I agree, at least with the likes of GoldenKnight. He doesn't really seem to produce enough to warrant his own whole section, though it may just be a dry season. I feel there should be a greater establishment, as with Jace, before the next step is taken.
That's why I like the 'spotlight function' in the General Lolcow section, being used now for TJ and WBL. Both don't warrant their own sections, but just highlighting them works as well.
Holdek, to be blunt, I fucking hate you. You're responsible for at least half of my negative ratings. Every time you give me a negative rating I write your name down on a piece of paper and then burn it.
But goddamnit I agree with you. This is the cwcki forum. Not the lolcow forum.
(also I'm just joking about the first part of my post)
Its prolly been said already but I don't think members with no posts should be allowed to give ratings.
I've noticed a fair bit of it recently and it makes me suspect cowardly cunts socks.
I can never tell if you're whining for the sake of it, or if you're trying to make a valid point.
Some time after I initially added the Moleman thread, I ran some numbers. Between the 2 extant Lolcow boards and the 3 Chris boards, it was about a 40:60 ratio in Chris' favor. These times have changed.
(Data represents posts made in the last 7 days)
While it's true that Jace may not get as much discussion as Chris does, it's because this isn't the Jace forums. Historically speaking, the people that come to this website have cameforcwc. 90%+ of our audience has ties to that board.
However, it is absolutely retarded to think that Jace doesn't deserve recognition. Same goes for The Golden Knight. Think whatever you want about them, but people like them. They're a flavor, and you don't have to personally like a flavor for it to be good.