That and it’s somewhat skewed towards a more middle class demographic (there’s also netmums, which is more working class and yes it’s very much a people’s front of Judea situation but whatever.)

Women started expressing very mild concern on MN. Stuff like ‘there was a man in our local swimming pool women’s change with an erection, staring at my female child as she changes and I complained and was kicked out and I’m rather cross.’ People started asking wtf is this stuff it’s gross
The troons attacked hard. They do not like being told no. They swatted the founder, Justine and they took legal action to try to get her to dox people. The site has to work within the ridiculous bounds of British lack of free speech so they rather cleverly put in restrictions on speech that were very specific and very within the law but allowed the general tone of mockery to continue. This was a master stroke because it took away the ability of the troons to use the hate speech laws. The boards were respectfully moderated for all the right buzzwords but still allowed us to take the piss and expose wrongdoing, the troons attacked again but they were taking a big L.

Now there’s a LOT of women in MN who troons would consider silly little women but who in reality have a considerable amount of money, power or access to those who do. They started organising offline. This is key, you can’t do a lot of this stuff online. You have to go down the pub or meet in living rooms. It has to be in real life. And all those women started doing stuff and talking to people.
Like I said, the demographic of MN is professional and connected. And contrary to what a lot of men who hate women think, women are very, very capable of efficient execution of project planning. Some of us do it for a living.
There’s clearly a divide in the civil service as well, and clearly some of them are very connected and pushing against it.
We also have a national health service and part of that is a body called NICE who decide what treatments are worth the money. When money is limited, they have power. The cass report I suspect was the culmination of a lot of wrangling behind the scenes becasue as soon as it came out action was taken with it as justification.

So it’s a lot of things. But a huge amount of it has been very ordinary women standing up and saying no. They have been very courageous to do so, and many of them have faced life damaging actions from the police and state for doing so.
When I’m queen, I shall put a statue up to them on the fourth plinth,
 
I'd expect the UK to be more pozzed than the US due to centralized government, no Constitutionerino etc.
The UK is different because it has a Constitution, just not a written one. It's like, we nitpick over the Second Amendment and what a "well-regulated militia" means, for example. And a lot of Americans sort of know the words but not the music of the Constitution, if that makes sense? In the UK it's more like, they all know what the "Constitution" means but no one has words and phrases to nitpick over.

Lobbying as it exists in the US does not exist in the UK. Our lobbying here is like the wild west.

The UK has 2 major political parties but smaller ones also get national coverage. So it's not like the US where lobbyists have bought off the Dems & Republicans. Right now, a major Kamala Harris donor has openly asked her to be more 'business-friendly.' The Dems portray themselves as a party for workers but they're basically the same as Republicans except on abortion in some cases.

The UK usually has an actual opposition to the ruling party, with different ideas that they yap about loudly.
There is a strong ‘don’t tell me what to think’ streak in native Brits.
I think it's that, definitely, but also you have a stronger educational system. The second women's spaces came under attack people were Tweeting photos of that feminist who followed Churchill around and would ring a bell whenever he tried to speak. In the US we vaguely know there were suffragettes somewhere but more because of Mary Poppins and less because we had to take 3 years of history to graduate from high school.

The fight for women to get the vote was also more violent over there, women were like actually trampled by police horses etc. In the US and Canada women getting the vote was partly about WWI, people were like, we will never let you send our sons "over there" over nothing again. So in England women are more aware that women had to fight for space in the public sphere.

Also, it's probably partly because your Jewish population skews more conservative than ours and you have more Muslims. I used to live in LA, I've been to Wi Spa and was shocked when I heard a man was in the women's spaces and the facility said they have to let him be there. In LA you can't smoke anywhere...except hookah lounges. They're basically exempt because of "culture." So I was shocked they were even forcing Koreans to let trannies into the women's section at a spa. Usually "culture" and "diversity" trump everything in LA, even regs about smoking in public, but I guess trannies are more victim-group than Koreans.

In the UK some sex-segregated swimming facility (something ponds?) tried to say trannies can be in the women's area, and the conservative Jews and other religious got upset. In some forms of Judaism, men won't even shake hands with women they're like Mike Pence level afraid of the sexes ever being alone together or having physical contact. So like, that's a group that's good at organizing and made noise about it. In the US there aren't that many public pools anymore, places run by the city or county, and anyone who can afford not to use them doesn't. We haven't had nice things that are publicly owned for a while; that's part of why we aren't organizing to keep them.
 
There is a strong ‘don’t tell me what to think’ streak in native Brits.
Agree but same can be said for Americans (which maybe just lives on locally, even as it's being HR-Longhoused nationally), and Aussies (who showed they've become obedient slaves during covid). When will Brits demand their guns back, for example?

They swatted the founder, Justine and they took legal action to try to get her to dox people. The site has to work within the ridiculous bounds of British lack of free speech so they rather cleverly put in restrictions on speech that were very specific and very within the law but allowed the general tone of mockery to continue.
I'm familiar with MN but not the full back story so thank you for that. Always wondered how it stayed active without a bunch of troons and (NGO) lawyers giving them the "bake the AIDS cake!" treatment from the government side, and the "build your own app store / payment processor / bank / web host" treatment that Gab/Rumble/KF etc got on the corporate side. I figured maybe they were hosted abroad or something...
 
I stumbled across this reddit post that argues that if you see Mickey Mouse as a male and Minnie Mouse as a female, then you’re agreeing that gender is a social construct. What do you all think?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8576.jpeg
    IMG_8576.jpeg
    1,010.4 KB · Views: 60
Back