- Joined
- Nov 4, 2017
Paizo has released a draft of the ORC License for public comment. Surprisingly, the creative director wasn't prevaricating: there isn't the faintest whiff of a morality clause.
Some interesting points:
- The license has no controlling organization explicitly so that it cannot be politicized.
- The license cannot be revised, amended, or revoked.
- The license is designed to discourage litigation.
IANAL quick skim analysis:
tl;dr: Company agnositic OGL with some QOL improvements. Longer, but not overly so. More legalese but still rather reasonable. More precise.
Takeaways:
- License is registered as a copyrighted product, so it'll be on file with the copyright office. It cannot be revised or amended. They state they are public domaining it, but it means this is on file with the gubmint and easy produce an original copy in case of litagation. This is a pretty novel solution.
- Attribution chain is mandatory but very simple. Includes you listing your work's attribution so downstreamers can just C&P.
- You can also call out specific things that would be covered content for inclusion 'downstream' without licensing the entire work; You can also call out specific parts of your work as explicitly NOT transfered by ORC. That's why no CC-BY - no option for downstream to reserve rights.
- Includes inventory destruction is not required for violators who breech but then correct. Whew lads. this is likely to make it unpalatable to any big boys, but consider that a sniff test.
- There is some EU mandated GPDR faggotry I couldn't parse.
It is longer and slightly less 'normie readable' than OGL but doesn't waste words and isn't overly lawyer-speak.
Makes it easier for you to create derivatives with permissive IP without giving away all your rights.
Last edited: