US Super Tuesday discussion and results

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Live voting results: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/03/03/us/elections/live-analysis-super-tuesday.html

Polls close in Vermont and Virginia at 4pm PST/7pm EST, North Carolina at 4:30pm PST/7:30pm EST, Tennessee, Maine, Texas, Alabama, Massachusetts, and Oklahoma at 5pm PST/8pm EST, and in Arkansas at 5:30pm PST/8:30pm EST. Polls close in Colorado and Minnesota at 6pm PST/9pm EST, in Utah at 7pm EST/10pm EST, and in California at 8pm PST/11 p.m. ET.

Joe Biden
1582582155486.jpg

Bernie Sanders
1579043026074.jpg

Michael Bloomberg
1582647669172.jpg

Elizabeth Warren

Elizabeth_Warren,_official_portrait,_114th_Congress.jpg


The first day of the Democratic contest that really matters for the cold, hard delegate math — Super Tuesday — is almost here.

Tuesday, March 3, will be enormously important because it’s the first day that a lot of the delegates necessary to win the nomination are at stake, and the biggest delegate day overall. A total of 14 states and one territory — including California and Texas, the two most populous states in the country — will hold their primaries or caucuses.

Candidates are competing for about a third of the overall delegates at stake. Those 1,344 delegates allocated on Super Tuesday could effectively settle the race, if one candidate locks down a gigantic lead that will be nearly impossible for anyone else to overcome. The candidate with the best chance of doing that is Sen. Bernie Sanders — his current lead in the polls indicates he can theoretically rack up enough plurality wins in a crowded field to clean up in delegates.

But it’s also possible that Super Tuesday’s delegate haul ends up split among several candidates, with no one having gotten anywhere close to being on track for a majority. That may well mean Democrats are headed to a contested convention.

Whether we’re headed for one of these outcomes (or something in between) depends to a significant extent on Democrats’ complicated delegate allocation rules.


Broadly, delegates are allotted proportionally based on candidates’ performance — the better you do, the more delegates you get. But quirks in the rules mean relatively small differences in the exact split of the votes can lead to large differences in delegates.

We’ll get into the nitty-gritty below. The big picture is that if one person ends up with a commanding lead and gets nearly half the delegates, that candidate will become the overwhelming favorite for the nomination. But if the delegate leader has a narrow edge and is well below half of the delegates, a long, close-fought contest will likely ensue.

1) Why is Super Tuesday a big deal?
It’s simple: There are a whole lot of delegates at stake.

The way to win the Democratic nomination is by winning delegates — specifically, winning 1,991 out of 3,979 pledged delegates, enough for a majority to get the nomination at the Democratic National Convention. And there are 1,344 delegates — one-third of the total — up for grabs in Super Tuesday’s contests.

Though there will be several more months of primaries remaining, it’s possible that Super Tuesday can settle the nomination contest. It’s not mathematically possible to reach the “magic number” of delegates yet — but Al Gore in 2000 and John Kerry in 2004 won so convincingly on Super Tuesday that their opponents quit shortly afterward.

Yet Super Tuesday can also pave the way for a very long race. In 2008, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama ended up nearly tied after an early February Super Tuesday, and they battled it out through four months of remaining contests. In 2016, Clinton locked in a solid advantage over Sanders on Super Tuesday that she never relinquished — but it wasn’t such an overwhelmingly dominant performance as to drive Sanders to quit the race, so he stayed in.

2) Why is there a Super Tuesday?
No one person or group dictates the primary calendar from the top down. The national Democratic and Republican parties have declared that the month of February is reserved only for the four early states — Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, and South Carolina. But after that, it’s just up to states to schedule primaries whenever they want between March and June.

Many states that want to influence the outcome of the nomination have calculated that the best way to do that is to go as early as possible: on the first Tuesday in March. (This dynamic has been called “frontloading.”)

Super Tuesday actually began as a plot to help President Jimmy Carter stave off a primary challenge from Ted Kennedy in 1980, as Carter’s strategists got three large Southern states where he was expected to do well to schedule their primaries early. From 1984 through 1992, other Southern states joined in an attempt to give their region more influence (as did a few non-Southern states).

super_tuesday_delegate_board_fix.jpg


Eventually, big states from elsewhere in the country wanted in, and the first Super Tuesday that truly spanned the nation took place in 2000. That’s been the norm ever since, though the exact lineup varies from cycle to cycle as states move their nominating contests around. (Super Tuesday 2008 is still the record-holder for the number of states and the proportion of the total delegates at stake.)

3) What are this year’s Super Tuesday states?
From most delegates at stake to least, they are:
  • California (415 delegates)
  • Texas (228 delegates)
  • North Carolina (110 delegates)
  • Virginia (99 delegates)
  • Massachusetts (91 delegates)
  • Minnesota (75 delegates)
  • Colorado (67 delegates)
  • Tennessee (64 delegates)
  • Alabama (52 delegates)
  • Oklahoma (37 delegates)
  • Arkansas (31 delegates)
  • Utah (29 delegates)
  • Maine (24 delegates)
  • Vermont (16 delegates)
  • American Samoa (6 delegates)
Another contest, involving “Democrats Abroad” — Democratic voters living overseas — will begin on Super Tuesday, but won’t end until March 10. So it’s those 14 states and one territory that will have their voting conclude on Super Tuesday, with 1,344 delegates at stake overall.

That’s a lot to get your head around, so it can be helpful to break down the lineup into groups:

  • California (31 percent of Super Tuesday delegates): The biggest single prize.
  • Seven Southern states (46 percent of the day’s delegates): Like Super Tuesdays of old, this year’s map is skewed toward the South, though it’s a grab bag of very different states from that region — most notably Texas, but also North Carolina, Virginia, Tennessee, Arkansas, Alabama, and Oklahoma.
  • The rest (23 percent of delegates): There’s a trio of New England states, Minnesota from the Midwest, Colorado and Utah from the West, and American Samoa.
Finally, it’s worth remembering that even though Super Tuesday is just one day, several of the states involved began early voting or mail balloting weeks ago. So a chunk of the vote will have been locked in before Tuesday itself.

4) How does someone win Super Tuesday?
In one sense, the way to ensure Super Tuesday delegate dominance is simple — win by a lot, in a lot of places. If Sanders or anyone else manages to do that, they’ll end up with a big delegate lead.

But if most outcomes are closer or if the results are mixed, the delegate situation will be highly contingent on the exact breakdown of the vote, because of Democrats’ complex delegate allocation rules.
Democrats have no “winner-take-all states” (where whoever comes in first place gets all that state’s delegates) — instead, they allot delegates proportionally based on each contest’s results.

That means winning isn’t all that matters: The margin of victory is crucial. A narrow win will barely provide an advantage in the delegate count, because proportional rules mean the second-place finisher usually gets close to the same amount of delegates. But winning in a landslide will provide a big delegate edge.

Beyond that, the devil is in the details, particularly when the field is as large as this one is.

5) Why is the devil in the details?
First off, there’s the threshold: Candidates need to get 15 percent of the vote somewhere to get any delegates there. Those below 15 percent are nonviable and get nothing.

Second, it’s not quite so simple as “30 percent of the vote gets you 30 percent of delegates.” Instead, it’s your percentage of the viable candidates’ vote that matters. Basically, votes for any candidate who’s below 15 percent are excluded, and your percentage of whatever’s left determines your share of delegates.

So let’s say you get 30 percent of the vote, but there are three other viable candidates, getting 25 percent, 20 percent, and 15 percent of the vote. The viable vote adds up to 90 percent, and your 30 percent is one-third of that — so you get one-third of the delegates. Here’s how it would play out under a sample scenario, if there were 10 delegates at stake. (Note: Former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg and Sen. Amy Klobuchar dropped out of the race just before Super Tuesday.)
steps_1_3_vox_tag.jpg


A very different situation transpires if you get 30 percent of the vote and only one other candidate is viable, getting 20 percent, with the rest of the vote split among several others. The viable vote would then add up to 50 percent. Your 30 percent is three-fifths of that — so you get many more of the delegates at stake.
steps_1_3_copy_80.jpg

This means a great deal can depend on the exact breakdown of the vote — particularly in big states with many delegates at stake.

Finally, as if all this wasn’t enough, a candidate’s statewide performance is not all that matters for delegates. The majority of the Super Tuesday delegates (about 65 percent) are in fact allotted based on results in individual districts (mostly congressional districts, except for Texas, which uses state senate districts instead).

Proportional allocation with a 15 percent threshold applies separately in all these districts. That means that if you do well in a state overall but are at 14 percent in a district there, you’ll get zero of that district’s delegates.

Take California. There are 415 total delegates at stake there. But only 144 of them will be awarded proportionally based on statewide results. The other 271 are divvied out according to the proportional results in California’s 53 congressional districts (with 4-7 delegates at stake in each district).

It’s all quite complicated. But all in all, Super Tuesday is a contest to top 15 percent by as much as possible in as many places (states and districts) as possible. Every time candidates get zeroed out by falling below the threshold is bad news for them.

6) So if you get the most delegates, you win, right?
Well, technically, you don’t win the Democratic nomination just by winning more delegates than anyone else. The party’s rules state that you need an outright majority of the 3,979 pledged delegates to win the nomination on the first ballot.

So another key thing to watch for in the Super Tuesday results is whether the delegate leader is on track for an actual majority — or, if not, just how far off track they are from it.

Again, Democrats’ lack of winner-take-all states makes this question very important.

  • If a candidate finishes Super Tuesday with 40 percent of delegates so far, he or she needs to win 56 percent of the remaining delegates for a majority.
  • If the top candidate has 35 percent of delegates after Super Tuesday, he or she needs to win 59 percent of the remaining delegates.
  • If the post-Super Tuesday leader has 30 percent of delegates so far, he or she needs to win 62 percent of the remainder.
The problem is that those proportional delegate allocation rules make it difficult to rack up large delegate advantages. Again, narrow wins in states result in the delegates being split. To gain the upper hand, you can’t just win states — you have to win big.

So if the leading candidate is significantly off track from a majority after the Super Tuesday delegate haul is locked in, he or she may never get back on track for one — paving the way to a contested convention in which no candidate wins the majority on the first ballot (something that’s never occurred in the modern nomination system).

That’s the theory, anyway. Many believe that in practice, Democrats would face enormous pressure to give the nomination to whoever wins the most delegates, even if that person is short of a majority. The specifics could depend on just how big that first-place person’s lead is, and how close to a majority they end up — which shows why, again, the delegate details of Super Tuesday are crucial.

7) What will happen on Super Tuesday this time around?
Overall, despite all the drama in the Democratic contest so far, it’s important to remember that barely any delegates (just 4 percent of the total) will have been allotted before Super Tuesday.

So while the expectation now is that Bernie Sanders is the frontrunner, and polls appear to back that up, this won’t really be set in stone until we see how he — and everyone else — does on Super Tuesday.

Sanders could, as many now expect, win most states by significant margins and build a sizable delegate lead that will carry him to the nomination. But if there’s a late swing to another candidate — such as Biden, who just won big in South Carolina on Saturday — Sanders could also lose his frontrunner status quite quickly.

For the other candidates who have had more mixed outcomes or little success, Super Tuesday is really do or die. If you don’t get a significant chunk of the Super Tuesday delegates, it becomes all but impossible to get a pledged delegate majority.

Super Tuesday is also the first electoral test for former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg, who has spent half a billion dollars on advertising across the country but skipped the four early states. Bloomberg rose in national polls and in polls of Super Tuesday states over the past month, but scrutiny of his past and his rocky performance in the Democratic Las Vegas debate have lately sent his numbers in the other direction.

But the crowded field this year means that, depending on how the ball bounces on March 3, there are several possible outcomes with very different implications for the race. Here are the main ones:

  • One candidate emerges with a large delegate lead and on track for the majority: This would mean they’re a commanding favorite to win the nomination.
  • One candidate emerges with a large delegate plurality in a split field but is not on track for a majority: This means that person is the favorite to get the nomination eventually, but one or more of their rivals could continue campaigning to try and deprive them of the majority and make things interesting at the convention.
  • Two candidates split almost all the delegates: This would likely mean a two-person race going forward, with the outcome up in the air, but likely to be settled before the convention (since it’s extremely likely, in a two-candidate race, that one person ends up with a majority).
  • Three or more candidates split delegates, and no one’s on track for a majority: This is the scenario where a contested convention would be most likely.
Finally, it’s entirely possible that we won’t actually know the Super Tuesday outcome on Super Tuesday. For instance, California takes a famously long time to count votes (due to the need to verify late-arriving mailed ballots), and the exact vote shares and margins both statewide and in its 53 congressional districts could be important.

If one candidate does end up winning almost everywhere, that might not be such a big deal. But in this nomination contest so far, it’s usually prudent to expect that things could get messy

------------------------
Super Tuesday looks to be interesting with Klob and Mayor Pete dropping out, I imagine Biden and Bloomberg will pickup most of those delegates. Looks to be lots of fun.


Polls: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/democratic_nomination_polls/

CNN interviews with all the candidates from last night:
Michael Bloomberg

Elizabeth Warren:

Bernie Sanders:

Joe Biden:

My super tuesday choices:
Alabama(Biden), Arkansas(Biden), California(Bernie), Colorado(Bernie), Democrats Abroad(Biden), Maine(Biden), Massachusetts(Biden), Minnesota(Biden), North Carolina(Biden), Oklahoma(Biden), Tennessee(Biden), Texas(Bernie), Utah(Bernie), Vermont(Bernie), and Virginia(Biden)

Update: All but Texas I got correct, based. I forgot American Samoa but that's tribes of people and my guess is as good as any. Democrats abroad takes a week to trickle in.
 
Last edited:
Like clockwork lol


Why does the DNC have such an insane hard on about Tulsi? This seems insane the way they keep shifting rules to keep her off the stage. She would be a near perfect Veep pick for someone like Biden. Young, ethnically diverse woman of color. And would shore up the centrists and give a ticket some Military and National Security Credibility. But they stiff arm her harder than anybody else. Did she refuse to give Tom Perez his mandatory blow job?
 
Why does the DNC have such an insane hard on about Tulsi? This seems insane the way they keep shifting rules to keep her off the stage. She would be a near perfect Veep pick for someone like Biden. Young, ethnically diverse woman of color. And would shore up the centrists and give a ticket some Military and National Security Credibility. But they stiff arm her harder than anybody else. Did she refuse to give Tom Perez his mandatory blow job?

Queen Hillary is mad about the younger, fertile female. No joke. That is all it is. Gabbard had the audacity to be more attractive, more well liked within the DNC itself, and most damning at all, refused to curtsy to the queen. So she is getting the snow white treatment.
 
View attachment 1173290

View attachment 1173293

View attachment 1173294

View attachment 1173295


Like I said in a previous post, you could shout "nigger" to the top of your lungs 1000x a day and never be as racist as they present themselves. Really makes you think.
I know that "Ohh you're the real racists for caring about race so much" is such a tired and drawn out meme against these fuckers, but they just pull off those accusations off so eloquently when the PeeOhSees they claim to love oh so very much no longer have any use as their shield.
 

The absolute state of the far left. Remember folks, these are the kind of people who either generate this kind of fear-mongering against Republicans with regards to minorities come election time or fall for said propaganda. What a bunch of scumbags. There is nothing close to this for conservatives/Republicans.
 
Last edited:
I know that "Ohh you're the real racists for caring about race so much" is such a tired and drawn out meme against these fuckers, but they just pull off those accusations off so eloquently when the PeeOhSees they claim to love oh so very much no longer have any use as their shield.
Shit, it's barely even been a full day and it's not even a guarantee that Bernie will lose, and they've already started making black people sit in the back of the bus before throwing them underneath it. That didn't fuckin' take long at all, did it? At least finish crossing the bridge before you burn it down, Goddamn.
 
I know that "Ohh you're the real racists for caring about race so much" is such a tired and drawn out meme against these fuckers, but they just pull off those accusations off so eloquently when the PeeOhSees they claim to love oh so very much no longer have any use as their shield.
Notice how it rolls off their tongues so easily. Indeed it's a tired argument, but it's moments such as these where they finally show their true colors.

1583350836946.png


A little blast from the past, remember '16:


My sides have left the orbit
 
Shit, it's barely even been a full day and it's not even a guarantee that Bernie will lose, and they've already started making black people sit in the back of the bus before throwing them underneath it. That didn't fuckin' take long at all, did it? At least finish crossing the bridge before you burn it down, Goddamn.
Then when they inevitably bring up shit like the Calexits again or States Rights when Trump wins in November, I'm just waiting for the crazy fuckers to whip out the Battle Flags and the Grey Uniforms any goddamn day now
 
Shit, it's barely even been a full day and it's not even a guarantee that Bernie will lose, and they've already started making black people sit in the back of the bus before throwing them underneath it. That didn't fuckin' take long at all, did it? At least finish crossing the bridge before you burn it down, Goddamn.
They are unironicly two seconds from adding the National to Socialism; /pol/ is having a lot of fun kicking them over the edge by either pretending to be one of them or by pretending to be a Black Biden voter.
 
Why does the DNC have such an insane hard on about Tulsi? This seems insane the way they keep shifting rules to keep her off the stage. She would be a near perfect Veep pick for someone like Biden. Young, ethnically diverse woman of color. And would shore up the centrists and give a ticket some Military and National Security Credibility. But they stiff arm her harder than anybody else. Did she refuse to give Tom Perez his mandatory blow job?
The most bizarre thing is Tulsi isn't even a threat she's barely ekking her way into the debates as is.
 
Queen Hillary is mad about the younger, fertile female. No joke. That is all it is. Gabbard had the audacity to be more attractive, more well liked within the DNC itself, and most damning at all, refused to curtsy to the queen. So she is getting the snow white treatment.
The memes coming from this are funnier but the reality is she's getting the same kind of treatment every other isolationist foreign policy wonk who tries to run gets. They treated Ron Paul and Ralph Nader in very similar fashion.
 
The absolute state of the far left. Remember folks, these are the kind of people who either generate fear-mongering against Republicans come election time or fall for said propaganda. What a bunch of scumbags. There is nothing close to this for conservatives/Republicans.
Is it really a shock though? People are trained to hate flyover country (read; white people with fewer economic prospects) for being stupid and traditional. Certain left wing apparatchiks have used hatred as an essential tool to mobilise their voters for decades. Why are we surprised when this sectarian dogwhistle politics backfires when people vent their anger against Southern Blacks? These people clearly aren't above stereotyping and vilifying others that they're taught deserve such ridicule.

Although the GOP is the 'white party' and everybody knows it, the politicians themselves are ashamed to admit this, and dedicate immense time and resources to doing outreach and shows of goodwill towards minority groups.
Any republican that would employ rhetoric advocating 'white interests' is immediately shunned and blacklisted. By contrast, you get ahead in the Democratic party by advocating for the interests of some sort of marginalised group, be it sexual, racial, or economic class. To them, they are herding cohorts of people towards a desired end goal, so naturally will get infuriated when some of these well-defined groups vote-bloc against Bernie.

It's a cringey boomer talking point that Democrats are the real racists, but something has to be said for the disparate nature of thinking in the country.
The right have trained themselves to be ignorant of colour to the point of being blind to stats on wealth, education and crime.
Meanwhile the left train people to see nothing but colour. Rile people up to loving some groups and vilifying others.
 
The Rageaholic has up an interesting piece on the Biden Bernie Battle. The long section overlaying Ayn Rand's rather amusing 100 year old lecture over the actions of the modern revolutionaries is both hilarious and sad. We truly do live in Clown World. And it never ever changes. I'm starting to think the crazy Korean Death Cult might have been right. Come take me away Corona-Chan!
 
Can't believe the Boomer Coomer actually did it, absolute mad man
View attachment 1173290

View attachment 1173293

View attachment 1173294

View attachment 1173295


Like I said in a previous post, you could shout "nigger" to the top of your lungs 1000x a day and never be as racist as they present themselves. Really makes you think.
I don't get why they say the LGBT is an obstacle, unless they are actually acknowledging that alot of the people in the alphabet rainbow hate each others guts or something
 
Is it really a shock though? People are trained to hate flyover country (read; white people with fewer economic prospects) for being stupid and traditional. Certain left wing apparatchiks have used hatred as an essential tool to mobilise their voters for decades. Why are we surprised when this sectarian dogwhistle politics backfires when people vent their anger against Southern Blacks? These people clearly aren't above stereotyping and vilifying others that they're taught deserve such ridicule.

Although the GOP is the 'white party' and everybody knows it, the politicians themselves are ashamed to admit this, and dedicate immense time and resources to doing outreach and shows of goodwill towards minority groups.
Any republican that would employ rhetoric advocating 'white interests' is immediately shunned and blacklisted. By contrast, you get ahead in the Democratic party by advocating for the interests of some sort of marginalised group, be it sexual, racial, or economic class. To them, they are herding cohorts of people towards a desired end goal, so naturally will get infuriated when some of these well-defined groups vote-bloc against Bernie.

It's a cringey boomer talking point that Democrats are the real racists, but something has to be said for the disparate nature of thinking in the country.
The right have trained themselves to be ignorant of colour to the point of being blind to stats on wealth, education and crime.
Meanwhile the left train people to see nothing but colour. Rile people up to loving some groups and vilifying others.

The only two things that are surprising about this sort of crap is 1) weak-kneed Republicans (in particular McCain and Romney) falling victim to this sort of crap while not pointing out how BS it is and 2) that the Left actually thinks they can keep using this play and win.
 
Was Reagan at any point of his presidency as demented as Biden is in 2020? As someone who went through a relative with Alzheimer's it's jarring, absolutely jarring seeing Biden like this.

There is no way he can be elected on health grounds alone.


Do you count that time Reagan saw a Sci-Fi movie then told the Russians he was going to build space lasers to shoot all their missiles down?
 
Can't believe the Boomer Coomer actually did it, absolute mad man

I don't get why they say the LGBT is an obstacle, unless they are actually acknowledging that alot of the people in the alphabet rainbow hate each others guts or something
Gender reassignment is bourgeoisie. Soviets and China don't tolerate this gay bullshit.

Do you count that time Reagan saw a Sci-Fi movie then told the Russians he was going to build space lasers to shoot all their missiles down?
The SDI program eventually bore fruit, though. 80's were just way too early.
 
Back