Aside from Bumpfag (who "recently" had his favorite pseudonym figured out (
deviantart), (
reddit), (
tumblr), (
twitter)), there is another obsessed freak on /tg/ with similar interests and ritualposting behavior who is
much more obviously malicious. Did I say tg? I mean that this anon (or should I say "
Frustraturnity" or "TheHilariousWalrus", definitely with more alts) is also doing this same routine on /tv/, /his/, and /x/.
"I've said this a few times, but this troll is essentially a /pol/tard new atheist, which is one of the funniest combinations imaginable"
The other magic faggot goes into any thread dealing with the concept of magic and restarts the same routine monologue in the thread's lifetime, which is something like "magic and science are the same thing, even in a fictional context, just seen through different lenses, but defining magic in any way misses the point, so hard magic systems are an oxymoron and dark fantasy is the master race". Essentially the opposite to Bumpfag including the feigned interest in genre fiction (both of these fags, Literary Lord and Frustraturnity, are ritualposters, and ritualposters only use their topics of choice as justifications for their addiction to the board software).
He breaks this up into a scripted argument with innocent anons, samefagging along the way, instead of writing an article or meme that he can post everywhere to explain his complete philosophy with greater success. That mean that he doesn't endlessly repost the same images in the proud tradition of all obsessed faggots:
Moreover, because of his commitment to an eternity of the same argument, he has catchphrases that are hardwired into his muscle memory as much as the reddit spacing, which you can copy into the search form of an archive to other threads where he's throwing breadcrumbs of his philosophy at anon. Because he refuses to bring them together like an intellectual or noteworthy schizophrenic, we can compile them on our own terms with the refutation included. It is a responsibility to spare anons from another second with him by showing that 1) he has a long history of this shit, 2) there will never be a productive conversation with him, 3) he is WRONG.
I am predicting that some of you are about to object that he shares your opinions, proving that he is 'based and redpilled', and that he admits to using
reverse psychology to necromance the argument so I must just be contrarian.
You would be wrong. He says that there is no definition of 'magic' except for a narrow anthropological definition, which is only useful for the 'out of universe' view of a belief in magic, never for the belief in magic itself. Every belief in magic has to have it defined as
something, in any age, by any practice, in order to believe in it. Of course his
forced catchphrase would beg to differ.
(Translation: It is a disservice to magic to entertain its existence in any way.)
"So he wants us to use a certain word for our spell-casters other than magic, to show that they're scientific creations?" No, that's how you get a hard magic system and
he hates those. This is why he doesn't explain his worldview in one piece, because it is deliberately chimerical to distance itself from anyone with a real worldview (or from any story that doesn't embrace Martin or Brucatto style postmodernist occult atheism), so that he can always condescend to anyone who has figured out the logical conclusion of whatever he's saying. Postmodernists and schizophrenics, but I repeat myself, don't talk to communicate but to attack others as an assertion of their superiority. Everything that I have reposted, or are about to repost, was posted with that hostile intent and it matters to let other people know about it.
